03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

ated with this specimen, see Miller and Carranza-Castaneda<br />

(1984).<br />

Right carpometacarpus: Fragmentary proximal end, including<br />

only trochlea carpalis and area immediately distal to it,<br />

Florida Museum of Natural History, UF 123874, Leisey Shell<br />

Pit 3, Hillsborough County, Florida, Bermont Formation, Irvingtonian<br />

(between 1.66 and 1.4 Ma (MacFadden, 1995)).<br />

This specimen was originally described and figured by<br />

Emslie (1995:316-317), who referred it to Teratornis sp. cf. T.<br />

incredibilis on the basis of its similarity to Teratornis merriami<br />

and its size (-40% larger than T. merriami). We see no reason<br />

to doubt that this specimen is a teratorn, but little else can be<br />

said about it.<br />

Discussion<br />

Howard (1952) described Teratornis incredibilis on the basis<br />

of the complete os carpi ulnare (cuneiform) noted above, allocating<br />

the species to Teratornis on the basis of its general similarity<br />

to T. merriami. The much greater size of the specimen<br />

(43% larger than the same bone of T. merriami) and other characters<br />

clearly established its distinction as a separate species<br />

(Howard, 1952). Howard (1963, 1972) also referred to Teratornis<br />

incredibilis the distal end of a radius and the anterior portion<br />

of a beak discussed above on the basis of their general similarity<br />

to T. merriami and the fact that both of these specimens<br />

were about 40% larger than comparable bones of the latter species.<br />

Although Howard (1972:343) considered the possibility<br />

of generic separation of the larger species from Teratornis, she<br />

considered all three specimens she had assigned to T. incredibilis<br />

too undiagnostic or too poorly preserved to justify establishing<br />

a new genus.<br />

After restudying the holotype and three specimens previously<br />

referred to Teratornis incredibilis we concluded that the differences<br />

seen between T. incredibilis and T. merriami are such<br />

that the erection of a new genus for the former was warranted.<br />

In reexamining the holotypical os carpi ulnare we found that<br />

the characters noted above for Aiolornis differ from those of<br />

Teratornis at a level comparable to the differences seen among<br />

the os carpi ulnare of the living genera of the family Vulturidae,<br />

which are easily identified to genus, and the differences<br />

hold for all specimens of the element from Rancho La Brea examined<br />

(n=24). The unique characters of the humerus, ulna, radius,<br />

and carpometacarpus assigned to Aiolornis incredibilis,<br />

however, suggest that that species may have had different flight<br />

adaptations from Teratornis merriami. Because the os carpi<br />

ulnare is a bone integral to the flight of any bird, we would<br />

have expected greater character differences to be reflected in<br />

the os carpi ulnare of Aiolornis, which would serve to separate<br />

it more readily from Teratornis. For this reason we would not<br />

be surprised to find in the future that the older (Blancan and<br />

Irvingtonian) specimens herein referred to Aiolornis incredibilis<br />

actually are referrable to another genus and species.<br />

SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY<br />

The other genus and species of teratorn, Cathartomis gracilis,<br />

is known only from tarsometatarsi, one complete and one<br />

distal end, from the late Pleistocene asphalt deposits at Rancho<br />

La Brea, California. Although the length of the holotypical tarsometatarsus<br />

of C. gracilis falls within the size range of tarsometatarsi<br />

of Teratornis merriami, it is much more slender<br />

and has several features that distinguish it from its more heavily<br />

built contemporary. Miller and Howard (1938:169) reevaluated<br />

the status of Cathartomis and concluded "that Cathartornis<br />

is markedly similar to Teratornis merriami, though it is<br />

undoubtedly a distinct species. We consider it also to be generically<br />

distinct." Some of the characters listed as separating the<br />

two genera are not particularly convincing, however, and with<br />

more specimens of teratorns available now than at the time of<br />

Miller and Howard's study, the case for maintaining Cathartomis<br />

as a separate genus is weak. <strong>Res</strong>olution of the status of<br />

Cathartomis is deferred pending completion of the studies of<br />

the teratorns of Rancho La Brea by KEC. Given the marked<br />

similarity of Cathartomis to Teratornis, we considered assignment<br />

to Cathartomis of the specimens now referred to Aiolornis<br />

inappropriate.<br />

The size of the Incredible Teratorn, Aiolornis incredibilis, remains<br />

its most remarkable known feature, even though we<br />

know there was at least one larger species of teratorn. Howard<br />

(1952) estimated the size of A. incredibilis to be 43% larger<br />

than Teratornis merriami based on the holotypical os carpi<br />

ulnare, which would give a wingspan of about 5 m. She estimated<br />

(Howard, 1972:343) the radius she referred to A. incredibilis<br />

to be "approximately 40% broader than a large radius of<br />

T. merriami." The beak she referred to A. incredibilis was estimated<br />

to be "43% larger than the largest of four measurable<br />

specimens of T. merriami,'" based on what Howard (1972:343)<br />

considered the best available measurement. The ulna that Jefferson<br />

(1995:94) referred to A. incredibilis was said to be<br />

"about 57% larger than the average (39.6) of five measured<br />

specimens of Teratornis merriami from Rancho La Brea." Unfortunately,<br />

it is not possible to draw a direct size comparison<br />

between the partial humerus of A. incredibilis and humeri of T.<br />

merriami. The only accurate measurements that can be taken<br />

from the holotype of A. incredibilis are the width and depth<br />

near midshaft, and the width to depth proportions of the shaft<br />

are so different among the known genera of teratorns (Figure 3)<br />

as to make such a size comparison meaningless. Neither is it<br />

possible to determine accurately the size of the bird from which<br />

came the carpometacarpi referred to A. incredibilis because of<br />

the poor state of preservation of those specimens. A reasonable<br />

"eyeball" estimate, however, suggests that both of these specimens<br />

came from a bird with a wingspan intermediate between<br />

that of T merriami (3.5-4 m) and Argentavis magnificens (6-8<br />

m). This gives a wingspan estimate of 5.0-5.5 m for A. incredibilis,<br />

which conforms with that estimated from the other specimens<br />

referred to this species.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!