PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
140 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY FIGURE 1.—The reconstructed "modem range" of Pinguinus impennis in the East Atlantic used to determine areas of sympatry. (•=Holocene subfossil record, A=historical breeding site, x=historical nonbreeding record, ?=occurrence uncertain.) Unfortunately, despite the fact that well over 1000 sites with late Pleistocene avifaunas are known from the West Palearctic, obligate seabirds occur in only a very small proportion of these sites. The main reason for this is the eustatic lowering of sea levels during glacial periods, which means that coastal sites of glacial age are now mostly submerged. Exceptions to this rule are mostly found on steep Mediterranean coasts and in northern Europe (e.g., Norway), where the isostatic rebound of formerly glaciated areas have kept pace with the eustatic rise of the sea level. In one case (Archi, in Calabria, Italy), a glacial coastal site has been preserved through tectonic movements (Ascenzi and Segre, 1971a, 1971b). In principle, interglacial coastal sites should be accessible, but avifaunas of interglacial age are unfortunately extremely rare. The reasons for this are not well understood, but extensive erosion and weathering (near the end of interglacials?), which have destroyed most interglacial cave deposits, are presumably at least a partial explanation.
NUMBER 89 141 METHODS Only strictly marine species are considered in this study to ensure that the occurrence of the birds truly reflects marine conditions. For birds that regularly frequent freshwater or land habitats, occurrence at a site might indicate that suitable freshwater or terrestrial, rather than marine, habitat existed in the vicinity. The species used herein are all Procellariidae, all Hydrobatidae, Moms bassanus, Phalacrocorax aristotelis, Somateria mollissima, Catharacta skua, Larus audouinii, Rissa tridactyla, Pagophila eburnea, and all Alcidae (including Pinguinus). Nomenclature for species' binomials and English names of modern birds follows Sibley and Monroe (1990). With two exceptions, these species are never found inland except as rare vagrants. The exceptions are Somateria mollissima and Rissa tridactyla, which regularly fly over land on migration but rarely stop at inland sites. Xema sabini also might have been included, but it has not yet been recorded from the Pleistocene. Larus hyperboreus has not been included because it can probably not be reliably separated from Larus marinus on osteological criteria. Puffinus puffinus and P. yelkouan have been treated as one species because they were not considered separate species at the time when most of the determinations were made. Only late Pleistocene sites where at least two marine species were reported are included in this study. Data on relevant avifaunas and their dates were obtained through an extensive Site Cyprus Akrotiri Aetokremnos Italy Archi Arene Candide Buca del Bersaglieri Cala Genovesi a Levanzo Grotta dei Fanciulli Grotta Pietro Tampoia Grotta Romanelli Norway Blomvag Skjonghelleren Portugal Grotte de Fuminha Gruta de Figueira Brava Spain Cova den Jaume Orat Cova Nova Cueva de Nerja Devil's Tower Es Pouas Gorham's Cave Great Britain Bacon Hole Creag nan Uamh Paviland Cave Potter's Cave TABLE 1.—Sites with late Pleistocene seabird faunas. Mourer-Chauvire, in litt., 1996 search of the literature. This yielded a total of 22 sites and 31 faunas that fulfill these criteria (Tables 1, 2). At stratified sites, each layer has been considered as a separate fauna. Only late Pleistocene records have been considered, both because dating of older records is usually quite uncertain and because the ecology of the birds may have changed over a longer time interval. For modern distributions, the maps in Cramp (1977, 1983, 1985) were used. These are admittedly only approximate in offshore areas, but because the fossil record necessarily samples the coastal fauna, the nearshore distribution, which is better known, is more significant. It should be noted that the ranges used are the total ranges of the species in question, breeding ranges usually being considerably more restricted. It is, however, only rarely possible to determine whether a fossil is from a breeding bird or not. It should be noted that the ranges in Cramp only define the main area of distribution and that most species are found more or less regularly in small numbers well outside the indicated range. This, of course, introduces a margin of error, but the probability of a rare or vagrant species being preserved as a fossil is certainly very low. For the recently extinct Pinguinus impennis, a "modern" distribution map was compiled from literary and subfossil data (Figure 1). Faunas The faunas (Table 1) are treated in approximately chronological order below. Sources Ascenzi and Segre, 1971a, 1971b; Cassoli and Segre, 1985 Cassoli, 1980 Lambrecht, 1933; Wolf 1938 Cassoli and Tagliacozzo, 1982 Del Campana, 1946 Lambrecht, 1933; Mayaud and Schaub, 1950; Newton, 1922; Wolf, 1938 Cassoli et al., 1979 Lie, 1986; Undas, 1942 Larsen, 1984; Larsen et al., 1987 Lambrecht, 1933; Roche, 1972; Villalta, 1964 Mourer-Chauvire and Antunes, 1991; Mourer Chauvire, in litt., 1995 McMinn etal., 1993 Florit and Alcover, 1987; McMinn and Alcover, 1992 Boessneck and von den Driesch, 1980; Eastham, 1986, 1988, 1989; Hernandez, 1993, 1994, 1995, and in litt. Garrodetal., 1928; Villalta, 1964 Alcover et al., 1981, 1992; Florit etal., 1989 Eastham, 1968, 1989; Vega Toscano, 1990 (dating only) Harrison, 1977, 1987; Stringer et al., 1986 Newton, 1917; Lambrecht, 1933; Wolf, 1938; Stuart, 1983 (dating only) Bell, 1922; Bowen, 1970 (dating only) David, 1991
- Page 99 and 100: NUMBER 89 89 NZA 797,1930,1934 Unco
- Page 101 and 102: NUMBER 89 91 anoramphus spp.), Chat
- Page 103 and 104: NUMBER 89 93 TABLE 2.—Land snails
- Page 105 and 106: NUMBER 89 95 counterparts, with som
- Page 107 and 108: NUMBER 89 population, if such exist
- Page 109 and 110: NUMBER 89 99 FIGURE 11.—Skulls of
- Page 111 and 112: NUMBER 89 101 FIGURE 13.—Lower ma
- Page 113 and 114: NUMBER 89 the Chatham Island Pied O
- Page 115 and 116: NUMBER 89 Locality 9, Western Maung
- Page 117 and 118: NUMBER 89 107 yellowish sand (site
- Page 119: NUMBER 89 109 ogy. Notornis, supple
- Page 122 and 123: 112 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 124 and 125: 114 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 126 and 127: 116 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 128 and 129: 118 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 130 and 131: 120 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 132 and 133: 122 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 135 and 136: The Middle Pleistocene Avifauna of
- Page 137: NUMBER 89 Accordi, B. 1962. La grot
- Page 140 and 141: 130 FIGURE 1.—Map showing locatio
- Page 142 and 143: 132 Cranium Mandibula Scapula Clavi
- Page 144 and 145: 134 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 146 and 147: 136 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 149: Seabirds and Late Pleistocene Marin
- Page 153 and 154: NUMBER 89 143 FIGURE 2.—Area of s
- Page 155 and 156: NUMBER 89 145 FIGURE 4.—Area of s
- Page 157 and 158: NUMBER 89 147 FIGURE 6.—Area of s
- Page 159 and 160: NUMBER 89 149 FIGURE 8.—Area of s
- Page 161 and 162: NUMBER 89 151 FIGURE 10.—Area of
- Page 163 and 164: NUMBER 89 153 FIGURE 12.—Area of
- Page 165 and 166: NUMBER 89 155 the period studied. T
- Page 167: NUMBER 89 157 Walker, C.A., G.M. Wr
- Page 170 and 171: 160 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 172 and 173: 162 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 174 and 175: 164 Vl 620 M 570 £ 520 S 470f •
- Page 176 and 177: 166 birds, such as the two species
- Page 178 and 179: 168 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 180 and 181: 170 cional Autonoma de Mexico, for
- Page 182 and 183: 172 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 184 and 185: 174 ated with this specimen, see Mi
- Page 187 and 188: The Fossil Record of Condors (Cicon
- Page 189 and 190: NUMBER 89 179 FIGURE 2.—Geographi
- Page 191 and 192: NUMBER 89 181 FIGURE 5.—Vulturida
- Page 193 and 194: NUMBER 89 183 FIGURE 7.—Referred
- Page 195 and 196: Two New Fossil Eagles from the Late
- Page 197 and 198: NUMBER 89 187 TABLE 1.—Measuremen
- Page 199 and 200: NUMBER 89 189 carpal trochlea relat
NUMBER 89 141<br />
METHODS<br />
Only strictly marine species are considered in this study to<br />
ensure that the occurrence of the birds truly reflects marine<br />
conditions. For birds that regularly frequent freshwater or land<br />
habitats, occurrence at a site might indicate that suitable freshwater<br />
or terrestrial, rather than marine, habitat existed in the vicinity.<br />
The species used herein are all Procellariidae, all Hydrobatidae,<br />
Moms bassanus, Phalacrocorax aristotelis, Somateria<br />
mollissima, Catharacta skua, Larus audouinii, Rissa tridactyla,<br />
Pagophila eburnea, and all Alcidae (including Pinguinus).<br />
Nomenclature for species' binomials and English names of<br />
modern birds follows Sibley and Monroe (1990). With two exceptions,<br />
these species are never found inland except as rare<br />
vagrants. The exceptions are Somateria mollissima and Rissa<br />
tridactyla, which regularly fly over land on migration but rarely<br />
stop at inland sites. Xema sabini also might have been included,<br />
but it has not yet been recorded from the Pleistocene.<br />
Larus hyperboreus has not been included because it can probably<br />
not be reliably separated from Larus marinus on osteological<br />
criteria. Puffinus puffinus and P. yelkouan have been treated<br />
as one species because they were not considered separate species<br />
at the time when most of the determinations were made.<br />
Only late Pleistocene sites where at least two marine species<br />
were reported are included in this study. Data on relevant avifaunas<br />
and their dates were obtained through an extensive<br />
Site<br />
Cyprus<br />
Akrotiri Aetokremnos<br />
Italy<br />
Archi<br />
Arene Candide<br />
Buca del Bersaglieri<br />
Cala Genovesi a Levanzo<br />
Grotta dei Fanciulli<br />
Grotta Pietro Tampoia<br />
Grotta Romanelli<br />
Norway<br />
Blomvag<br />
Skjonghelleren<br />
Portugal<br />
Grotte de Fuminha<br />
Gruta de Figueira Brava<br />
Spain<br />
Cova den Jaume Orat<br />
Cova Nova<br />
Cueva de Nerja<br />
Devil's Tower<br />
Es Pouas<br />
Gorham's Cave<br />
Great Britain<br />
Bacon Hole<br />
Creag nan Uamh<br />
Paviland Cave<br />
Potter's Cave<br />
TABLE 1.—Sites with late Pleistocene seabird faunas.<br />
Mourer-Chauvire, in litt., 1996<br />
search of the literature. This yielded a total of 22 sites and 31<br />
faunas that fulfill these criteria (Tables 1, 2). At stratified sites,<br />
each layer has been considered as a separate fauna. Only late<br />
Pleistocene records have been considered, both because dating<br />
of older records is usually quite uncertain and because the ecology<br />
of the birds may have changed over a longer time interval.<br />
For modern distributions, the maps in Cramp (1977, 1983,<br />
1985) were used. These are admittedly only approximate in<br />
offshore areas, but because the fossil record necessarily samples<br />
the coastal fauna, the nearshore distribution, which is better<br />
known, is more significant. It should be noted that the ranges<br />
used are the total ranges of the species in question, breeding<br />
ranges usually being considerably more restricted. It is, however,<br />
only rarely possible to determine whether a fossil is from a<br />
breeding bird or not. It should be noted that the ranges in<br />
Cramp only define the main area of distribution and that most<br />
species are found more or less regularly in small numbers well<br />
outside the indicated range. This, of course, introduces a margin<br />
of error, but the probability of a rare or vagrant species being<br />
preserved as a fossil is certainly very low. For the recently<br />
extinct Pinguinus impennis, a "modern" distribution map was<br />
compiled from literary and subfossil data (Figure 1).<br />
Faunas<br />
The faunas (Table 1) are treated in approximately chronological<br />
order below.<br />
Sources<br />
Ascenzi and Segre, 1971a, 1971b; Cassoli and Segre, 1985<br />
Cassoli, 1980<br />
Lambrecht, 1933; Wolf 1938<br />
Cassoli and Tagliacozzo, 1982<br />
Del Campana, 1946<br />
Lambrecht, 1933; Mayaud and Schaub, 1950; Newton, 1922; Wolf, 1938<br />
Cassoli et al., 1979<br />
Lie, 1986; Undas, 1942<br />
Larsen, 1984; Larsen et al., 1987<br />
Lambrecht, 1933; Roche, 1972; Villalta, 1964<br />
Mourer-Chauvire and Antunes, 1991; Mourer Chauvire, in litt., 1995<br />
McMinn etal., 1993<br />
Florit and Alcover, 1987; McMinn and Alcover, 1992<br />
Boessneck and von den Driesch, 1980; Eastham, 1986, 1988, 1989; Hernandez, 1993, 1994, 1995, and in litt.<br />
Garrodetal., 1928; Villalta, 1964<br />
Alcover et al., 1981, 1992; Florit etal., 1989<br />
Eastham, 1968, 1989; Vega Toscano, 1990 (dating only)<br />
Harrison, 1977, 1987; Stringer et al., 1986<br />
Newton, 1917; Lambrecht, 1933; Wolf, 1938; Stuart, 1983 (dating only)<br />
Bell, 1922; Bowen, 1970 (dating only)<br />
David, 1991