Figure 334. Map of Vernon Field, Jackson Parish with sampled wells highlighted in red. 399
Table 7. Wells used to construct the north-south stratigraphic cross section. Operator Well Field Sec Twp Rge Parish TD(Ft) 1) Pan Am Venzina 2) Chevron Oil 3) Arkla Expor (Mobil) 4) Anadarko Petr. 5) Cabot Oil & Gas Eliza Lewis Dunn wc (Bernice) 22 21N 03W Union Hico- Knowles 31 20N 03W Lincoln Tomlinson #1 Clay 10 17N 03W Lincoln Fisher 16 #2ALT Vernon 16 16N 02W Jackson Knight et al 1 #1 6b) Exxon Pardee #1 Clear Branch East 1 14N 02W Jackson Sikes 36 13N 01W Winn 7) Amoco Prod C Z.5-7 Wildcat 5 11N 01W Winn Table 8. Wells used to construct the west-east stratigraphic cross section Operator Well Field Sec Twp Rge Parish 1) JW Operating Cupples 18-12 ALT Elm Grove 3 16N 13W Caddo 2) Tenneco Oil Baker #1 Lake Bistineau 12 16N 10W Bienville 3) Franks & Bear Broyles Bardin #1 Creek 8 16N 06W Bienville 4) J-W Operating Davis Brothers 21-1 Davis Driscoll 21 16N 04W Bienville 5) Amoco Prod Bros 8-3 #1 Vernon 8 16N 03W Jackson 6a) Anadarko Fisher 16 Petr. #1ALT Vernon 16 16N 02W Jackson 7) Cabot Oil & Gas 8) Burlington Res. Weyerh Co. 15-1 Vernon 15 16N 01W Jackson Donner 13-1 Cheniere Creek 13 16N 02E Ouachita 400 11,031 12,197 12,457 14,055 15,918 19,500 17,992 TD(Ft) 10,612 11,123 12,550 16,900 13,250 14,100 13,778 13,992 Top Bossier (Ft.) 9,270 9,925 Base Bossier (Ft.) 9,930 10,495 11,780 na 11,980 12,785 15,775 13,000 14,890 17,310 15,600 na Top Bossier (Ft.) 9,578 8,495 11,770 12,120 11,970 12,000 11,895 11,090 Base Bossier (Ft.) 10,160 9,120 12,365 12,930 12,725 13,013 12,930 12,150
- Page 1 and 2:
time frame spanning from approximat
- Page 3 and 4: the same well, Pennsylvanian plant
- Page 5 and 6: Louann Salt The Louann Salt conform
- Page 7 and 8: Norphlet deposition, in southern Ar
- Page 9 and 10: Haynesville-Buckner Formation Produ
- Page 11 and 12: Caddo, Bossier, Webster, Claiborne,
- Page 13 and 14: Smackover limestone. The Bossier gr
- Page 15 and 16: Lower Cretaceous Coahuila (Hosston,
- Page 17 and 18: system that includes a variety of d
- Page 19 and 20: greater than 90 md, most of the Tra
- Page 21 and 22: contains approximately 13 producing
- Page 23 and 24: Pine Island shale, averaging 250 ft
- Page 25 and 26: 10%. Calcite-lined vugs and intergr
- Page 27 and 28: Lake Anhydrite was deposited above
- Page 29 and 30: Sabine, Franklin, Tensas Shallow wa
- Page 31 and 32: Across northern Louisiana in the pr
- Page 33 and 34: Taylor Group Producing Parishes Cad
- Page 35 and 36: 2,000 to 2,500 ft with net pay of 1
- Page 37 and 38: productive in east-central Louisian
- Page 39 and 40: North Louisiana Salt Basin. The str
- Page 41 and 42: Louisiana Salt Basin. Lower Cretace
- Page 43 and 44: Table 2. Oil and gas production for
- Page 45 and 46: 1987; Claypool and Mancini, 1989; M
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 329. Cross section A-A’. G
- Page 49 and 50: generation (Table 4). The following
- Page 51 and 52: Table 5. Cotton Valley-Bossier Grou
- Page 53: Table 6. Cotton Valley-Group sample
- Page 57 and 58: Figure 336. Electric logs for wells
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 338. Thin section micrograph
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 340. Amoco CZ 5-7 well elect
- Page 63 and 64: Table 9. Total organic carbon, rock
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 343. HI versus OI diagram. T
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 345. Rock-Eval pyrolysis ana
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 347. Visual kerogen analyses
- Page 71 and 72: gas with some oil, not only within
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 350. Burial history profile
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 352. Hydrocarbon expulsion p
- Page 77 and 78: Figure 354. (A) Thermal-maturity an
- Page 79 and 80: Figure 356. Cross section A-A’ sh
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 360. Cross section J-J’ sh
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 364. Seismic cross section B
- Page 85 and 86: of secondary, non-associated thermo
- Page 87 and 88: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Geologic His
- Page 89 and 90: peripheral fault trend and numerous
- Page 91 and 92: oundary between thick transitional
- Page 93 and 94: Cretaceous reservoirs have shown th
- Page 95 and 96: from the southern part of the basin
- Page 97 and 98: Reservoir Assessment Comparison of
- Page 99 and 100: For example, Upper Cretaceous sands
- Page 101 and 102: The Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretace
- Page 103 and 104: Bishop, W.F., 1968, Petrology of up
- Page 105 and 106:
Dawson, W.C., and Callender, C.A.,
- Page 107 and 108:
Fisher, W.L., and McGowen, J.H., 19
- Page 109 and 110:
Hermann, L.A., J.A. Lott, and R.E.
- Page 111 and 112:
Mancini, E.A., M. Badali, T.M. Puck
- Page 113 and 114:
McCulloh, R.P., and Eversull, L.G.,
- Page 115 and 116:
Source Rock Potential of Carbonate
- Page 117 and 118:
Salvador, A., 1991b, Triassic-Juras
- Page 119 and 120:
Tolson, J.S., C.W. Copeland, and B.
- Page 121:
Zimmerman, R.K., 1999a, A potential
Change language