Part 4 - Berg - Hughes Center

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dutton, S.P, and Finley, R.J., 1988, Controls on reservoir quality in tight sandstones of the Travis Peak Formation, east Texas SPE Paper #15220. Dutton, S.P., Laubach, S.E., Tye, R.S., Baumgardner, R.W., and Harrington, K.L., 1990, Geology of the Lower Cretaceous Travis Peak Formation, East Texas-depositional history, diagenesis, structure, and reservoir engineering implications: Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas/GRI Topical Report 90/0090, 170 p. Eaves, E., 1976, Citronelle oil field, Mobile County, Alabama: AAPG Memoir 24, p. 259-275. Echols, D.J., and Malkin, D., 1948, Wilcox (Eocene) stratigraphy, a key to production: AAPG Bulletin, v. 32, p. 11-33. Echols, J.B., 1991, Sea level high stand shales and thin-stacked deltas, Paleocene Middle Wilcox of central Louisiana and Mississippi: GCAGS Trans., v. 41, p. 221-236. Echols, J.B., and Goddard, D.A., 1992, Sea level fluctuations, Paleocene Middle Wilcox stratigraphy and hydrocarbon distribution in east-central Louisiana: GCAGS Trans., v. 42, p. 333-340. Echols, J.B., and Goddard, D.A., 1993, Lower Wilcox reservoir characteristics: evidence for bypassed and subjacent hydrocarbon potential, east central Louisiana (abs): AAPG Bulletin, v. 77, no. 13, p. 96. Evans, R., 1987, Pathways of migration of oil and gas in the south Mississippi Salt Basin: GCAGS Trans., v. 37, p. 75-76. Eversull, L.G., 1985, Depositional systems and distribution of Cotton Valley blanket sandstones in northern Louisiana: GCAGS Trans., v. 35, p. 49-57. 451
Fisher, W.L., and McGowen, J.H., 1967, Depositional systems in the Wilcox Group of Texas and their relationship to occurrence of oil and gas: GCAGS Trans., v. 17, p. 105-125. Forgotson, J.M., 1954, Regional stratigraphic analysis of Cotton Valley Group of Upper Gulf Coastal Plain: AAPG Bulletin, v. 38, p. 2476-2499. Forgotson, J.M., 1957, Stratigraphy of Comanchean Cretaceous Trinity Group: AAPG Bulletin, v. 41, p. 2328-2363. Forgotson, J.M., 1958, The basal sediments of the Austin Group and the stratigraphic position of the Tuscaloosa Formation of central Louisiana: GCAGS Trans., v. 8, p. 117-125. Forgotson, J.M., 1963, Depositional history and paleotectonic framework of Comanchean Cretaceous Trinity Stage, Gulf Coast Area: AAPG Bulletin, v. 47, no. 1, p. 69-103. Forgotson, J.M., Jr., and Forgotson, J.M., 1975, "Porosity pod": concept for successful stratigraphic exploration of fine-grained sandstones: AAPG Bulletin, v. 59, p. 1113-1125. Forgotson, J.M., and Forgotson, J.M., Jr., 1976, Definition of Gilmer Limestone, Upper Jurassic formation, northeast Texas: AAPG Bulletin, v. 60, p. 1119-1123. Frizzel, L.G., 1987, North Shongaloo—Red Rock Field, Hill Sand (Rodessa), Webster Parish, Louisiana: Shreveport Geological Society Report on Selected Oil and Gas Fields, ARK-LA-TEX and Mississippi, v. Vll, p. 80-84. Galloway, W.E., 1968, Depositional systems of the Lower Wilcox Group, North-Central Gulf Coast Basin: GCAGS Trans., v. 18, p. 275-289. 452
Page 1 and 2:
time frame spanning from approximat
Page 3 and 4:
the same well, Pennsylvanian plant
Page 5 and 6:
Louann Salt The Louann Salt conform
Page 7 and 8:
Norphlet deposition, in southern Ar
Page 9 and 10:
Haynesville-Buckner Formation Produ
Page 11 and 12:
Caddo, Bossier, Webster, Claiborne,
Page 13 and 14:
Smackover limestone. The Bossier gr
Page 15 and 16:
Lower Cretaceous Coahuila (Hosston,
Page 17 and 18:
system that includes a variety of d
Page 19 and 20:
greater than 90 md, most of the Tra
Page 21 and 22:
contains approximately 13 producing
Page 23 and 24:
Pine Island shale, averaging 250 ft
Page 25 and 26:
10%. Calcite-lined vugs and intergr
Page 27 and 28:
Lake Anhydrite was deposited above
Page 29 and 30:
Sabine, Franklin, Tensas Shallow wa
Page 31 and 32:
Across northern Louisiana in the pr
Page 33 and 34:
Taylor Group Producing Parishes Cad
Page 35 and 36:
2,000 to 2,500 ft with net pay of 1
Page 37 and 38:
productive in east-central Louisian
Page 39 and 40:
North Louisiana Salt Basin. The str
Page 41 and 42:
Louisiana Salt Basin. Lower Cretace
Page 43 and 44:
Table 2. Oil and gas production for
Page 45 and 46:
1987; Claypool and Mancini, 1989; M
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 329. Cross section A-A’. G
Page 49 and 50:
generation (Table 4). The following
Page 51 and 52:
Table 5. Cotton Valley-Bossier Grou
Page 53 and 54:
Table 6. Cotton Valley-Group sample
Page 55 and 56: Table 7. Wells used to construct th
Page 57 and 58: Figure 336. Electric logs for wells
Page 59 and 60: Figure 338. Thin section micrograph
Page 61 and 62: Figure 340. Amoco CZ 5-7 well elect
Page 63 and 64: Table 9. Total organic carbon, rock
Page 65 and 66: Figure 343. HI versus OI diagram. T
Page 67 and 68: Figure 345. Rock-Eval pyrolysis ana
Page 69 and 70: Figure 347. Visual kerogen analyses
Page 71 and 72: gas with some oil, not only within
Page 73 and 74: Figure 350. Burial history profile
Page 75 and 76: Figure 352. Hydrocarbon expulsion p
Page 77 and 78: Figure 354. (A) Thermal-maturity an
Page 79 and 80: Figure 356. Cross section A-A’ sh
Page 81 and 82: Figure 360. Cross section J-J’ sh
Page 83 and 84: Figure 364. Seismic cross section B
Page 85 and 86: of secondary, non-associated thermo
Page 87 and 88: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Geologic His
Page 89 and 90: peripheral fault trend and numerous
Page 91 and 92: oundary between thick transitional
Page 93 and 94: Cretaceous reservoirs have shown th
Page 95 and 96: from the southern part of the basin
Page 97 and 98: Reservoir Assessment Comparison of
Page 99 and 100: For example, Upper Cretaceous sands
Page 101 and 102: The Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretace
Page 103 and 104: Bishop, W.F., 1968, Petrology of up
Page 105: Dawson, W.C., and Callender, C.A.,
Page 109 and 110: Hermann, L.A., J.A. Lott, and R.E.
Page 111 and 112: Mancini, E.A., M. Badali, T.M. Puck
Page 113 and 114: McCulloh, R.P., and Eversull, L.G.,
Page 115 and 116: Source Rock Potential of Carbonate
Page 117 and 118: Salvador, A., 1991b, Triassic-Juras
Page 119 and 120: Tolson, J.S., C.W. Copeland, and B.
Page 121: Zimmerman, R.K., 1999a, A potential
show all

Part 4 - Berg - Hughes Center

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?