03.04.2013 Views

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOREWORD<br />

A report issued by an international study group <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmutation <strong>of</strong> nuclear waste using accelerator<br />

driven systems has highlighted <strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong> specific sets <strong>of</strong> nuclear data. These authoritative requirements<br />

include fission product yields at an intermediate incident neutron energy <strong>of</strong> up to 150 MeV.<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present CRP on fission product yield data <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmutation <strong>of</strong> nuclear waste,<br />

only four types <strong>of</strong> evaluated fission yield data sets existed, namely <strong>for</strong> spontaneous fission, and <strong>for</strong> fission<br />

induced by <strong>the</strong>rmal, fast (or fission) spectrum, and by ‘high energy’ (14–15 MeV) neutrons. A new type <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluation <strong>for</strong> energy dependent neutron induced fission yields was required <strong>for</strong> this project. In view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

scarcity <strong>of</strong> experimental data, such an evaluation has to be based on systematics and <strong>the</strong>oretical model calculations.<br />

Unlike fission cross-sections, where nuclear models are being used successfully <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong><br />

unmeasured cross-section ranges, such models or <strong>the</strong>ories existed only <strong>for</strong> low energy fission yields. Hence <strong>the</strong><br />

CRP participants entered a completely new field <strong>of</strong> research <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong> progress and outcome were unpredictable.<br />

Clearly <strong>the</strong> ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> such an ef<strong>for</strong>t, namely an evaluation <strong>of</strong> energy dependent fission yields,<br />

could not be realized within <strong>the</strong> perceived lifetime <strong>of</strong> a CRP.<br />

The main emphasis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CRP was on <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> adequate systematics and models <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> energy dependent fission yields up to 150 MeV incident neutron energy. Several problems had to<br />

be solved, such as <strong>the</strong> correct choice <strong>of</strong> model parameters and multiplicity distributions <strong>of</strong> emitted neutrons, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> multi-chance fission. Models and systematics have been tested <strong>for</strong> lower energy yields, but <strong>the</strong>y<br />

failed to reproduce recent experimental data, particularly at higher energies, and <strong>the</strong> parameters had to be<br />

modified. O<strong>the</strong>r models have been developed from <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> experimental data in order to derive<br />

systematic dependences and <strong>the</strong>y were adapted in <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CRP to predict fission product yields. The<br />

valuable role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CRP in such work became evident during <strong>the</strong> meetings, at which <strong>the</strong> discussions <strong>for</strong>med a<br />

fruitful basis <strong>for</strong> improvements to <strong>the</strong> models. The benchmark exercise revealed <strong>the</strong> true worth and predictive<br />

capabilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> systematics and <strong>the</strong>oretical models developed during <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CRP. Necessary<br />

improvements and <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> future studies were also revealed. These models have <strong>the</strong> potential to give<br />

reliable predictions after implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> improvements suggested in this report.<br />

A brief introduction and <strong>the</strong> various studies undertaken by individual participants are given at <strong>the</strong><br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> this publication, followed by a detailed description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resulting overall achievements,<br />

conclusions and recommendations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CRP and a summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> benchmark exercise and results. Additional<br />

material is included on <strong>the</strong> enclosed CD-ROM, including compilations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fission product yields, unedited<br />

papers and all details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> benchmark exercise.<br />

The IAEA wishes to thank all CRP participants <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir contributions to <strong>the</strong> project. The IAEA<br />

responsible <strong>of</strong>ficers were M. Lammer and A.L. Nichols <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Division <strong>of</strong> Physical and Chemical Sciences.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!