03.04.2013 Views

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY<br />

FIGURE 9.—<strong>Lo</strong>wer mandibles of Eudyptes spp. (left lateral views). Top to bottom: Eudyptes pachyrhynchus<br />

(MNZ 24546); Eudyptes, species undescribed (MNZ S30440, PRM sample # 15/92), from Kaingaroa, Chatham<br />

Island; Eudyptes sclateri (MNZ 18897). Total length of MNZ S30440 is 119.1 mm.<br />

THE COMPOSITION OF THE CHATHAMS AVIFAUNA<br />

It is not possible to produce an entirely accurate catalog of<br />

the living and extinct birds of the Chathams because in many<br />

cases doubts have been raised (and may always exist) over reported<br />

occurrences of several taxa. The exact composition of<br />

the terrestrial and freshwater bird fauna is particularly difficult<br />

to ascertain. Several of the 45 recorded species appear to<br />

have been included by various authors as a result of errors of<br />

identification or locality (see van Bemmelen, 1993:32),<br />

whereas others, regarded by some as members of the indigenous<br />

Chathams fauna, seem more likely to have been introduced<br />

by humans.<br />

Taxa that I exclude from the analysis of living and extinct<br />

fauna are considered below.<br />

Apteryx sp. (kiwi): Travers (1866:358) stated that "formerly<br />

an apterix [sic], said by the Maoris to have been identical<br />

with a New Zealand species, and... a smaller species of the<br />

same bird...were found [in the Chathams], but have become<br />

extinct...." Hutton (1904), as had Wallace (1893), accepted<br />

this statement and included Apteryx in his catalog. Travers<br />

(1873:213), however, commented that his son "has now reason<br />

for believing that the weka..., the kakapo..., and the kiwi...<br />

were erroneously assigned to [it]" and later (Travers,<br />

1883:183) that he himself was "not disposed to accept [these<br />

records]." No fossil bones of Apteryx have been found in the<br />

Chathams, and the record must remain unsubstantiated.<br />

Gallirallus australis (Weka): Bones, reportedly identical<br />

to those of this species, have been recovered from several sites<br />

on Chatham Island, leading to the possibility that wekas were<br />

indigenous in the Chathams prior to the introduction of G. australis<br />

hectori in 1905 (Turbott, 1990). There is no unequivocal<br />

evidence that any of these bones predate the European introduction.<br />

A mounted specimen of a Weka in the Rijksmuseum<br />

van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden (Temminck collection, accessioned<br />

in 1823), is said to be from the Chatham Islands, but this<br />

locality information may be spurious (van Bemmelen, 1993).<br />

On biogeographic grounds it seems highly unlikely that a population<br />

of Gallirallus australis, identical to the mainland form,<br />

would have evolved independently on the Chathams. If association<br />

with pre-European middens could be demonstrated, the<br />

most likely explanation would be that the species was taken to<br />

the Chathams from mainland New Zealand by the original Moriori<br />

inhabitants. Because there are no reports of Europeans<br />

having seen the species prior to 1905, it would seem that the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!