03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NUMBER 89 173<br />

nis but not highly vaulted as in vulturids), with prominent central<br />

ridge, or septum (which is only slightly developed anteriorly<br />

in Teratornis), but lacking distinct median groove posterior<br />

to ridge (as present in Teratornis); crista tomialis wider in<br />

transverse section and more deeply grooved and more symmetrical<br />

anteriorly than in Teratornis but forming comparable enclosure<br />

of deep, narrow channel in anteriormost portion of<br />

beak, in region of sharp curvature.<br />

In teratorns, the crista tomialis forms a sharp ridge external<br />

to the region of the anterior narial border, but farther anterior,<br />

about halfway to tip of beak, this ridge declines in prominence,<br />

and the median portion of the grooved crista tomialis forms a<br />

sharper ridge. The point of this transition represents the posteriormost<br />

portion of this specimen of beak that is preserved,<br />

which suggests that the specimen came from a bird with a proportionately<br />

much deeper beak than seen in Teratornis.<br />

Left ulna: Proximal end and partial proximal shaft (Figure<br />

4), Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Paleontological Collection,<br />

ABDSP (IVCM) 519/5660, from Vallecito member of<br />

the Palm Spring Formation (Woodward, 1963), June Wash<br />

area of the Vallecito-Fish Creek Basin. Specimen from Vallecito<br />

Creek local fauna (Jefferson, 1995), dating to about<br />

1.8-0.9 Ma.<br />

This ulna is severely crushed, but enough of the original<br />

structure remains to determine that it differs from that of Teratornis<br />

by having (1) olecranon long and very broad; (2) cotyla<br />

ventralis lying at a much steeper angle to the long axis of the<br />

shaft; and (3) cotyla dorsalis wider and relatively shallow. Although<br />

the specimen is quite crushed, most of the bone of the<br />

proximal end is present so it is possible to approximate closely<br />

its original shape. The cotyla ventralis may be slightly rotated<br />

as a result of crushing, but the original shape, in ventral view,<br />

is clearly preserved. The amount of bone present suggests that<br />

the proximal end was less deep anterioposteriorly immediately<br />

distal to the cotyla ventralis, and the tuberculum Lig. collat.<br />

ventralis was much less bulbous, than in Teratornis. In addition,<br />

it appears that the olecranon was much more compressed<br />

anteroposteriorly, although some post-mortem crushing has<br />

taken place.<br />

A total of about 26 cm of the ulna is preserved, in four pieces,<br />

although only two of the four pieces actually fit together.<br />

Two of the shaft fragments have feather papillae, but the smallest<br />

does not. The small diameter of the smallest fragment,<br />

which has no recognizable features, suggests that it may not<br />

even be part of the ulna, an idea supported by the presence of a<br />

fifth fragment that is unidentifiable to element, but which is<br />

definitely not part of an ulna.<br />

Right carpometacarpus: Fragmentary distal end, Universidad<br />

Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Geologia,<br />

Museo de Paleontologia, IGCU-6133, from locality GTO.31,<br />

Blancan, Rancho Viejo area, State of Gaunajuato, Mexico,<br />

about 240 km NNW of Mexico, Distrito Federal.<br />

This specimen is too fragmentary to provide much information,<br />

but it is clearly a teratorn. It differs from carpometacarpi<br />

of Teratornis by having (1) the facies articularis digitalis major<br />

with the medial rise more elongated and elevated and more distinctly<br />

set off from the anterior portion; and (2) the os metacarpale<br />

minoris with the distal area of fusion with the os metacarpale<br />

majus proportionately shorter than in Teratornis and the<br />

distal end more massive, projecting distad more distinctly and<br />

at a greater angle from the os metacarpale majus. The single<br />

known partial carpometacarpus of Argentavis is too poorly preserved<br />

for comparison. For further details on the fauna associ-<br />

FIGURE 4.—A,B, proximal end of the ulna referred to Aiolornis incredibilis<br />

(ABDSP(IVCM) 519/5660): A, anterior view; B, ventral view. C,D, ulna of Teratornis<br />

merriami (George C. Page Museum, B124): c, anterior view; D, ventral<br />

view. Note the differences between the olecranons and the orientation of the<br />

cotylae ventralis. Scale bar=3 cm.<br />

B

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!