03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Implications of the Cranial Morphology of Paleognaths<br />

for Avian Evolution<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In the early evolution of birds, bill formation produced a problem<br />

for muscular control of the thin, elongated upper jaw. In particular,<br />

it required a relatively high retracting force. Three sources<br />

of this force evolved. (1) A powerful M. retractor palatini (especially<br />

in Tinamiformes and Apteryx), originating primarily on the<br />

vomer and pterygoid, developed to provide direct muscular connection<br />

between the dermal palate and the cranial base. It apparently<br />

evolved due to a joining of the medial portions of the<br />

pterygoid and mandibular depressor muscles, which were aligned<br />

by development of the proc. mandibulae medialis (a character<br />

unique to birds). (2) The ancestral pseudotemporalis muscle developed<br />

into two portions, a large postorbital portion and an almost<br />

horizontally oriented intramandibular portion. Each portion seves<br />

to increase the retraction ability of the muscle as a whole. (3) The<br />

external mandibular adductor muscle developed, which, in neognaths,<br />

is larger than either muscle previously mentioned. Its evolutionary<br />

development was temporarily retarded by reduction of<br />

one of its places of origin—the upper temporal arch.<br />

Introduction<br />

For more than a century, paleognaths have been subjected to<br />

morphological studies in order to ascertain their apparently<br />

primitive nature and to discover their position in avian phylogeny<br />

(W.K. Parker, 1866; T.J. Parker, 1891; Pycraft, 1900; Mc­<br />

Dowell, 1948; Hofer, 1945, 1950, 1955; de Beer, 1956; Webb,<br />

1957; Muller, 1963; Bock, 1963; Cracraft, 1974; Yudin, 1970,<br />

1978). I shall try to extract information on avian ancestry from<br />

the comparative and functional morphology of the feeding apparatus<br />

in paleognaths.<br />

Nomenclature for species' binomials and English names of<br />

modem birds follows Sibley and Monroe (1990).<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.—In the process of this work I received<br />

valuable assistance from the following individuals and<br />

Felix Y. Dzerzhinsky, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University,<br />

Moscow 119899, Russia.<br />

Felix Y. Dzerzhinsky<br />

267<br />

institutions. F. Vuilleumier and A.V. Andors (American Museum<br />

of Natural History, New York, New York) and E.G. Kordicova<br />

(Institute of Zoology, Kazakh Academy of Sciences, Almaty,<br />

Kazakhstan) granted me access to the alcoholic specimen<br />

of Apteryx sp.; K.A. Yudin and V.M. <strong>Lo</strong>skot (Zoological Institute,<br />

Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia)<br />

provided me with specimens of Eudromia and Casuarius and<br />

with several skulls of paleognaths, respectively. M.V. Bevolskaya<br />

(Institute of Cattle-Breeding Askania-Nova, Ukraine)<br />

permitted me to dissect the alcoholic heads of Dromaius novaehollandiae<br />

(Latham), Rhea americana (Linnaeus), and<br />

Struthio camelus (Linnaeus). A. Elzanowski (National Museum<br />

of Natural History, <strong>Smithsonian</strong> <strong>Institution</strong>, Washington,<br />

D.C.) and E.N. Kurochkin kindly assisted me in obtaining literature.<br />

A.N. Kuznetsov helped me in editing the manuscript and<br />

in translating it into English. S.C. Bennett, L.D. Martin, and<br />

S.L. Olson read the English version with fruitful criticism and<br />

helped me in editing it. I am sincerely grateful to all these persons.<br />

This work was supported by The Cultural Initiative Foundation,<br />

Moscow, and by The Russian Foundation of Basic <strong>Res</strong>earches<br />

(RFBR, grant N 96-04-50822).<br />

Skeleto-muscular Consequences of Bill Formation<br />

The adductory force of the mandible is transferred to the upper<br />

jaw through a food object. <strong>Res</strong>istance of the upper jaw to<br />

this force is produced (Figure 1) by a combination of tension<br />

on the ventral stalk (premaxillary and maxillary bones with<br />

palate caudally) and longitudinal compression of the dorsal<br />

stalk (frontal projection of premaxillary and premaxillary processes<br />

of the nasal bones). The longer the jaw grew, the greater<br />

the forces became, and, due to jaw lightening, the stresses became<br />

ever greater.<br />

The active forces necessary for normal grasping of food<br />

items must be supplied by muscles. The muscular force that<br />

creates tension in the palate and upper-bill floor also can accomplish<br />

ventral movement of the upper jaw by means of re-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!