03.04.2013 Views

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

all product nuclides. The data tables were processed to<br />

generate <strong>the</strong> data in <strong>the</strong> required <strong>for</strong>mat.<br />

I.3.2.12. Laurec et al. [I.14]<br />

Measurement type 2: The cumulative yields<br />

from 233,235,238 U and 239 Pu fission induced by fission<br />

spectrum and 14.7 MeV neutrons were measured by<br />

<strong>the</strong> radiochemical method. The g ray spectra were<br />

measured with a Ge(Li) detector and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

fissions was determined with a plane ionization<br />

chamber.<br />

The data <strong>for</strong> 239 Pu fission at 14.9 MeV were<br />

used. Although <strong>the</strong> measured yields are cumulative,<br />

<strong>the</strong> differences between <strong>the</strong>se values and <strong>the</strong> chain<br />

yields are all within <strong>the</strong> experimental uncertainties.<br />

So all data were used except <strong>for</strong> 136 Xe, whose yield is<br />

small and possibly incorrect.<br />

I.3.2.13. Winkelmann et al. [I.15]<br />

Measurement type 2: The cumulative yields<br />

from 242 Pu fission induced by 15.1 MeV neutrons<br />

were measured <strong>for</strong> 65 fission products from 85 Kr to<br />

151 Pm. The fission product activities were measured<br />

by direct g ray spectrometry with a Ge(Li) detector,<br />

as well as chemical separation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fission product<br />

elements Pd, Ag, Cd, Sn, Sb and Ce, followed by<br />

b counting or g ray spectrometry. The chain yields<br />

<strong>of</strong> 43 mass chains were obtained by dividing <strong>the</strong><br />

measured cumulative yields by an adjustment<br />

factor, which is <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cumulative yield <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> measured product nuclide to <strong>the</strong> corresponding<br />

chain yield.<br />

The data were used after <strong>the</strong> following<br />

procedures had been applied:<br />

(a) Some chain yields were obtained from two or<br />

more cumulative yields — <strong>the</strong> recommended<br />

chain yield was taken as <strong>the</strong>ir weighted<br />

average.<br />

(b) Two fission yields were not used: that <strong>of</strong> 126g Sb<br />

because <strong>the</strong> value is an independent yield, and<br />

that <strong>of</strong> 111m Pm because <strong>the</strong> datum is only a<br />

partial isomeric yield.<br />

(c) The data <strong>of</strong> product nuclides 130g Sb, 131 Sb and<br />

131m Te were also discarded. The chain yields<br />

deduced from <strong>the</strong> cumulative yields <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

nuclides are too small. The fractions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

measured cumulative yields to <strong>the</strong> corresponding<br />

chain yields are too small, which<br />

could introduce large uncertainties into <strong>the</strong><br />

resulting chain yields. In addition, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

large differences <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> adjustment factors <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se nuclides between <strong>the</strong> values given in <strong>the</strong><br />

paper and those calculated with <strong>the</strong> data from<br />

ENDF/B-VI.<br />

I.4. RESULTS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> data selected from <strong>the</strong><br />

available experimental data, and after <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

evaluation and processing as described above, <strong>the</strong><br />

recommended mass distribution data <strong>for</strong> 238 U,<br />

239,242 Pu fission are listed in Table I.1. All<br />

recommended data are given in <strong>the</strong> annex to this<br />

section, and plotted in Figs I.1–I.16.<br />

As mentioned above, <strong>the</strong>re are two types <strong>of</strong><br />

measurements <strong>for</strong> mass distributions:<br />

(a) <strong>Data</strong> are obtained by recording prompt fission<br />

fragments (data type 1 in Table I.1) with a<br />

double Frisch gridded ionization chamber,<br />

silicon PIN diode detector arrays, etc., as<br />

described by Vivès et al., Zöller and Äystö<br />

et al.<br />

(b) <strong>Data</strong> are obtained by recording <strong>the</strong> radioactivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> fission product nuclides (data type 2<br />

in Table I.1) by means <strong>of</strong> g ray spectrometry<br />

with a Ge(Li) or HPGe detector, ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

directly from <strong>the</strong> fission sample or after radiochemical<br />

separation, as undertaken by Nagy et<br />

al., Chapman, Li Ze et al., Liu Conggui et al.,<br />

Daroczy et al., Liu Yonghui et al., Gindler et<br />

al., Ford, Laurec et al. and Winkelmann et al.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> comparisons in Figs I.17–I.19, <strong>the</strong> data<br />

measured by different laboratories but obtained with<br />

<strong>the</strong> same type <strong>of</strong> method (data type 1 or 2) are<br />

generally found to be in good agreement within <strong>the</strong><br />

experimental uncertainty. But <strong>the</strong>re is a systematic<br />

difference between <strong>the</strong> two types <strong>of</strong> data. The reason<br />

lies (a) in <strong>the</strong> physical nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> measured yield<br />

and (b) in differences in <strong>the</strong> measurement techniques.<br />

The essential difference between <strong>the</strong> two types <strong>of</strong><br />

method is that <strong>for</strong> type 2 <strong>the</strong>re is some delay time<br />

(days, hours seconds, etc.) between fragment<br />

<strong>for</strong>mation and measurement, during which <strong>the</strong><br />

radioactive products decay (although this effect can<br />

be accounted <strong>for</strong>), whereas <strong>for</strong> data type 1 <strong>the</strong><br />

measurement is ‘prompt’. Never<strong>the</strong>less, even in <strong>the</strong><br />

type 1 method <strong>the</strong> fragments are generally measured<br />

283

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!