Edith W. Clowes.pdf
Edith W. Clowes.pdf
Edith W. Clowes.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
336 Slavic and East European Journal<br />
proliferation of "simulacra" of reality on computer and television screens.<br />
To cite the tinselly tennis star, Andre Agassi, in his camera commercial:<br />
"Image is everything." And so it is in Baudrillard's postmodernist world.<br />
All is surface. There is nothing to interpret (which leads us to wonder why<br />
Baudrillard is indeed interpreting). Epstein in his recent essays, "After the<br />
Future" (1991) and "Relativistic Patterns in Totalitarian Thinking" (1991),<br />
makes an interesting case for relating the ideas of "simulacrum" and<br />
"hyperreality" to Soviet culture. In "Relativistic Patterns" he sees the fol-<br />
lowing fundamental contradiction in Soviet culture:<br />
The Soviet world view is characterized by extreme materialism in theory and extreme idealism<br />
in practice. We could even say that Soviet Marxism's overstated materialism is nothing but an<br />
ideological phantom, in the postmodernist sense of the word. Such 'hypermaterialism' is a sort<br />
of simulacrum, the product of pure mentality. The self-serving raison d'etre for such countless<br />
Soviet simulacra as hyperunity, hyperlabor, hyperparty, hyperpeople, hyperpower, and<br />
hyperfuture does not differ much from that of Western media. If in the west visual simulacra<br />
bring great profit, in the Soviet Union ideological simulacra have long brought great power<br />
(Epstein, "Relativistic Patterns," 42, n.54).<br />
Thus, this extreme, though officially denied contradiction between theory<br />
and practice leads to "hypermaterialism," a simulacrum of materialist phi-<br />
losophy behind which there is no real acknowledgment of material condi-<br />
tions. Indeed, Soviet citizens subsisted for decades on ideas and ideals,<br />
since very little else was offered.<br />
It is important to note that, while Baudrillard claims that the American<br />
public is in the grip of hyperreality, these Soviet-era simulacra have long<br />
since lost their power to convince even the simplest worker. Soviets' sur-<br />
vival skepticism is borne out in the widely held view that "if you pretend to<br />
pay us, we will pretend to work." Similarly, the old joke s borodoi about<br />
the "eye-ear" doctor tells us the same thing: the woman comes to the clinic<br />
and says she wants to see the eye-ear doctor. She is told that the clinic has<br />
eye doctors or ear-nose-and-throat doctors but not what she wants. The<br />
nurse asks what her symptoms are. When she answers, "Well, I see one<br />
thing and hear another," the nurse replies, "We can't cure you of Soviet<br />
ideology." These anecdotes do point to a difference between Baudrillard's<br />
conceptualization of postmodern culture, based largely on his observation<br />
of the American "utopia," and the Soviet situation. Baudrillard argues that<br />
the postmodern condition persists because consumers are seduced by the<br />
surface, by image. This is not at all the case in Russia where not only<br />
intellectuals but others, as well, have known for a long time that they were<br />
being lied to, cheated, and coerced by brute force.<br />
In "After the Future," Epstein poses the question of the relation be-<br />
tween "post-future" Russian culture of the late 1980s and Western postmod-<br />
ernism. Here again he finds in the sphere of politics, ideology, political<br />
advertising, and propaganda another simulacrum. This is the figure of