03.04.2013 Views

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FIG. 4.6.22. Post-neutron emission mass yields in neutron<br />

induced fission reactions as specified in <strong>the</strong> graphs. <strong>Data</strong><br />

taken from Refs [4.6.53–4.6.56]. The triangles in <strong>the</strong> upper<br />

graph correspond to data taken from a table, whereas <strong>the</strong><br />

circles were read from a figure.<br />

resulting mass yields are entirely symmetric or<br />

possess at least a large symmetric share. A solid line<br />

connects <strong>the</strong> isotopes <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong> symmetric<br />

hump exceeds <strong>the</strong> asymmetric humps <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> first<br />

time in going towards neutron poor nuclides<br />

starting from stability. This is taken as a crude<br />

measure <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> transition. The dot–dashed line<br />

represents a condition defined by Chung and Hogan<br />

[4.6.27, 4.6.28], which also marks <strong>the</strong> transition from<br />

symmetric to asymmetric (mixed) fissioning<br />

isotopes. The dashed line corresponds to a<br />

calculation by Möller [4.6.57], who determined <strong>the</strong><br />

stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> saddle point configuration against<br />

asymmetric de<strong>for</strong>mations. Both lines belonging to<br />

Chung–Hogan and Möller run more or less parallel<br />

to <strong>the</strong> line <strong>of</strong> stability. However, <strong>the</strong> line originating<br />

from <strong>the</strong> ALICE-91 plus temperature dependent<br />

Brosa model calculations is perpendicular to <strong>the</strong>se<br />

lines. This completely different behaviour is also<br />

observed by Schmidt et al. [4.6.35] in <strong>the</strong> charge<br />

232<br />

FIG. 4.6.23. Mass distributions <strong>of</strong> various isotopes labelled<br />

by <strong>the</strong> element name and neutron number — calculations<br />

are per<strong>for</strong>med at a fixed excitation energy <strong>of</strong> 10 MeV. The<br />

thick solid line connects isotopes <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong> symmetric<br />

hump exceeds <strong>the</strong> asymmetric humps <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time,<br />

starting from stability and going towards neutron poor<br />

nuclides; <strong>the</strong> dotted line is obtained in an equivalent<br />

manner from charge distributions measured by Schmidt et<br />

al. [4.6.35]; <strong>the</strong> dot–dashed line represents a condition<br />

defined by Chung and Hogan [4.6.27, 4.6.28], and <strong>the</strong><br />

dashed line corresponds to a calculation by Möller<br />

[4.6.57].<br />

FIG. 4.6.24. Same as Fig. 4.6.23, but <strong>for</strong> an excitation<br />

energy <strong>of</strong> 20 MeV.<br />

distributions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same fissioning isotopes at<br />

excitation energies peaked around 11 MeV. Here<br />

<strong>the</strong> transition marked by <strong>the</strong> dotted line also tends<br />

to occur along a line perpendicular to <strong>the</strong> Möller<br />

line. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> prediction by <strong>the</strong> ALICE-91<br />

plus temperature dependent Brosa model exhibits<br />

<strong>the</strong> same tendency as experimentally observed. In<br />

conclusion, at low energies <strong>the</strong> transition seems to<br />

take place at less neutron poor nuclides <strong>for</strong> thorium<br />

and actinium than <strong>for</strong> uranium.<br />

The preportions <strong>of</strong> symmetric and asymmetric<br />

fission depend on <strong>the</strong> excitation energy. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

similar calculations are carried out <strong>for</strong> an excitation<br />

energy <strong>of</strong> 20 MeV (Fig. 4.6.24). Because <strong>the</strong> excitation<br />

energy lies well above <strong>the</strong> barriers, all fission modes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!