PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
A New Species of Graculavus from the Cretaceous of Wyoming (Aves: Neornithes) ABSTRACT A new species of Graculavus from the Lance Formation, Wyoming, extends the range of the genus from the Atlantic paleocoastline to the near-shore of the Cretaceous inland sea. The type and referred species were nearly contemporaneous in the late Maastrichtian. The new species was a very large flying bird with the proximal end of the humems in the size range of the largest modem gulls or geese. The systematic and biogeographic significance of Graculavus-like birds is discussed. Introduction Graculavus velox Marsh, 1872, was described as a cormorant, but since then it has been diagnosed as a shorebird (Shufeldt, 1915) and characterized as "transitional," referring to intermediacy between charadriiforms and gruiforms (Olson, 1985:171). The genus has been monotypic since Olson and Parris (1987) synonymized G. pumilus Marsh, 1872, with Telmatomis priscus Marsh, 1870. The changing taxonomic treatments reflect the difficulty of identifying isolated fragments of unknown birds. The discovery of a very large new species of Graculavus provides an opportunity to review the significance of this genus of early neomithine birds. The two known species of Graculavus are approximately contemporaneous representatives of widely separated, near-shore environments in the Late Cretaceous. Both species are known only from the proximal end of the humems, which, interestingly, is very similar to that of the early anseriform Presbyornis. Because the phylogenetic position of the Anseriformes remains a key problem in avian taxonomy (Ericson, 1996), the resemblance of Graculavus to both Presbyornis and the Charadriiformes takes on systematic interest. This paper describes the new species and provides a brief Sylvia Hope Sylvia Hope, Department of Ornithology and Mammalogy, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118, United States. 261 perspective on the characters and biogeography of Graculavuslike birds. METHODS CHARACTER ANALYSIS.—Polarity of osteologie characters was judged from comparison of a broad selection of neomithine birds with other Ornithurae and with Enantiornithes (Hope, unpublished data). Because uncertainties surround the basal phylogeny of Neornithes, the definition and phylogenetic diagnosis of higher groupings within it is uncertain. Principal comparisons herein are to "waterbirds" as defined below. Characters cited for waterbirds occur in most of them, and some characters occur elsewhere among Neornithes as isolated instances but not as a concerted complex. At the genus and species levels, diagnosis of fragments by synapomorphy is rarely possible, so identification at these levels is based on a unique combination of attributes. NAMES.—Higher taxon names are used in the sense of Wetmore (1960), except that these names are used herein in the node-based sense (de Queiroz and Gauthier, 1992) to include fossil forms sharing a most recent common ancestor with the extant crown taxon. The name "Ciconiiformes" is avoided because of gross disparity in usage, both historical and recent. English vernacular names are used for groups of birds with equivocal systematic status. Such names do not necessarily imply monophyly and are as follows: "waterbirds," refers to all "seabirds," "shorebirds," and the Anseriformes; "seabirds" refers to the Procellariiformes, Pelecaniformes, penguins, loons, and grebes; "shorebirds" refers to the Charadriiformes, ibises and flamingos, storks, and herons. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.—For the opportunity to collect in the field and to describe this and other specimens, I thank Malcolm C. McKenna, American Museum of Natural History, New York (AMNH). Charlotte Holton (AMNH) arranged the loan of fossil material. Storrs L. Olson, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C, gave access to Hornerstown specimens and other fossil material in his care. David C. Parris and William B. Gallagher, New Jersey
- Page 219 and 220: NUMBER 89 209 son with other known
- Page 221 and 222: NUMBER 89 211 FIGURE 1.—Argornis
- Page 223 and 224: NUMBER 89 213 AM AL AM AL AM AL AM
- Page 225 and 226: NUMBER 89 215 caput humeri perpendi
- Page 227 and 228: Selmes absurdipes, New Genus, New S
- Page 229 and 230: NUMBER 89 219 FIGURE 2.—Selmes ab
- Page 231 and 232: NUMBER 89 221 Costae: Deformed frag
- Page 233 and 234: A Fossil Screamer (Anseriformes: An
- Page 235 and 236: NUMBER 89 FIGURE 3.—Chaunoides an
- Page 237 and 238: NUMBER 89 227 B C D FIGURE 6.—The
- Page 239 and 240: NUMBER 89 229 FIGURE 9.—Right tib
- Page 241 and 242: The Anseriform Relationships of Ana
- Page 243 and 244: NUMBER 89 233 Subfamily ANATALAVINA
- Page 245 and 246: NUMBER 89 235 mal was found under t
- Page 247 and 248: NUMBER 89 237 tion, with retroartic
- Page 249 and 250: NUMBER 89 FIGURE 7.—Sternum and p
- Page 251 and 252: NUMBER 89 241 der. The bone is very
- Page 253: NUMBER 89 243 Eocene records of the
- Page 256 and 257: 246 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 258 and 259: 248 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 260 and 261: 250 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 263 and 264: Presbyornis isoni and Other Late Pa
- Page 265 and 266: NUMBER 89 255 FIGURE 1.—Referred
- Page 267 and 268: NUMBER 89 257 vical vertebrae of th
- Page 269: NUMBER 89 259 (Olson and Parris, 19
- Page 273 and 274: NUMBER 89 263 10mm FIGURE 1.—Prox
- Page 275 and 276: NUMBER 89 265 morphic among them. W
- Page 277 and 278: Implications of the Cranial Morphol
- Page 279 and 280: NUMBER 89 269 C Psp Lep FIGURE 3.
- Page 281 and 282: NUMBER 89 271 FIGURE 6.—Lateral s
- Page 283 and 284: NUMBER 89 273 Pmm FIGURE 9.—Some
- Page 285 and 286: The Relationships of the Early Cret
- Page 287 and 288: NUMBER 89 277 of fossil fishes, the
- Page 289 and 290: NUMBER 89 279 FIGURE 3.—Compositi
- Page 291 and 292: NUMBER 89 281 slabs, respectively.
- Page 293 and 294: NUMBER 89 283 These are the absence
- Page 295 and 296: Enantiornithes: Earlier Birds than
- Page 297 and 298: NUMBER 89 287 and Australia by way
- Page 299 and 300: Feathered Dinosaur or Bird? A New L
- Page 301 and 302: NUMBER 89 291 in the skin of the pa
- Page 303: NUMBER 89 293 teryx is a side branc
- Page 306 and 307: 296 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 308 and 309: 298 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 310 and 311: 300 Brown, B., and E.M. Schlaikjer
- Page 312 and 313: 302 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 314 and 315: 304 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 316 and 317: 306 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 318 and 319: 308 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
A New Species of Graculavus from the<br />
Cretaceous of Wyoming (Aves: Neornithes)<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A new species of Graculavus from the Lance Formation, Wyoming,<br />
extends the range of the genus from the Atlantic paleocoastline<br />
to the near-shore of the Cretaceous inland sea. The type and<br />
referred species were nearly contemporaneous in the late Maastrichtian.<br />
The new species was a very large flying bird with the<br />
proximal end of the humems in the size range of the largest modem<br />
gulls or geese. The systematic and biogeographic significance<br />
of Graculavus-like birds is discussed.<br />
Introduction<br />
Graculavus velox Marsh, 1872, was described as a cormorant,<br />
but since then it has been diagnosed as a shorebird<br />
(Shufeldt, 1915) and characterized as "transitional," referring<br />
to intermediacy between charadriiforms and gruiforms (Olson,<br />
1985:171). The genus has been monotypic since Olson and<br />
Parris (1987) synonymized G. pumilus Marsh, 1872, with Telmatomis<br />
priscus Marsh, 1870. The changing taxonomic treatments<br />
reflect the difficulty of identifying isolated fragments of<br />
unknown birds.<br />
The discovery of a very large new species of Graculavus<br />
provides an opportunity to review the significance of this genus<br />
of early neomithine birds. The two known species of Graculavus<br />
are approximately contemporaneous representatives of<br />
widely separated, near-shore environments in the Late Cretaceous.<br />
Both species are known only from the proximal end of<br />
the humems, which, interestingly, is very similar to that of the<br />
early anseriform Presbyornis. Because the phylogenetic position<br />
of the Anseriformes remains a key problem in avian taxonomy<br />
(Ericson, 1996), the resemblance of Graculavus to both<br />
Presbyornis and the Charadriiformes takes on systematic interest.<br />
This paper describes the new species and provides a brief<br />
Sylvia Hope<br />
Sylvia Hope, Department of Ornithology and Mammalogy, California<br />
Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California<br />
94118, United States.<br />
261<br />
perspective on the characters and biogeography of Graculavuslike<br />
birds.<br />
METHODS<br />
CHARACTER ANALYSIS.—Polarity of osteologie characters<br />
was judged from comparison of a broad selection of neomithine<br />
birds with other Ornithurae and with Enantiornithes<br />
(Hope, unpublished data). Because uncertainties surround the<br />
basal phylogeny of Neornithes, the definition and phylogenetic<br />
diagnosis of higher groupings within it is uncertain. Principal<br />
comparisons herein are to "waterbirds" as defined below. Characters<br />
cited for waterbirds occur in most of them, and some<br />
characters occur elsewhere among Neornithes as isolated instances<br />
but not as a concerted complex. At the genus and species<br />
levels, diagnosis of fragments by synapomorphy is rarely<br />
possible, so identification at these levels is based on a unique<br />
combination of attributes.<br />
NAMES.—Higher taxon names are used in the sense of Wetmore<br />
(1960), except that these names are used herein in the<br />
node-based sense (de Queiroz and Gauthier, 1992) to include<br />
fossil forms sharing a most recent common ancestor with the<br />
extant crown taxon. The name "Ciconiiformes" is avoided because<br />
of gross disparity in usage, both historical and recent.<br />
English vernacular names are used for groups of birds with<br />
equivocal systematic status. Such names do not necessarily imply<br />
monophyly and are as follows: "waterbirds," refers to all<br />
"seabirds," "shorebirds," and the Anseriformes; "seabirds" refers<br />
to the Procellariiformes, Pelecaniformes, penguins, loons,<br />
and grebes; "shorebirds" refers to the Charadriiformes, ibises<br />
and flamingos, storks, and herons.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.—For the opportunity to collect in the<br />
field and to describe this and other specimens, I thank Malcolm<br />
C. McKenna, American Museum of Natural History, New<br />
York (AMNH). Charlotte Holton (AMNH) arranged the loan<br />
of fossil material. Storrs L. Olson, National Museum of Natural<br />
History, <strong>Smithsonian</strong> <strong>Institution</strong>, Washington, D.C, gave access<br />
to Hornerstown specimens and other fossil material in his<br />
care. David C. Parris and William B. Gallagher, New Jersey