PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
204 is about 80% of the external tarsal length of females of Megapodius laperouse laperouse (50-55 mm), the smallest living species of megapode. The proximal and distal widths of the tarsometatarsus of Ngawupodius are proportionally great compared to its total length: about 21% for both measurements, at the top of the range among megapodes (15%-21%). Likewise, Ngawupodius has a proportionally wide middle shaft (10.6% of total length, range of megapodes 6%-ll%; 45% of distal width, 38%-45% in other species). In these proportions Ngawupodius resembles only Leipoa (Figure ID). Comparisons with Progura are not possible from existing material. The structure and length of the tarsometatarsus in Leipoa may be related to its more open habitat, and the resemblances to Ngawupodius could be coincidental. Given what is known of living species, a general range of size can be proposed for Ngawupodius. If it had disproportionally short legs, as in Leipoa, then it may have been similar in body length and weight to the smallest species of Megapodius. If the leg proportions were more typical of the other megapodes, then estimates of about 225-235 mm overall length and 230-330 g are reasonable. The small, undescribed species of Megapodius from 'Eua, Tonga, appears to have been of comparable size to Ngawupodius minya (D. Steadman, pers. comm., 1996). On the basis of pollen of grasses and subtropical rainforest flora from the lower member of the Namba Formation, Tedford et al. (1977:56) suggested a paleohabitat of "riparian forests with savannas on better drained fluviatiles." Some related but specifically distinct mammals in the faunas of the two members were inferred by Tedford et al. (1977) to indicate that the division between them recorded both a change in the depositional environment and a significant time gap. If the general vegetation in the upper member remained much the same as that suggested by the pollen from the lower member, then it is tempting to envisage a situation much like that in northern Australia today. The Orange-footed Scrubfowl, Megapodius reinwardt, frequents riparian forests bordered by tropical savanna woodland. Ngawupodius may have occupied a similar habitat in the Oligocene environment of Lake Pinpa. Balouet, Jean Christophe, and Storrs L. Olson 1989. Fossil Birds from Late Quaternary Deposits in New Caledonia. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 469:38 pages, 16 figures. Baumel, Julian J., and Lawrence M. Witmer 1993. Osteologia. In J.J. Baumel, A.S. King, J.E. Breazile, H.E. Evans, and C. Vanden Berge, editors, Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina Anatomica Avium. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, 23:45-132, figures 4.1—4.18. Boles, Walter E., and Brian Mackness 1994. Birds from the Bluff Downs Local Fauna, Allingham Formation. Literature Cited SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY The extinction of Ngawupodius was neither through competition with pheasants nor predation by felids. The only phasianids known from the Australian fossil record or occurring in a natural state in Australia today are small quail of the genus Coturnix (up to 120 g). These are too small to compete actively with megapodes, even Ngawupodius. Coturnix is known from other late-Oligocene-aged central Australian sites, although not Lake Pinpa. Pheasants, partridges, or other galliforms of a size comparable to any of the megapodes are not known from Australia. Likewise, the Felidae and Viverridae do not occur in Australia, and there is no evidence that marsupial carnivores have a particularly deleterious effect on megapode populations. Marsupial carnivores were well represented in Australia during the Oligocene and also have been found in the Ericmas Fauna (Dasyuridae). If it left no descendants, the eventual extinction of Ngawupodius may be related to a changing environment. With the late Miocene drying of Australia, the wet forest vegetation that apparently was its habitat was lost from the center of the continent. Similar habitats are now restricted to parts of eastern and northern Australia. Other central Australian birds that were lost after these climatic alterations were aquatic forms (e.g., flamingos, Phoenicopteridae). It is not yet possible to verify the loss of other terrestrial birds because these are not well represented, and existing material has yet to be studied in any depth. The morphology of Ngawupodius holds no clues to its relationships within the family; it shares osteological characters with most genera of megapodes. Until a complete phylogenetic analysis of the Megapodiidae is performed, the polarities of these characters will not be known. Likewise, whether Ngawupodius was ancestral to any of the living forms, and if so, how directly, cannot be determined. Similarities in proportions and its occurrence in central Australia raise the possibility that Ngawupodius may have been a direct ancestor of Leipoa. Conversely, Ngawupodius may have represented a distinct lineage within the family. There is general agreement that, regardless of their center of origin, megapodes were isolated in Australo-Papua for an extended period, which we know now to extend at least to the late Oligocene, Ngawupodius being the oldest known member of the Megapodiidae. Records of the South Australian Museum, 27(2): 139-149,2 figures. Brom, T.G., and R.W.R.J. Dekker 1992. Current Studies on Megapode Phylogeny. In R.W.R.J. Dekker and D.N. Jones, editors, Proceedings of the First International Megapode Symposium, Christchurch, New Zealand, December 1990. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 278:7-17, figures 1-5. Callen, Roger A., and Richard H. Tedford 1976. New Late Cainozoic Rock Units and Depositional Environments, Lake Frome Area, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 100(3): 125-168, 24 figures.
NUMBER 89 205 Clark, George A., Jr. 1964a. Ontogeny and Evolution in the Megapodes (Aves: Galliformes). Postilla, 78: 37 pages, 11 figures. 1964b. Life Histories and the Evolution of Megapodes. The Living Bird, 3:149-167, 15 figures. Cracraft, Joel 1973. Continental Drift, Paleoclimatology, and the Evolution and Biogeography of Birds. Journal of Zoology, London, 169(4):455-545, 20 figures, del Hoyo, Josep, Andrew Elliot, and Jordi Sargatal, editors 1994. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume 2: New World Vultures to Guineafowl. 638 pages, 60 plates. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. Dekker, Ren£ W.R.J. 1989. Predation and the Western Limits of Megapode Distribution (Megapodiidae; Aves). Journal of Biogeography, 16(4):317-321, 2 figures. Dekker, R.W.R.J., and T.G. Brom 1992. Megapode Phylogeny and the Interpretation of Incubation Strategies. In R.W.R.J. Dekker and D.N. Jones, editors, Proceedings of the First International Megapode Symposium, Christchurch, New Zealand, December 1990. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 278:19-31, figures 6-11. De Vis, C.W. 1888. Australian Ancestry of the Crowned Pigeon of New Guinea. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland, 5(4): 127-131. 1889. Additions to the List of Fossil Birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland, 6(l):55-58. Gaillard, C. 1908. Les oiseaux des Phosphorites du Quercy. Annates de I 'Universite de Lyon, new series, 1(23): 1-100. Jones, Darryl N., Rene W.R.J. Dekker, and Cees S. Roselaar 1995. The Megapodes. 262 pages, 8 plates. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Longman, H.A. 1945. Fossil Vertebrates from Gore Quarries. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 12(3): 164. Lydekker, Richard 1891. Catalogue of the Fossil Birds in the British Museum (Natural History). 368 pages, 75 figures. London: British Museum (Natural History). Marchant, Stephen, and Peter J. Higgins, editors 1993. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds, Volume 2: Raptors to Lapwings. 984 pages, 68 plates. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Mourer-Chauvire, Cecile 1982. Les oiseaux fossiles des Phosphorites du Quercy (Eocene superieur a Oligocene superieur): Implications paleobiogeographiques. In E. Buffetaut, P. Janvier, J.C. Rage, and P. Tassy, Phylogenie et Paleobiogeographie: Livre jubilaire en l'honneur de Robert Hoffstetter. Geobios, special memoir, 6:413-426, 3 figures. 1992. The Galliformes (Aves) from the Phosphorites du Quercy (France): Systematics and Biostratigraphy. In K.E. Campbell, Jr., editor, Papers in Avian Paleontology Honoring Pierce Brodkorb. Science Series, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 36:67-95, 14 figures. Olson, Storrs L. 1980. The Significance of the Distribution of the Megapodiidae. Emu, 80(l):21-24, 1 figure. 1985. The Fossil Record of Birds. In D.S. Farner, J.R. King, and K.C. Parkes, editors, Avian Biology, 8:79-238, 11 figures. New York: Academic Press. Peter, J.M., and M.B. Peter 1993. Appendix III: Aboriginal Names. In Stephen Marchant and Peter J. Higgins, editors, Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Ant arctic Birds, Volume 2: Raptors to Lapwings, pages 971-973. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Peters, James Lee 1934. Family Megapodiidae. In Check-list of Birds of the World, 2:3-9. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Poplin, Francois 1980. Sylviomis neocaledoniae n.g. n.sp.; ratite eteint de la Nouvelle Caledonie. Comptes Rendus de I'Academie des Sciences de Paris, series D, 290:489-492, 4 figures. Poplin, Francois, and Cecile Mourer-Chauvire 1985. Sylviomis neocaledoniae (Aves, Galliformes, Megapodiidae), oiseaux g6ant Eteint de l'ile de Pins (Nouvelle-Caledonie). Geobios,\%(\):13-91, 8 figures, 4 plates. Reed, A.W. 1977. Aboriginal Words and Place Names. 286 pages. Adelaide: Rigby. Rich, Thomas H., Michael Archer, Suzanne J. Hand, Henk Godthelp, Jeannette Muirhead, Neville S. Pledge, Timothy F. Flannery, Michael O. Woodburne, Judd A. Case, Richard H. Tedford, William D. Turnbull, Ernest L. Lundelius, Jr., Leallyn S.V. Rich, Michael J. Whitelaw, Anne Kemp, and Patricia V. Rich 1991. Australian Mesozoic and Tertiary Ten-estrial Mammal Localities. In P.V. Vickers-Rich, J.M. Monaghan, R.F. Baird, and T.H. Rich, editors, Vertebrate Palaeontology of Australasia, pages 1005-1070. Melbourne: Thomas Nelson. Roselaar, CS. 1994. Systematic Notes on Megapodiidae (Aves, Galliformes), Including the Description of Five New Subspecies. Bulletin, Zoologisch Museum, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 14(2):9-36, 8 figures. Sibley, Charles G., and Jon E. Ahlquist 1990. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution. 976 pages, 385 figures. New Haven: Yale University Press. Sibley, Charles G., and Burt L. Monroe, Jr. 1990. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. 1111 pages. New Haven: Yale University Press. Steadman, David W. 1980. A Review of the Osteology and Paleontology of Turkeys (Aves: Meleagridinae). In K.E. Campbell, Jr., editor, Papers in Avian Paleontology Honoring Hildegard Howard. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 330:131-207, 14 figures. 1989. New Species and Records of Birds (Aves: Megapodiidae, Columbidae) from an Archaeological Site on Lifuka, Tonga. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 102(3):537—552, 7 figures. 1993a. Biogeography of Tongan Birds Before and After Human Impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 90:818-822, 1 figure. 1993b. Bird Bones from the To'aga Site: Prehistoric Loss of Seabirds and Megapodes. In P.V. Kirch and T.L. Hunt, editors, The To'aga Site: Three Millennia of Polynesian Occupation in the Manu'a Islands, American Samoa. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Berkeley, 51:217-228, 2 figures. 1995. Prehistoric Extinctions of Pacific Island Birds: Biodiversity Meets Zooarchaeology. Science, 267:1123-1131,4 figures. Tedford, Richard H., Michael Archer, Allan Bartholomai, Michael Plane, Neville S. Pledge, Thomas H. Rich, Patricia Rich, and Rod T. Wells 1977. The Discovery of Miocene Vertebrates, Lake Frome Area, South Australia. BMR Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 2:53-57, 3 figures, van Tets, G.F. 1974. A Revision of the Fossil Megapodiidae (Aves), Including a Description of a New Species of Progura De Vis. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 98(4):213-224, 5 figures. 1984. A Checklist of Extinct Fossil Australasian Birds. In M. Archer and G. Clayton, editors, Vertebrate Zoogeography and Evolution in
- Page 163 and 164: NUMBER 89 153 FIGURE 12.—Area of
- Page 165 and 166: NUMBER 89 155 the period studied. T
- Page 167: NUMBER 89 157 Walker, C.A., G.M. Wr
- Page 170 and 171: 160 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 172 and 173: 162 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 174 and 175: 164 Vl 620 M 570 £ 520 S 470f •
- Page 176 and 177: 166 birds, such as the two species
- Page 178 and 179: 168 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 180 and 181: 170 cional Autonoma de Mexico, for
- Page 182 and 183: 172 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 184 and 185: 174 ated with this specimen, see Mi
- Page 187 and 188: The Fossil Record of Condors (Cicon
- Page 189 and 190: NUMBER 89 179 FIGURE 2.—Geographi
- Page 191 and 192: NUMBER 89 181 FIGURE 5.—Vulturida
- Page 193 and 194: NUMBER 89 183 FIGURE 7.—Referred
- Page 195 and 196: Two New Fossil Eagles from the Late
- Page 197 and 198: NUMBER 89 187 TABLE 1.—Measuremen
- Page 199 and 200: NUMBER 89 189 carpal trochlea relat
- Page 201 and 202: NUMBER 89 191 FIGURE 4.—Holotypic
- Page 203 and 204: NUMBER 89 193 We compared the parat
- Page 205 and 206: NUMBER 89 195 FIGURE 6.—Distribut
- Page 207 and 208: NUMBER 89 197 the Florida State Mus
- Page 209 and 210: A New Genus of Dwarf Megapode (Gall
- Page 211 and 212: NUMBER 89 201 lis hypotarsi along t
- Page 213: NUMBER 89 203 The fossil is larger
- Page 217 and 218: A New Genus and Species of the Fami
- Page 219 and 220: NUMBER 89 209 son with other known
- Page 221 and 222: NUMBER 89 211 FIGURE 1.—Argornis
- Page 223 and 224: NUMBER 89 213 AM AL AM AL AM AL AM
- Page 225 and 226: NUMBER 89 215 caput humeri perpendi
- Page 227 and 228: Selmes absurdipes, New Genus, New S
- Page 229 and 230: NUMBER 89 219 FIGURE 2.—Selmes ab
- Page 231 and 232: NUMBER 89 221 Costae: Deformed frag
- Page 233 and 234: A Fossil Screamer (Anseriformes: An
- Page 235 and 236: NUMBER 89 FIGURE 3.—Chaunoides an
- Page 237 and 238: NUMBER 89 227 B C D FIGURE 6.—The
- Page 239 and 240: NUMBER 89 229 FIGURE 9.—Right tib
- Page 241 and 242: The Anseriform Relationships of Ana
- Page 243 and 244: NUMBER 89 233 Subfamily ANATALAVINA
- Page 245 and 246: NUMBER 89 235 mal was found under t
- Page 247 and 248: NUMBER 89 237 tion, with retroartic
- Page 249 and 250: NUMBER 89 FIGURE 7.—Sternum and p
- Page 251 and 252: NUMBER 89 241 der. The bone is very
- Page 253: NUMBER 89 243 Eocene records of the
- Page 256 and 257: 246 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 258 and 259: 248 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 260 and 261: 250 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 263 and 264: Presbyornis isoni and Other Late Pa
204<br />
is about 80% of the external tarsal length of females of Megapodius<br />
laperouse laperouse (50-55 mm), the smallest living<br />
species of megapode. The proximal and distal widths of the tarsometatarsus<br />
of Ngawupodius are proportionally great compared<br />
to its total length: about 21% for both measurements, at<br />
the top of the range among megapodes (15%-21%). Likewise,<br />
Ngawupodius has a proportionally wide middle shaft (10.6% of<br />
total length, range of megapodes 6%-ll%; 45% of distal<br />
width, 38%-45% in other species). In these proportions<br />
Ngawupodius resembles only Leipoa (Figure ID). Comparisons<br />
with Progura are not possible from existing material. The<br />
structure and length of the tarsometatarsus in Leipoa may be<br />
related to its more open habitat, and the resemblances to<br />
Ngawupodius could be coincidental.<br />
Given what is known of living species, a general range of<br />
size can be proposed for Ngawupodius. If it had disproportionally<br />
short legs, as in Leipoa, then it may have been similar in<br />
body length and weight to the smallest species of Megapodius.<br />
If the leg proportions were more typical of the other megapodes,<br />
then estimates of about 225-235 mm overall length and<br />
230-330 g are reasonable. The small, undescribed species of<br />
Megapodius from 'Eua, Tonga, appears to have been of comparable<br />
size to Ngawupodius minya (D. Steadman, pers.<br />
comm., 1996).<br />
On the basis of pollen of grasses and subtropical rainforest<br />
flora from the lower member of the Namba Formation, Tedford<br />
et al. (1977:56) suggested a paleohabitat of "riparian forests<br />
with savannas on better drained fluviatiles." Some related but<br />
specifically distinct mammals in the faunas of the two members<br />
were inferred by Tedford et al. (1977) to indicate that the<br />
division between them recorded both a change in the depositional<br />
environment and a significant time gap. If the general<br />
vegetation in the upper member remained much the same as<br />
that suggested by the pollen from the lower member, then it is<br />
tempting to envisage a situation much like that in northern<br />
Australia today. The Orange-footed Scrubfowl, Megapodius<br />
reinwardt, frequents riparian forests bordered by tropical savanna<br />
woodland. Ngawupodius may have occupied a similar<br />
habitat in the Oligocene environment of Lake Pinpa.<br />
Balouet, Jean Christophe, and Storrs L. Olson<br />
1989. Fossil Birds from Late Quaternary Deposits in New Caledonia.<br />
<strong>Smithsonian</strong> Contributions to Zoology, 469:38 pages, 16 figures.<br />
Baumel, Julian J., and Lawrence M. Witmer<br />
1993. Osteologia. In J.J. Baumel, A.S. King, J.E. Breazile, H.E. Evans,<br />
and C. Vanden Berge, editors, Handbook of Avian Anatomy: Nomina<br />
Anatomica Avium. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological<br />
Club, 23:45-132, figures 4.1—4.18.<br />
Boles, Walter E., and Brian Mackness<br />
1994. Birds from the Bluff Downs <strong>Lo</strong>cal Fauna, Allingham Formation.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY<br />
The extinction of Ngawupodius was neither through competition<br />
with pheasants nor predation by felids. The only phasianids<br />
known from the Australian fossil record or occurring in a<br />
natural state in Australia today are small quail of the genus<br />
Coturnix (up to 120 g). These are too small to compete actively<br />
with megapodes, even Ngawupodius. Coturnix is known from<br />
other late-Oligocene-aged central Australian sites, although not<br />
Lake Pinpa. Pheasants, partridges, or other galliforms of a size<br />
comparable to any of the megapodes are not known from Australia.<br />
Likewise, the Felidae and Viverridae do not occur in<br />
Australia, and there is no evidence that marsupial carnivores<br />
have a particularly deleterious effect on megapode populations.<br />
Marsupial carnivores were well represented in Australia during<br />
the Oligocene and also have been found in the Ericmas Fauna<br />
(Dasyuridae).<br />
If it left no descendants, the eventual extinction of Ngawupodius<br />
may be related to a changing environment. With the late<br />
Miocene drying of Australia, the wet forest vegetation that apparently<br />
was its habitat was lost from the center of the continent.<br />
Similar habitats are now restricted to parts of eastern and<br />
northern Australia. Other central Australian birds that were lost<br />
after these climatic alterations were aquatic forms (e.g., flamingos,<br />
Phoenicopteridae). It is not yet possible to verify the loss<br />
of other terrestrial birds because these are not well represented,<br />
and existing material has yet to be studied in any depth.<br />
The morphology of Ngawupodius holds no clues to its relationships<br />
within the family; it shares osteological characters<br />
with most genera of megapodes. Until a complete phylogenetic<br />
analysis of the Megapodiidae is performed, the polarities of<br />
these characters will not be known. Likewise, whether<br />
Ngawupodius was ancestral to any of the living forms, and if<br />
so, how directly, cannot be determined. Similarities in proportions<br />
and its occurrence in central Australia raise the possibility<br />
that Ngawupodius may have been a direct ancestor of Leipoa.<br />
Conversely, Ngawupodius may have represented a distinct lineage<br />
within the family. There is general agreement that, regardless<br />
of their center of origin, megapodes were isolated in Australo-Papua<br />
for an extended period, which we know now to<br />
extend at least to the late Oligocene, Ngawupodius being the<br />
oldest known member of the Megapodiidae.<br />
Records of the South Australian Museum, 27(2): 139-149,2 figures.<br />
Brom, T.G., and R.W.R.J. Dekker<br />
1992. Current Studies on Megapode Phylogeny. In R.W.R.J. Dekker and<br />
D.N. Jones, editors, Proceedings of the First International Megapode<br />
Symposium, Christchurch, New Zealand, December 1990. Zoologische<br />
Verhandelingen, 278:7-17, figures 1-5.<br />
Callen, Roger A., and Richard H. Tedford<br />
1976. New Late Cainozoic Rock Units and Depositional Environments,<br />
Lake Frome Area, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society<br />
of South Australia, 100(3): 125-168, 24 figures.