03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

246 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY<br />

study, it has been possible to include first-hand observations<br />

only for presbyomithids collected in the New World.<br />

Presbyornithidae<br />

Presbyornis pervetus Wetmore: CM 11360 (holotype),<br />

11358, 11359, 11360a, 12032, 12033, 12035-12038; UCMP<br />

119394-119401, 126173-126257; USNM 492550^192552;<br />

UW 20593-20600, 20651-20653, 20655-20666.<br />

Telmabates antiquus Howard: AMNH 3170 (holotype),<br />

3166-3187,3225-3227.<br />

Phoenicopteridae<br />

Juncitarsus gracillimus Olson and Feduccia: USNM<br />

244318 (holotype), 244319-244322, 244324-244338<br />

(paratypes).<br />

Juncitarsus cf. merkeli Peters: Buffalo Museum E 25106<br />

(cast in USNM), referred to this taxon by Peters (1987). Only<br />

the published description was available of the German holotype<br />

of J. merkeli Peters (1987).<br />

Previously unrecognized specimens of Juncitarsus from<br />

Eocene deposits in Wyoming were discovered in the collections<br />

of the National Museum of Natural History and the<br />

American Museum of Natural History and are described herein.<br />

Both were allocated to the genus Juncitarsus through comparisons<br />

with the type material of J. gracillimus. Although they<br />

are too large to be conspecific with J. gracillimus, they agree<br />

well in size with J. merkeli. Most skeletal elements present in<br />

the new specimens have already been described (forming the<br />

foundation for their allocation to Juncitarsus). A few previously<br />

unknown, or poorly described elements do occur among the<br />

new material.<br />

Genus Juncitarsus Olson and Feduccia, 1980<br />

Juncitarsus cf. merkeli Peters, 1987<br />

REFERRED MATERIAL.—USNM 468466, apparently associated<br />

material consisting of symphyseal part of furcula, parts of<br />

costal region and manubrium of sternum, anterior part of left<br />

scapula, complete right coracoid, sternal part of left coracoid,<br />

caput of right humems, proximal half of left humems, distal<br />

end of right radius, distal end of right carpometacarpus, right<br />

phalanx 1 of digit II, right phalanx 2 of digit II, complete right<br />

femur, complete left femur, lateral condyle of right tibiotarsus,<br />

distal end of right tarsometatarsus, and four pedal phalanges.<br />

Collected in Wyoming, Uinta County, Wildcat Butte, section 1,<br />

T. 17 N, R. 113 W, 1 mile south of Church Butte, "very low exposures,"<br />

on 2 August 1959 by CL. Gazin.<br />

A second lot of material consists of the following: part of<br />

manubrial region of sternum, AMNH 16232; anterior part of<br />

left scapula, AMNH 6046; distal end of right ulna, AMNH<br />

5956; proximal end of right radius, AMNH 6025; part of proximal<br />

end of left carpometacarpus, AMNH 6028; proximal half of<br />

right femur, AMNH 16231; part of proximal end of left femur,<br />

AMNH 6007; distal ends of right and left femoras, AMNH<br />

5998; and part of shaft of tarsometatarsus, AMNH 7730.<br />

AMNH 5956-7730 were collected in 1906 by Walter Granger<br />

in Wyoming, Sweetwater County, Washakie Basin, 100 ft<br />

above the brown sandstone north of Haystack Mountain. They<br />

were found in the Washakie Formation, which is of Bridgerian<br />

age. AMNH 16231-16232 were collected at an unknown date<br />

in Wyoming, Sweetwater County, Washakie Basin, north of<br />

Haystack Mountain.<br />

DISTRIBUTION.—Early to middle Eocene in Wyoming and<br />

Germany.<br />

DIAGNOSIS.—The collections are referred to the genus Juncitarsus<br />

based on the skeletal characteristics described in<br />

"Comparative Osteology," below. The specimens are tentatively<br />

referred to Juncitarsus merkeli Peters, 1987, based on their<br />

overall similarity in size to this species, being markedly larger<br />

than Juncitarsus gracillimus. Very few measurements can be<br />

directly compared, however. The middle trochlea of tarsometatarsus<br />

USNM 468466 is 4.4 mm wide (3.9 mm in Juncitarsus<br />

gracillimus), and the inner trochlea is 6.9 mm deep (6.3 mm in<br />

J. gracillimus).<br />

REMARKS.—The two collections may consist of remains<br />

from a single individual each. The two finds from Wyoming<br />

described herein, together with the Buffalo Museum specimen,<br />

referred to J. merkeli by Peters (1987), corroborate the intercontinental<br />

distribution of Juncitarsus. The Buffalo Museum<br />

specimen from the early Eocene Green River Formation of<br />

Wyoming shows that Juncitarsus and Presbyornis did overlap<br />

in time and space, although the latter seems not to have persisted<br />

into the middle Eocene, when Juncitarsus became more<br />

abundant.<br />

Comparative Osteology<br />

The characteristics described herein are only those that show<br />

no overlap between Juncitarsus and the Presbyornithidae;<br />

however, only a very few specimens exist for comparing Juncitarsus<br />

with the abundant material of the Presbyornithidae. Although<br />

the morphological range in the Presbyornithidae is unlikely<br />

to change dramatically with the addition of more<br />

specimens, the situation could change for Juncitarsus, and with<br />

more material, additional aspects of its morphology may overlap<br />

with the Presbyornithidae.<br />

The most obvious difference between Presbyornis and Juncitarsus<br />

is the typical desmognathous, duck-like head of the<br />

former, in contrast to the schizognathous skull as shown in the<br />

holotype of Juncitarsus merkeli (Olson and Feduccia, 1980;<br />

Peters, 1987). The cranium of Juncitarsus gracillimus is almost<br />

unknown. Despite the striking differences in cranial morphology,<br />

the two taxa are very similar postcranially in several respects.<br />

Although many of these similarities may be due to symplesiomorphy,<br />

i.e., the retention of primitive morphologies, it<br />

can be fairly assumed they also bear witness to a common ancestor<br />

not too far removed in time. The Presbyornithidae have<br />

been demonstrated to have an anseriform affinity (Ericson,<br />

1997), whereas Juncitarsus is thought to have its closest living

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!