PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NUMBER 89<br />
the Chatham Island Pied Oystercatcher {Haematopus chathamensis),<br />
also might have become extinct.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Analysis of the abundant and well-dated fossil avian material<br />
found in sand-dune and cave deposits on several of the<br />
larger islands of the Chatham group indicates that these islands<br />
have supported a diverse, highly endemic avifauna since<br />
at least 7000 years ago. This avifauna, some 100 species in<br />
all, including many endemic land and freshwater birds, as<br />
well as a wide variety of seabirds, survived apparently unscathed<br />
until shortly after the first human arrival about 450<br />
years ago.<br />
Many birds of the Chatham Islands exemplify the evolutionary<br />
trend toward larger body size and diminished flying ability<br />
so typically found in small, isolated oceanic-island groups that,<br />
This appendix provides an annotated listing of both conventional<br />
and calibrated radiocarbon ages for samples from<br />
Chatham and Pitt islands. Samples (bone collagen or marineshell<br />
carbonate) are identified by their Rafter Radiocarbon<br />
Laboratory reference numbers (prefixed by NZA). Age data are<br />
presented as follows: conventional age based on the old (Libby)<br />
half-life of 5568 yrs (as "age ± standard deviation yrs BP");<br />
calibrated (corrected) age, given as median age ("CAL BP")<br />
where possible; and calibrated (corrected) age as a range expressed<br />
in terms of the 95% confidence interval (age ± two<br />
standard deviations). <strong>Lo</strong>cality names and grid references (GR)<br />
given for sampled sites (see Figure 1, numbered sites 1-21) are<br />
from New Zealand Topographical Map, NZMS 260, 1:50000<br />
metric series, Chatham Islands, edition 1, 1981 (Chatham Island<br />
(localities 1-17), sheet 1; Pitt Island (localities 18-21),<br />
sheet 2 ). (a.s.l.=above sea level.)<br />
CHATHAM ISLAND<br />
<strong>Lo</strong>cality 1, Waihora, Point Durham<br />
NZA 3193: Gallirallus dieffenbachii, Sutton coll. WH/VII/2<br />
Layer 1; GR 358470; Waihora Mound site, supposedly midden<br />
material; 5030 ± 68 yrs BP; ca. 5750 CAL BP;<br />
5894-5605 CAL BP.<br />
NZA 3194: Gallirallus dieffenbachii, Sutton coll. WH/VII/<br />
23 Layer 3; GR 358470; Waihora Mound site, supposedly<br />
midden material; 5237 ± 72 yrs BP; ca. 5950 CAL BP;<br />
6173-5753 CAL BP.<br />
Appendix<br />
103<br />
prior to human colonization, lacked mammalian predators.<br />
Most of the Chatham Islands land birds and waterfowl are larger<br />
than their mainland counterparts, and of the 36 prehistorically<br />
known species, at least seven were flightless and three more<br />
would have been weak fliers.<br />
The land birds of the Chatham Islands were clearly no exception<br />
to the general rule that insular species tend to be "naive"<br />
toward humans and introduced predators (Milberg and<br />
Tyrberg, 1993:229). The lethal combination of weak flight and<br />
trusting attitude predisposed them to an extraordinary vulnerability<br />
to human interference. The fossil record of the last 7000<br />
years gives no indication that any of the prehistorically known<br />
species became extinct, or even less abundant, prior to human<br />
arrival. All of the flightless and weak-flying species, and a further<br />
11 flying species, however, became extinct within a few<br />
hundred years of first human settlement through the combined<br />
effects of human perturbations.<br />
<strong>Lo</strong>cality 2, Red Bluff<br />
NZA 2610: Hemiphaga chathamica, MNZ S31065; GR<br />
469603; back-beach sequence in embayment, -800 m SSE<br />
of Te Whenuhau Trig, from uppermost stratum of coarse,<br />
yellow, shell sand (beneath windblown fine sand). Indicates<br />
minimum age for >2 m thick sequence; 985 ± 80 yrs BP;<br />
843 CAL BP; 975-689 CAL BP.<br />
<strong>Lo</strong>cality 3, <strong>Lo</strong>ng Beach, S of Henga<br />
limestone bluffs (GR 450655)<br />
NZA 1930: Fulica chathamensis, MNZ S27821; GR 465626;<br />
<strong>Lo</strong>ng Beach, in typical, stratified, consolidated, dune hummock<br />
(-4 m a.s.l.), immediately beneath eroded surface of<br />
brown sand/soil horizon (30 cm thick), now overlain by<br />
drift sand; 2560 ± 145 yrs BP; 2254 CAL BP; 2666-1924<br />
CAL BP.<br />
NZA 1931: Hemiphaga chathamensis, MNZ S27822; GR<br />
465626; <strong>Lo</strong>ng Beach, in pale brown sand at 1.5 m depth (directly<br />
underlying sample NZA 1930); 3790 ± 150 yrs BP;<br />
4109 CAL BP; 4511-3697 CAL BP.<br />
NZA 1929: Diaphorapteryx hawkinsi, MNZ S27820; GR<br />
456646; <strong>Lo</strong>ng Beach, Milton's Gully site, embedded in gray<br />
brown, hard-pan deflation surface (former interdune lake<br />
deposit?); 6660 ± 150 yrs BP; 7456 CAL BP; 7693-7207<br />
CAL BP.<br />
NZA 3246: Hemiphaga chathamensis, MNZ S33158; GR<br />
456646; <strong>Lo</strong>ng Beach, Milton's Gully site, in horizontally<br />
bedded brown sand at inland margin of and stratigraphically