03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248<br />

SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY<br />

J Presbyornis<br />

FIGURE 2.—Right coracoid in ventral view, with inset showing the head in medial view. Juncitarsus gracillimus:<br />

USNM 468466. Presbyornis pervetus: UCMP 126194. (a=processus acrocoracoideus, Z>=facies articularis clavicularis.)<br />

the Presbyornithidae); the scar for M. scapulohumeralis cranialis<br />

forming a shallow to moderately deep, elliptical depression<br />

(a narrow, deep scar in the Presbyornithidae); the fossa pneumotricipitalis<br />

ventralis small and perhaps pneumatic (a large,<br />

deep, nonpneumatic excavation in the Presbyornithidae); the<br />

scars for Mm. latissimus dorsi posterioris and anterioris are directed<br />

toward a point well distal of where the deltoid crest sets<br />

off from the shaft (directed toward where the crest sets off from<br />

the shaft in the Presbyornithidae) (Figure 4).<br />

In the distal end of the humems, Juncitarsus differs from the<br />

Presbyornithidae in having the attachment area of the anterior<br />

articular ligament of Howard (1929) much more elevated and<br />

lateromedially narrow; the processus flexorius not as ventrally<br />

Juncitarsus Presbyornis<br />

FIGURE 3.—Left scapula in dorsal view. Juncitarsus gracillimus: USNM<br />

468466. Presbyornis pervetus: UCMP 126193 (in mirror image).<br />

(a-craniodorsal margin.)<br />

protmding; probably a well-developed sulcus for M. scapulohumeralis,<br />

which is lacking in the Presbyornithidae; and the<br />

two scars for M. flexor carpi ulnaris on the processus flexorius<br />

distinctly unequal in size (the posterior is considerably larger),<br />

whereas these scars are of about equal size in the Presbyornithidae,<br />

or the anterior is the larger (Figure 5).<br />

ULNA.—I have found no distinctive differences in the proximal<br />

end, maybe due to the poor preservation of the only specimen<br />

of Juncitarsus available. In the distal end, the tuberculum<br />

carpale is short and directed cranially, not clearly craniodistally<br />

as in Presbyornis (proximodistally much longer and blunter in<br />

Telmabates).<br />

RADIALE.—Although generally very similar, Juncitarsus<br />

differs from Presbyornis (the only presbyornithid genus in<br />

which this bone is known) in lacking the deep excavation of the<br />

dorsal side and in having the incisure at the cranial side deeply<br />

cut and not as wide (Figure 6).<br />

CARPOMETACARPUS.—The only proximal end known of<br />

Juncitarsus has the cranial margin of trochlea carpalis (bordering<br />

the anterior carpal fossa) convex, not deeply concave as in<br />

the Presbyornithidae (Figure 7). No difference has been found<br />

in the distal end of the carpometacarpus.<br />

FEMUR.—The femur of Juncitarsus seems to be more robust<br />

than that in the Presbyornithidae. Furthermore, the femoral<br />

neck in Juncitarsus is broader in proximal view; the impressiones<br />

iliotrochanterici show a very different pattern than in the<br />

Presbyornithidae; and the trochlea fibularis is concave, or flat,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!