03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

272 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY<br />

FIGURE 8.—Comparison of palate structures in ventral view: A, Kiwi, Apteryx sp.; B, Rhea, Rhea americana; C,<br />

Ostrich, Struthio camelus. Probable paths for transferring longitudinal compression forces stippled.<br />

Bpt=basipterygoid process; Mx=maxillary; Pal=palatine; Pmx=premaxillary; Pt=pterygoid; Q=quadrate;<br />

Vbm=vomer. Scale=20 mm.<br />

of their interconnecting point by means of the formation and<br />

gradual elongation of the medial mandibular process. After the<br />

alignment, this hypothetical digastric muscular complex must<br />

have separated from the mandible. Apparently, the recent occipito-mandibular<br />

ligament represents the reduced caudal belly<br />

of the digastric complex.<br />

Conclusion<br />

I would like to comment on the reinterpretation by McDowell<br />

(1978) of the homologies in the avian upper jaw and palate.<br />

It is, of course, tempting to use the kinetic mobility in the skull<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Bock, W.J.<br />

1963. The Cranial Evidence for Ratite Affinities. In Charles G. Sibley, editor,<br />

Proceedings of the XIII International Ornithological Congress,<br />

Ithaca 17-24 1962, 1:39-54.<br />

Buhler, P.<br />

1985. On the Morphology of the Skull of Archaeopteryx. In M.K. Hecht,<br />

editor, The Beginnings of Birds: Proceedings of the International<br />

as a cause of fragmentation of a huge, ancient pterygoid bone<br />

into two; however, many traits in the general arrangement of<br />

the bones (primarily palatine position relative to the choana,<br />

premaxillary, etc.) seem to be consistent with the traditional interpretation<br />

that these two bones represent the reptilian palatine<br />

and pterygoid. The skull in ancient birds almost certainly had<br />

less internal mobility than it does in recent paleognaths, and<br />

such characters as the shape of the lateral rim of the palate or<br />

the pattern of epidermal papillae can hardly be valid. Finally, it<br />

is too difficult to accept McDowell's proposed loss of the maxillary<br />

bone in birds and his consequent thesis that the maxillopalatine<br />

of birds is equivalent to the reptilian palatine.<br />

Archaeopteryx Conference, Eichstdtt, 1984, pages 135-140. Eichstatt:<br />

Freunde des Jura-Museums, Eichstatt.<br />

Cracraft, J.<br />

1974. Phylogeny and Evolution of the Ratite Birds. Ibis, 116:494-521.<br />

de Beer, G.R.<br />

1956. The Evolution of Ratites. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural<br />

History), Zoology, 4(2):59-70.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!