03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY<br />

Recent investigations by neontologists into intraspecific<br />

variation in size and allometry, seen across both space and recent<br />

time, emphasize the need for a broader-based approach to<br />

variation seen in fossils. Zink and Remsen's (1986) review of<br />

the relevance of geographic variation to evolution, and case<br />

studies such as those by Johnston and Selander (1964), Grant<br />

(1971, 1986), Fleischer and Johnson (1982), James (1983), and<br />

Dennison and Barker (1991), demonstrate that within-species<br />

morphological differences in birds are frequently observed<br />

across space, and that these differences may evolve over relatively<br />

short spans of time. Analyses of present-day intraspecific<br />

geographic variation therefore give an insight into the spectrum<br />

of variation that may have occurred over recent geological time<br />

in species.<br />

A notable exception to the lack of application of these neontological<br />

studies to fossils or subfossils is the study by Ericson<br />

(1987), wherein subfossil Common Eider {Somateria mollissima<br />

Linnaeus) from Scandinavia were compared to a variety of<br />

different extant subspecies and were shown to differ significantly.<br />

In this instance various environmental criteria were<br />

considered causal, including climatic change and anthropogenic<br />

effects; the author preferred the latter as an explanation.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The present study has attempted to bring together a widely<br />

distributed body of data on both species of Lagopus from the<br />

present-day western Palearctic. These data were used for biometric<br />

comparison with a broader range of geographically and<br />

temporally separated fossils than has been previously achieved.<br />

All but the British and Belgian fossil samples have been metrically<br />

studied by others, although no one has examined all these<br />

samples together. Those that are newly analyzed herein are<br />

from Pin Hole Cave (Manchester City Museum), Merlin's<br />

Cave (University of Bristol Speleological Society Museum),<br />

Westbury-sub-Mendip (Paleontology Department, Natural History<br />

Museum, <strong>Lo</strong>ndon), and Remouchamps (Musee Royaux<br />

d'Art d'Histoire, Bruxelle).<br />

The tarsometatarsus is invariably the most frequently occurring<br />

skeletal element of medium-sized Galliformes in European<br />

cave assemblages (Mourer-Chauvire, 1983) and is thus the<br />

main element dealt with herein. The relative abundance of this<br />

bone is fortunate because it is one of the elements most easily<br />

identified as either Lagopus lagopus or L. mutus (Kraft, 1972;<br />

Mourer-Chauvire, 1975a; Bocheriski, 1985). There appear to<br />

be no details of morphology that can aid determination, and the<br />

two species are identified simply on the basis of size: L. lagopus<br />

is consistently larger than L. mutus (see Figure 2). Many<br />

other postcranial bones present greater problems because they<br />

overlap considerably in size and therefore make analysis more<br />

complicated.<br />

Table 1 lists all the modern skeletal samples of both species,<br />

including two populations of L. lagopus scoticus (Latham), one<br />

from Scotland and one from Derbyshire, England; samples of<br />

TABLE 1.—Mensural data for the tarsometatarsus of modern and fossil samples<br />

of both Lagopus lagopus and L. mutus. See Table 2 for fossil site locations.<br />

Sites that have no mean and have question marks instead of a minimum value<br />

forZ,. lagopus and a maximum value fori, mutus are such because insufficient<br />

tarsometatarsal length difference was present between specimens to define the<br />

respective upper limits of L. lagopus and the lower limits of L. mutus (see Figure<br />

2). (GL=greatest length; KB=shaft width; w=number of specimens.)<br />

Samples<br />

MODERN<br />

Lagopus lagopus lagopus (Scandinavia)<br />

Lagopus lagopus lagopus (Russia)<br />

Lagopus lagopus scoticus (Derbyshire,<br />

England)<br />

Lagopus lagopus scoticus (Scotland)<br />

Lagopus lagopus major (Kazakhstan)<br />

Lagopus mutus mutus (Scandinavia)<br />

Lagopus mutus millaisi (Scotland)<br />

Lagopus mutus helveticus (French Alps)<br />

Lagopus mutus islandorum (Iceland)<br />

FOSSIL<br />

Mamutowa Cave, Lagopus lagopus<br />

Mamutowa Cave, Lagopus mutus<br />

Remouchamps, Lagopus lagopus<br />

Merlin's Cave, Lagopus lagopus<br />

Merlin's Cave, Lagopus mutus<br />

La Balme-les-Grottes, Lagopus lagopus<br />

La Balme-les-Grottes, Lagopus mutus<br />

La Colombiere, Lagopus lagopus<br />

La Colombiere, Lagopus mutus<br />

Pin Hole Cave, Lagopus lagopus<br />

Pin Hole Cave, Lagopus mutus<br />

La Fage, Lagopus lagopus noaillensis<br />

La Fage, Lagopus mutus correzensis<br />

Westbury-sub-Mendip, Lagopus sp.<br />

Rebielice Krolewskie, Lagopus atavus<br />

Minimum-Maximum (n<br />

GL 37.04-42.1 («=11)<br />

KB 2.96-3.34 («= 11)<br />

GL 38.1-42.88 (n=6)<br />

KB 2.84-3.44 (n=5)<br />

GL 38.6-^3.58 (n= 19)<br />

KB 2.94-3.98 (»= 19)<br />

GL 38.38^14.06 («=9)<br />

KB 3.1-3.6 (n=9)<br />

GL 45.32 (n=l)<br />

KB3.64(w=l)<br />

GL 29.44-34.08 («=2)<br />

KB 2.66-2.74 (n=2)<br />

GL 33.22-35.9 (n=5)<br />

KB 2.88-3.12 («=5)<br />

GL 31.8-35.7 (n= 16)<br />

KB 2.46-2.94 (K= 16)<br />

GL 30.18-34.82 (n=2)<br />

KB 2.58-2.86 (n=2)<br />

GL ?-39.84<br />

KB?<br />

GL 32.1-?<br />

KB?<br />

GL 39.44-41.64 («=3)<br />

KB 3.24-3.4 (n=3)<br />

GL ?-40.28<br />

KB?<br />

GL 29.94-?<br />

KB?<br />

GL 36.36-38.8 (n= 10)<br />

KB 3-3.48 (n= 10)<br />

GL 32.24-32.3 (n=2)<br />

KB 3.2 (n=2)<br />

GL 35.2-40.6 (/i=30)<br />

KB 3.04-4.08 («=30)<br />

GL 29.26-33.72 (n=30)<br />

KB 2.6-3.36 (w=30)<br />

GL 36.46-41.32 (n=22)<br />

KB 3.06-3.88 («=22)<br />

GL 30.54-32.98 («=27)<br />

KB 2.74-3.48 (n=27)<br />

GL 36.52-39.3 (n=l)<br />

KB 3.22-3.44 («=7)<br />

GL 31.7-34.8 (n=9)<br />

KB 2.74-3.42 (n=9)<br />

GL-<br />

KB 3.43 (n=2)<br />

GL-<br />

KB3.96(«=1)<br />

Mean<br />

38.95<br />

3.18<br />

40.61<br />

3.19<br />

41.1<br />

3.24<br />

41.1<br />

3.36<br />

-<br />

-<br />

31.76<br />

2.7<br />

34.69<br />

3<br />

33.06<br />

2.71<br />

32.5<br />

2.72<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

40.19<br />

3.3<br />

- --<br />

37.75<br />

3.22<br />

32.27<br />

3.2<br />

38.21<br />

3.4<br />

31.39<br />

3<br />

38.66<br />

3.41<br />

31.85<br />

3.01<br />

38.07<br />

3.33<br />

33.38<br />

3.09<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

L. lagopus lagopus from Scandinavia and Russia; and an individual<br />

skeleton of L. lagopus major <strong>Lo</strong>renz. Lagopus mutus is<br />

represented by skeletons from Scotland {L. m. millaisi Hartert),<br />

Iceland {L. m. islandorum Faber), Scandinavia {L. m. mutus),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!