03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NUMBER 89 297<br />

saurs (Figure 1E-G). This is not surprising when we consider<br />

that it is merely an elaboration of bone that was already involved<br />

with fixing the teeth to the jaw. In camosaurs, this expansion<br />

forms structures that have been variously termed "interdental<br />

rugosae" (Osborn, 1912), "interdental plates''<br />

(Madsen, 1976), or "infradental plates" (Gardiner, 1982). In<br />

the mandible, these "plates" lie on top of the dentary and are<br />

slightly labially inset to the lingual wall. In the upper jaw, they<br />

lie beneath the maxilla and premaxilla, slightly labial to the lingual<br />

walls (Figure lF,G). They are generally bounded anteriorly<br />

and posteriorly by vertical grooves leading into foramina at the<br />

base of the plates. The foramina also are connected by a horizontal<br />

groove on the ledge at the base of the interdental plates.<br />

Each foramen is paired to one tooth site and commonly contains<br />

a developing tooth (Figure lG). The grooves and foramina<br />

may mark the sites for the dental lamellae, an interpretation<br />

that is consistent with their termination at the location of newly<br />

deposited tooth crowns. Because the grooves are at the tooth<br />

sites of the jaw, the flat attachment bone between them is "interdental."<br />

Interdental plates of this sort occur in most saurischians<br />

and in many thecodonts (Martin et al., 1980). The only<br />

significant variation we have seen in the morphology of interdental<br />

plates is the occasional obliteration of the vertical<br />

grooves in presumably older individuals. That the interdental<br />

plates are continuous with the interdental septae and distinct<br />

from the tooth-bearing bones themselves was observed by Osborn<br />

(1912) and Walker (1964).<br />

Each method of lingual wall formation is accompanied by a<br />

characteristic mode of tooth replacement. In fact, in the crocodilian<br />

mode of replacement, the new tooth has most of its formation<br />

in the pulp cavity of its predecessor. This mode of replacement<br />

also is facilitated by the expanded root and was<br />

described by Edmund (1960:114-115) thus: "The crown of a<br />

replacement tooth develops within the body of the old tooth,<br />

mainly below the neck separating the wider base from the narrower<br />

crown. In this way the diameter of the replacement<br />

crown can become greater than that of the crown of the tooth<br />

within which it lies." The signature feature of this type of replacement<br />

is a pit that completely surrounds the developing replacement<br />

tooth (Figure 2E,F), a feature that is absent in all of<br />

the many thousands of known dinosaur teeth. Edmund<br />

(1969:186) pointed out that saurischian dinosaurs differ from<br />

crocodilians in that the replacement tooth did not enter its predecessor's<br />

pulp cavity at an early stage, but seems to have been<br />

associated with progressive lingual resorption, with the resulting<br />

appearance of having dissolved its way into the lingual<br />

wall. The new tooth does not become central in the alveolus<br />

until it is about half grown, and much of its predecessor has<br />

been resorbed. Frequently a replacement tooth can be seen in<br />

the alveolus lingual to its predecessor, the latter being still perfectly<br />

functional. From the discussions of Edmund (1960,<br />

1969), and from examination of many saurischian specimens, it<br />

is clear that the replacement teeth of saurischians form and<br />

continue in an upright position to their maturity. In camosaurs<br />

FIGURE 2.—A-D, Teeth of theropod dinosaurs thought by various authors to be<br />

especially close to birds: A, Mononykus (modified from Perle et al., 1993); B,<br />

Troodon; C, Saurornitholestes; D, Dromaeosaurus (C-D modified from Currie<br />

et al., 1990). Teeth showing constricted crown, replacement tooth tip, and<br />

expanded base: E, bird, Parahesperornis alexi Martin; F,G, crocodilian, Alligator;<br />

G, lateral cross section showing the tilted replacement tooth resorbing the<br />

root of its predecessor (modified from Edmund, 1962).<br />

the replacement teeth form rows on the lingual side of the mature<br />

tooth, and we have seen as many as three generations of<br />

teeth ranked side by side. In crocodilians, however, the replacement<br />

tooth prepares to enter the pulp chamber of its predecessor<br />

by first tilting toward it (Figure 2G). The developing crown<br />

then passes in and upward through a circular resorption window<br />

in its predecessor (Figure 2F). The teeth of crocodilians<br />

are attached by periodontal ligaments running from the jaw<br />

bones to the root cementum on the expanded roots (Miller,<br />

1968). This mode of attachment has not been recognized in<br />

other diapsid reptiles, which also may lack the necessary root<br />

cementum.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!