03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

162 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY<br />

TABLE 2.—Chronology and location of fossils samples (including ones discussed from literature).<br />

Site<br />

Remouchamps, Belgium<br />

Merlin's Cave, England<br />

Mamutowa Cave, Poland<br />

Pin Hole Cave, England<br />

La Balme-les-Grottes, France<br />

La Colombiere, France<br />

Gigny, France<br />

La Fage, France<br />

Westbury-sub-Mendip, England<br />

Rebielice Krolewskie, Poland<br />

late glacial<br />

Stratigraphic Position<br />

late glacial<br />

Vistulian (Upper pleniglacial)<br />

Devensian<br />

"Wurm IV" (late glacial)<br />

"Wurm IV" (late glacial)<br />

"Wurm II"<br />

"Rissian"<br />

Early Anglian (oxygen isotope stage 12)<br />

Biozone MNI6<br />

Laura Kaagan and Simeon Mellalieu for help with the final version<br />

of this paper, and to Janet Stacey for much support and encouragement.<br />

The following people and institutions deserve<br />

thanks for allowing access to both modern and fossil Lagopus<br />

used in this analysis: Mark Adams, Don Smith, and Robert<br />

Prys-Jones (Subdepartment of Ornithology, Natural History<br />

Museum, Tring); Sandra Chapman and Andy Currant (Palaeontology<br />

Department, The Natural History Museum, <strong>Lo</strong>ndon); Per<br />

Ericson (Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm); Jon Fjeldsa<br />

(Zoologisk Museum, Copenhagen); Derek Yalden (University<br />

of Manchester); Cecile Mourer-Chauvire (Universite Claude-<br />

Bernard, Lyon); Michel Phillipe (Museum d'Histoire Naturelle<br />

de Lyon); Zygmunt Bocheriski (Institute of Systematics and<br />

Evolution of Animals, Kracow); John Nudds (Manchester City<br />

Museum); Chris Hawkes (University of Bristol Speleological<br />

Society Museum); the Musee Royaux d'Art d'Histoire,<br />

Bruxelle; and Ruth Charles (University of Oxford). Finally, I<br />

would like to acknowledge the support of the Natural Environment<br />

<strong>Res</strong>earch Council (NERC) for funding this research and to<br />

acknowledge the financial support from NERC as well as the<br />

Graduate School of University College <strong>Lo</strong>ndon, which allowed<br />

me to present these results at the fourth international meeting of<br />

the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution.<br />

<strong>Res</strong>ults<br />

In Lagopus mutus, there is a noticeable difference in the<br />

mean size of the tarsometatarsi among modern subspecies in<br />

Europe (see Table 1). The Scottish subspecies {L. mutus millaisi)<br />

is larger than populations from Scandinavia {L. m. mutus) or<br />

the Alps (L. m. helveticus). This difference is perhaps best seen<br />

in the length, although the bones appear to be isometric. This<br />

confirms the findings of Bocheriski (1974), although differences<br />

in the means calculated in our two studies exist. Kraft<br />

(1972) alleged differences between nominate L. m. mutus from<br />

Scandinavia and L. m. helveticus from the Alps, but this could<br />

not be confirmed in the present study due to small sample size.<br />

With Lagopus lagopus there appears to be greater overlap<br />

between the samples, although L. I. scoticus is slightly larger<br />

than nominate L. 1. lagopus. The single specimen of L. I. major<br />

Reference<br />

Hedges etal., 1994<br />

Housley, 1991<br />

Bocheriski, 1974<br />

Jacobi, pers. comm., 1996<br />

Mourer-Chauvire, 1975a<br />

Mourer-Chauvire, 1975a<br />

Mourer-Chauvire, 1975a<br />

Chaline, 1975<br />

Currant, pers. comm ., 1996<br />

Bocheriski, 1991<br />

Age<br />

10,330±110yrs. BP<br />

and 10,800±1I10<br />

yrs. BP<br />

10,020±120yrs. BP<br />

ca. 30-15 Ka<br />

ca.100-10 Ka<br />

ca. 15-10 Ka<br />

13,390±300yrs. BP<br />

ca. 30-20 Ka<br />

ca. 300-150 Ka<br />

ca. 500-450 Ka<br />

ca. 3.6-2.4 Ma<br />

is very much larger, although sample size prevents reliable<br />

consideration of this subspecies, which is, however, regarded<br />

as larger by ornithologists (Dement'ev and Gladkov, 1967).<br />

The most apparent difference between modern and fossil<br />

samples of both species of Lagopus is the difference in their<br />

tarsometatarsal-shaft widths (Figure 2). This is almost ubiquitous,<br />

which is important because the modern samples are geographically<br />

widely spaced, and the fossils come from sites of<br />

significantly different ages as well as being widely spaced geographically.<br />

In addition, there is a tendency for fossils of both<br />

taxa from the last glaciation to have shorter tarsometatarsi, thus<br />

making these bones very robust (Figure 2). An exception to<br />

this pattern is provided by the study made by Mourer-Chauvire<br />

(1975a) on a sample from Gigny in France, which, although<br />

from the last (Wurm) glaciation, had relatively long tarsometatarsi.<br />

Tarsometatarsi from La Fage (Rissian) also show this tendency<br />

(Mourer-Chauvire, 1975a; Figure 2). Therefore, length<br />

is probably more variable among fossil populations than is<br />

shaft width.<br />

Given the consistency of greater robustness in Pleistocene<br />

tarsometatarsi of Lagopus, an explanation should be sought.<br />

Although it is conceivable that the species may have changed<br />

through evolution or replacement, both L. lagopus and L. mutus<br />

can be traced from the Pleistocene, suggesting intraspecific<br />

adaptational changes. <strong>Res</strong>earch into bovid limbs and the variables<br />

affecting their morphology has shown that shaft width is<br />

closely correlated with body mass (Scott, 1985) because of<br />

weight-bearing constraints, so the greater robustness of the fossil<br />

tarsometatarsi of Lagopus may reflect greater mean body<br />

weight. To test this hypothesis an attempt was made to assess<br />

the degree to which tarsometatarsal dimensions are correlated<br />

with body weight in modern Lagopus.<br />

Both species of Lagopus are included in this analysis to augment<br />

the size and range of samples. This approach is considered<br />

valid because the relationship should be strictly mechanical<br />

and thus comparable between closely related taxa; it would<br />

seem unlikely that bones of L. lagopus and L. mutus possess<br />

significantly different mechanical properties. Figure 3 shows<br />

that there is a close, positive correlation between bird weights<br />

and their tarsometatarsal-shaft widths (correlation coefficient

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!