You can read this book here in pdf - Electric Scotland

264 SCOTTISH ANNALS
H75
OBITUARY OF THE CHURCH OF DURHAM. IN LIBER VITJE
EGOLESS DUNELMENSIS, 135. 1
In the year from the Lord's incarnation 1175, in which king
Henry the elder received allegiance and fealty from the Scots
at York, Dugal, son of Somerled, and Stephen his chaplain,
and Adam de Stanford received the brotherhood of our church
2
at the feet of St. Cuthbert on the vigil of St. Bartholomew ;
and the same Dugal offered there two golden rings to St. Cuthbert,
and promised that every year, so long as he lived, he
would give one mark to the convent, either in money or in its
equivalent.
1176
BENEDICT OF PETERBOROUGH, GESTA HENRICI II, VOL. I,
p. 111. 3
And to the aforesaid council, 4 which was held at North-
ampton, came William, king of Scotland, by mandate of the
lord king and ; brought with him Richard, bishop of St. Andrews,
and Joscelin, bishop of Glasgow, and Richard, bishop of
Dunkeld, and Christian, bishop of Galloway, and Andrew,
bishop of Caithness, and Simon de Thouni, bishop of Moray,
and the abbots and priors of his land, to make subjection to the
church of England.
Then the lord king demanded of them that, by the faith
which they owed him, and by the oath which they had sworn
to him, they should make to the church of England the same
subjection as they ought to make, and used to make in the time
of the kings of England his predecessors.
And they replied to him that their predecessors never made
any subjection to the church of England, and that neither ought
they to make any to her.
To this replied Roger, archbishop of York, that the bishops
of Scotland had made subjection to the metropolitan church of
York, in the time of their predecessors and ; expressly the
bishop of Glasgow, and certain other bishops of Scotland 5 and
;
1 In a 12th-century hand. Stevenson. 2 23rd August.
3 Cf. Hoved., ii, 91-92.
4 25th January, 1176.
5 " and expressly . . . Scotland," erased in MS. B.
"
Cf. Hoved., ii, 92 : But to this replied Roger, archbishop of York,
asserting that the bishops of Glasgow and the bishops of Whithorn had been
subject to the church of York in the time of the archbishop's predecessors.
And in support of this he showed documents of privilege satisfactorily drawn
up."