03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NUMBER 89<br />

population, if such existed, must have been eliminated in prehistoric<br />

times.<br />

Gallirallus minor (extinct Weka): Several authors have reported<br />

bones of this species. Olson (1975:76) remarked that the<br />

presence of this species in the Chathams would be "a highly<br />

unlikely occurence" and indicated that at least the bones mentioned<br />

by Falla (1960) are well within the size range for G. dieffenbachii.<br />

Gallirallus minor is a species that has never been<br />

satisfactorily defined and may eventually prove to be no more<br />

than a smaller variant of G. australis.<br />

Strigops habroptilus (Kakapo): Travers (1873) mentioned<br />

that kakapos (as well as kiwis and wekas, see above) were<br />

known to the Maori on the Chathams, and the record was followed<br />

by several subsequent authors. Although this statement<br />

was later disavowed, Forbes (1892c, 1893a) continued to accept<br />

the unsubstantiated myth. Dawson (1959), in a detailed<br />

analysis, concluded that the only material evidence for the<br />

former presence of Strigops rested with a single bone in the<br />

Travers collection, which perhaps had not come from the<br />

Chathams at all. Subsequently, Dawson (1960) discovered two<br />

further bones of Strigops, among uncataloged material in the<br />

British Museum, that had allegedly been collected by or for<br />

Forbes in the 1890s. Because these three bones are the only<br />

ones ever identified among the many thousands of bones obtained<br />

from the Chathams, it seems most likely that their locality,<br />

too, was incorrectly recorded, although there remains a<br />

possibility (in my view, highly implausible) that Kakapo were<br />

at some time taken to the islands from New Zealand by the<br />

Maori.<br />

Nestor notabilis (Kea): The occurrence of fossil bones<br />

identified as those of the Kea was mentioned in several papers<br />

by Forbes (1892c, 1893a). Oliver (1955:542) obviously followed<br />

Forbes when remarking that "in pre-European times [the<br />

kea was present] on the Chatham Islands." Dawson (1959),<br />

however, considered all the Chatham Island bones of Nestor<br />

obtained by Forbes to belong to N. meridionalis (Kaka). My<br />

own research has shown that the Chatham Islands Nestor (Figure<br />

10) is a new, undescribed species, poorly volant and now<br />

extinct, but it is structurally more like N. meridionalis than like<br />

N. notabilis.<br />

Sceloglaux albifacies (Laughing Owl): Forbes (1892c) noted<br />

that among his Chatham Island material were bones that he<br />

identified as those of the Laughing Owl. Neither Dawson (in<br />

1958) nor I (in 1984), however, recognized any bones attribut-<br />

FlGURE 10.—Pelves of Nestor spp. (dorsal views). Left to right: Nestor notabilis (MNZ 23161); Nestor, species<br />

undescribed (NMZ S29990, PRM sample #152/91), from Te One, Chatham Island; Nestor m. meridionalis<br />

(NMZ 22504). (Scale bar=30 mm.)<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!