Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[2.1.67] RUBCHENYA, V.A., et al., “Fission product yields at intermediate energy”, Nuclear Fission and Fission-Product Spectroscopy (Proc. Conf. Seyssins, France, 1998) (FIONI, G., et al., Eds), American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY (1998) 453–461. [2.1.68] STEVENSON, P.C., et al., Further radiochemical studies of the high-energy fission products, Phys. Rev. 111 (1958) 886–891. [2.1.69] TEWES, H.A., JAMES, R.A., Proton induced reactions of thorium–fission yield curves, Phys. Rev. 88 (1952) 860–867. [2.1.70] TITARENKO, Y.E., et al., Experimental and computer simulation study of the radionuclides produced in thin 209 Bi targets by 130 MeV and 1.5 GeV proton-induced reactions, Nucl. [2.1.71] Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 414 (1998) 73– 99. TRZASKA, W.H., et al., Fragment mass distribution in superasymmetric region in protoninduced fission of U and Th, Nuovo Cimento 111A (1998) 1055–1060. [2.1.72] TSUKADA, K.Y., et al., Mass yield and angular distribution of rare earth elements produced in proton-induced fission of 244 Pu, J. Alloys Comp. 214 (1994) 414–416. [2.1.73] TSUKADA, K., et al., Highly asymmetric mass division in low-energy proton-induced fission of 232 244 Th and Pu, Radiochim. Acta 76 (1997) 173– 180. [2.1.74] WAGNER, B.J., et al., Radiochemical measurements of 200-MeV proton-induced fission of 133 Cs, Phys. Rev. C 31 (1985) 1934–1936. [2.1.75] YOKOYAMA, A., et al., Precision determination of charge dispersion and distribution in the proton-induced fission of 238 U at 13.9 MeV excitation, Z. Phys. A Hadrons Nucl. 356 (1996) 55– 60. [2.1.76] ZHAO, Y.L., et al., Characteristics of binary scission configurations in proton-induced fission of actinides, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 239 (1999) 113–116. [2.1.77] ZHDANOV, S.V., et al., Study of the shape of the energy distributions of fission fragments, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 50 (1989) 569–573. [2.1.78] ZHDANOV, S.V., et al., Higher moments of energy distributions of fragments of symmetric fission, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 55 (1992) 1766–1771. [2.1.79] ITKIS, M.G., et al., Fission of heavy and superheavy nuclei at low excitation energies, Nucl. Phys. A 654 (1999) 870c–877c. [2.1.80] AAGAARD, P., et al., Measurements on electromagnetically separated radioactive isotopes of iodine, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 5 (1957) 105–111. [2.1.81] BABA, H., et al., Changes of the characteristics of the proton-induced fission of 238 U around 14 MeV excitation, Z. Phys. A Hadrons Nucl. 356 (1996) 61–70. [2.1.82] BEELEY, P.A., et al., Isotopic and neutron yields of products from the asymmetric and near-symmetric proton-induced fission of 233 U and 235 U, Phys. Rev. C 28 (1983) 1188–1205. [2.1.83] BENJAMIN, P.P., et al., Nuclear charge dispersion in the fission of 232 Th by protons of energy 20–85 MeV, Can. J. Chem. 47 (1969) 301–312. [2.1.84] BIRGUEL, O., YAFFE, L., The fission of 197 Au by protons of energies of 52–85 MeV, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 103 (1986) 153–158. [2.1.85] CHAN, K.C., et al., Independent yields of indium and gallium in the proton induced fission of natural uranium, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 39 (1977) 1915–1919. [2.1.86] DIKSIC, M., et al., Nuclear charge dispersion in mass chains 130–135 from the fission of 238 U by medium-energy protons, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 36 (1974) 7–16. [2.1.87] DIKSIC, M., et al., Charge dispersion studies of light-mass nuclides in the fission of 232 Th by protons of energies 35–75 MeV, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 41 (1979) 795–800. [2.1.88] GALINIER, J.L., et al., Nuclear charge dispersion studies in the light-mass region formed in the fission of 238 U by protons of energy 35– 85 MeV, Can. J. Chem. 55 (1977) 3609–3615. [2.1.89] KUDO, H., et al., Most probable charge of fission products in 24 MeV proton induced fission of 238 U, Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 178–188. [2.1.90] HOLUB, R., YAFFE, L., Charge dispersion studies of heavy-mass elements in the fission of 232 Th by protons of medium energy, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 35 (1973) 3991–4000. [2.1.91] LEE, J.K.P., et al., Independent yields of Rb and Cs isotopes from the fission of natural uranium induced by protons of energy 80 and 100 MeV, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 37 (1975) 2035–2038. [2.1.92] MARSHALL, H., YAFFE, L., Nuclear charge dispersion of products in the light-mass region formed in the fission of 233 U by protons of energy 20–85 MeV, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 35 (1973) 1797–1804. [2.1.93] McGEE, T., et al., Nuclear charge dispersion in the fission of 237 Np by protons of medium energy, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 34 (1972) 3323– 3333. [2.1.94] MILLER, L.D., YAFFE, L., Charge dispersion in the fission of 238 U by protons of energies 30–160 MeV, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 35 (1973) 1805–1819. [2.1.95] NIKKINEN, L., et al., Independent yields of Rb, In, and Cs isotopes in the proton-induced fission of 232 Th, Phys. Rev. C 22 (1980) 617–626. 11
[2.1.96] PATE, B.D., et al., Distribution of nuclear charge in the proton-induced fission of 232 Th, Can. J. Chem. 36 (1958) 1691–1706. [2.1.97] REDDY, A.V.R., et al., Charge distribution on 96 MeV 16 O induced fission of 238U, Radiochim. Acta 64 (1994) 149–154. [2.1.98] SAHA, G.B., YAFFE, L., Charge dispersion studies in the fission of 239 Pu by protons of medium energy, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 32 (1970) 745–767. [2.1.99] SARKAR, S., YAFFE, L., Nuclear charge distribution in the region of symmetric fission of 238 U by protons of energy 20–85 MeV, Can. J. Chem. 54 (1976) 2349–2358. [2.1.100] SHINOHARA, N., et al., Cumulative yields of 12 short-lived Ru isotopes in the C- and 19 233 235 238 237 F-induced fission of U, U, U and Np, Radiochim. Acta 68 (1995) 21–26. [2.1.101] TRACY, B.L., et al., Rb and Cs isotopic cross sections from 40–60 MeV proton fission of 238 U, 232 235 Th, and U, Phys. Rev. C 5 (1972) 222–234. [2.1.102] YOKOYAMA, A., et al., Charge degree of freedom as a sensitive probe for fission mechanism, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 223 (1999) 99– 119. [2.1.103] FORSTER, J.H., YAFFE, L., Isomeric yield ratios of 133 Xe in fission of 232 Th, 233 U, 235 U, and 238 U with protons of energies 20–85 MeV, Can. J. Chem. 46 (1968) 1743–1772. [2.1.104] GOTO, S., et al., Isomeric yield ratios of fission products in proton-induced fission of 232 Th, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 239 (1999) 109–112. [2.1.105] KHAN, A.H., et al., Isomer ratios of 90 Y and 91 Y in the fission of 235 U and 238 U by protons of energies 20–85 MeV, Can. J. Chem. 47 (1969) 3817–3822. [2.1.106] SAHA, G.B., et al., Isomer ratios of 134 Cs formed in the fission of 233 U and 235 U by protons of energies 20–85 MeV, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 31 (1969) 3731–3737. [2.1.107] SAHA, G.B., YAFFE, L., An energy-dependent 134 calculation of the isomer ratios of Cs produced in the fission of 239 Pu by mediumenergy protons, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 31 (1969) 1891–1905. [2.1.108] SHINOHARA, N., et al., Isomeric yield ratios of 134 136 12 19 I and I in the proton-, C- and F-induced fission of 235U, 237Np and 238U, Radiochim. Acta 88 (2000) 1–5. [2.1.109] TANIKAWA, M., et al., Isomeric yield ratios of fission products in the system of 24 MeV protoninduced fusion of 238U, Z. Phys. A Hadrons Nucl. 347 (1993) 53–62. [2.1.110] FRAENKEL, Z., et al., Measurement of the neutrons emitted in the proton-induced fission of 209 Bi and 238 U at 475 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 41 (1990) 1050–1061. 12 [2.1.111] STRECKER, M., et al., Pre-scission and postscission neutrons from the reactions p+ 235,236,238 U with Ep £ 25.6 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 41 (1990) 2172– 2187. [2.1.112] IKEZOE, H., et al., “Light charged particle emission in fission”, Fifty Years with Nuclear Fission (Proc. Conf. Gaithersburg, MD, 1989) (BEHRENS, J.W., CARLSON, A.D., Eds), American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL (1989) 721–726. [2.1.113] IKEZOE, H., et al., Charged particle multiplicities in heavy-ion-induced fission, Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992) 1922–1933. [2.1.114] THOMAS, T.D., WHETSTONE, S.L., Jr., Emission of alpha particles in the fission of 238 U by 11 to 21 MeV protons, Phys. Rev. 144 (1966) 1060–1070. [2.1.115] RUBCHENYA, V.A., et al., “Fission modes in 238 U+d reaction at intermediate energy”, Fission and Neutron Rich Nuclei (Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. St. Andrews, UK, 1999) (HAMILTON, J.H., et al., Eds), World Scientific, Singapore (1999). [2.1.116] SUGIHARA, T.T., et al., Fission yields of natural uranium with deuterons of 5, 10, and 13.6 MeV: Deuteron capture and competition with stripping, Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 1264–1273. [2.1.117] TRZASKA, W.H., et al., “Deuteron induced fission of 238 U”, Fission, Pont d’Oye IV (Proc. Sem. Habay-la-Neuve, Belgium, 1999) (WAGEMANS, C., et al., Eds), World Scientific, Singapore (2000) 257–266. [2.1.118] ALEXANDER, J.M., CORYELL, C.D., Nuclear charge distribution in the fission of uranium and thorium with 13.6-MeV deuterons, Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 1274–1279. [2.1.119] HICKS, H.G., et al., Fission product yields of uranium bombarded with deuterons of various energies (20–190 MeV), Phys. Rev. 100 (1955) 1284–1286. [2.1.120] BEIZIN, S.D., et al., Fission of actinides by 3 He ions with energy 60 MeV, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 50 (1989) 201–206. [2.1.121] BEIZIN, S.D., et al., Fission of actinides by 60 MeV 3 232 233,235,236,238 He ions Th, U, 238,239,240,242 244 Pu, Cm nuclei, Yad. Fiz. 50 (1989) 320–329. [2.1.122] GRUZINTSEV, E.N., et al., Fission of mercury nuclei in reactions induced by protons, 3He ions, and alpha particles, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 45 (1987) 959–964. [2.1.123] REEDER, P.L., Mass spectrometric determination of Rb fission yields from 3He and 4He induced fission of 238U and 232Th, Can. J. Chem. 61 (1983) 786–794.
Page 1 and 2: Fission Product Yield Data for the
Page 3 and 4: AFGHANISTAN ALBANIA ALGERIA ANGOLA
Page 5 and 6: COPYRIGHT NOTICE All IAEA scientifi
Page 7 and 8: CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Denschlag, J.-
Page 9 and 10: 3.2.1. Introduction . . . . . . . .
Page 11 and 12: 6. BENCHMARK EXERCISE . . . . . . .
Page 13 and 14: However, this CRP entered an entire
Page 15 and 16: ‘Provisional masses’ are determ
Page 17 and 18: Three scientists were invited to pa
Page 19 and 20: 8 (d) Prompt or delayed neutron emi
Page 21: [2.1.40] ITKIS, M.G., OGANESSIAN, Y
Page 25 and 26: [2.1.152] JACOBS, E., et al., Produ
Page 27 and 28: 16 2.2. MEASUREMENTS OF THE ENERGY
Page 29 and 30: FIG. 2.2.3. 94 Sr: best experimenta
Page 31 and 32: FIG. 2.2.15. 132 Te: best experimen
Page 33 and 34: FIG. 2.2.27. 146 Ba: best experimen
Page 36 and 37: 3. EVALUATIONS 3.1. ACTINIDE NUCLEO
Page 38 and 39: 3.1.2. Statistical model At least t
Page 40 and 41: J Â K=-J 2 2 2 ^ sym Krot ( U, J)
Page 42 and 43: nuclei with N > 144. However, for h
Page 44 and 45: neutron number. The observed fissio
Page 46 and 47: FIG. 3.1.6. 235 U(n,f) fission cros
Page 48 and 49: FIG. 3.1.10. 237 Np(n,f) fission cr
Page 50 and 51: from higher fission chances [3.1.43
Page 52 and 53: [3.1.48] DUSHIN, V.N., et al., Stat
Page 54 and 55: where Y S is our new standard, and
Page 56 and 57: TABLE 3.2.2. EVALUATED REFERENCE FI
Page 58 and 59: TABLE 3.2.2. EVALUATED REFERENCE FI
Page 60 and 61: TABLE 3.2.3. EVALUATED REFERENCE YI
Page 62 and 63: TABLE 3.2.3. EVALUATED REFERENCE YI
Page 64 and 65: The comparisons of our evaluated da
Page 66 and 67: TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
Page 72 and 73:
TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
TABLE 3.2.8. COMPARISON OF THE UNCE
Page 96:
REFERENCES TO SECTION 3.2 [3.2.1] I
Page 99 and 100:
where N C , N U are the modified an
Page 101 and 102:
activities were recorded with a pro
Page 103 and 104:
3.3.4. Results and discussion The r
Page 105 and 106:
FIG. 3.3.10. Li Ze et al. data: com
Page 107 and 108:
96 Annex 3.3.1 EVALUATED EXPERIMENT
Page 109 and 110:
Li Ze et al. [3.3.8] Thierens et al
Page 111 and 112:
100 Annex 3.3.3 EVALUATED DATA SET
Page 113 and 114:
The range of target nuclides availa
Page 115 and 116:
condensation of cross-sections by t
Page 117 and 118:
(h) REFERENCE (C,80KIEV,171,1980) i
Page 119 and 120:
uncertainties of the calculation. T
Page 122 and 123:
4. SYSTEMATICS AND MODELS FOR THE P
Page 124 and 125:
FIG. 4.1.2. 235 U total cross-secti
Page 126 and 127:
FIG. 4.1.9. Total and mode separate
Page 128 and 129:
4.2. SYSTEMATICS OF FISSION PRODUCT
Page 130 and 131:
A - = (PA - NT)/2 (4.2.1b) 4.2.2.3.
Page 132 and 133:
FIG. 4.2.4(a). 238 U + 5.5 MeV n, L
Page 134 and 135:
FIG. 4.2.8(a). U238 + 300 MeV p, LS
Page 136 and 137:
TABLE 4.2.1. EQUATIONS FOR SYSTEMAT
Page 138 and 139:
values (points) and the derived fun
Page 140 and 141:
distributions. Values of N(A) seldo
Page 142 and 143:
FIG. 4.2.19. Systematic Z P paramet
Page 144 and 145:
FIG. 4.2.21. Systematic Z P paramet
Page 146 and 147:
FIG. 4.2.23. Nuclear charge displac
Page 148 and 149:
FIG. 4.2.24. Number of protons emit
Page 150 and 151:
epresenting model values and thus s
Page 152 and 153:
FIG. 4.2.36. n T(A) for CF249T. FIG
Page 154 and 155:
FIG. 4.2.41. U235T, line: model; po
Page 156 and 157:
The FAST subroutine in the CYFP pro
Page 158 and 159:
[4.2.28] BELHAFAF, D., et al., Kine
Page 160 and 161:
4.3. FIVE GAUSSIAN SYSTEMATICS FOR
Page 162 and 163:
Derived from measured data Fitted r
Page 164 and 165:
FIG. 4.3.7. Mass distribution of 23
Page 166 and 167:
FFIG. 4.3.12. Mass distribution of
Page 168 and 169:
4.4. PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR FRA
Page 170 and 171:
where = 2mE is the wavelength, E
Page 172 and 173:
FIG. 4.4.4. Fragment mass distribut
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
fragment mass distributions are des
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
FIG. 4.4.10. Fragment mass distribu
Page 182 and 183:
P LD È Ê * E - 44. 7ˆ ˘ = Í1 +
Page 184 and 185:
FIG. 4.4.13. Pre-neutron emission m
Page 186 and 187:
FIG. 4.4.15. Post-neutron emission
Page 188 and 189:
FIG. 4.4.17. Post-neutron emission
Page 190 and 191:
fragment mass and charge distributi
Page 192 and 193:
of the energy dependence of the fus
Page 194 and 195:
4.5. MODAL APPROACH TO THE DESCRIPT
Page 196 and 197:
This information was used for the p
Page 198 and 199:
two neighbouring isotopes at differ
Page 200 and 201:
FIG.4.5.2. Experimental relative ma
Page 202 and 203:
Frequently, the yields Y i (M) are
Page 204 and 205:
the nine optimum description parame
Page 206 and 207:
TABLE 4.5.6. RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS
Page 208 and 209:
TABLE 4.5.8. RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS
Page 210 and 211:
Extracted values of s 2 M,S demonst
Page 212 and 213:
FIG. 4.5.10. Fission fragment charg
Page 214 and 215:
FIG. 4.5.12. Unchanged charge densi
Page 216 and 217:
FIG. 4.5.16. Mass yield variance fo
Page 218 and 219:
FIG. 4.5.20. Experimental mass yiel
Page 220 and 221:
[4.5.24] GOVERDOVSKII, A.A., MITROF
Page 222 and 223:
TABLE 4.6.1. FISSION PRODUCT YIELD
Page 224 and 225:
TABLE 4.6.2. FIT PARAMETER VALUES O
Page 226 and 227:
FIG. 4.6.2. Charge distributions fo
Page 228 and 229:
model which is elucidated elsewhere
Page 230 and 231:
the agreement is better. The observ
Page 232 and 233:
inner barrier is much lower than th
Page 234 and 235:
e determined in a self-consistent m
Page 236 and 237:
FIG. 4.6.11. Overview of the coupli
Page 238 and 239:
cross-section also has to be incorp
Page 240 and 241:
FIG. 4.6.16. Same as Fig. 4.6.15, b
Page 242 and 243:
FIG. 4.6.20. Pre-neutron emission m
Page 244 and 245:
present have a reasonable contribut
Page 246 and 247:
TABLE 4.6.5. ACCURACIES OBTAINED FR
Page 248 and 249:
[4.6.7] BEIJERS, J.P.M., et al., Se
Page 250 and 251:
5. NEW MODELS AND SYSTEMATICS: DEFI
Page 252 and 253:
therefore his benchmark calculation
Page 254 and 255:
mass distributions and practically
Page 256 and 257:
5.2. BENCHMARK EXERCISE 5.2.1. Benc
Page 258 and 259:
thorough and detailed analysis of t
Page 260 and 261:
the fissioning nucleus and the numb
Page 262:
should be undertaken — such a stu
Page 265 and 266:
experimental method in order to der
Page 267 and 268:
256 Valley heights and peak-to-vall
Page 269 and 270:
FIG. 6.2.3. Benchmark exercise, par
Page 271 and 272:
260 Wahl uncert. margins Wahl uncer
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
264 Wahl uncert. margins (adj. Wahl
Page 277 and 278:
Wahl (1.6-160 MeV): Distributions a
Page 279 and 280:
TABLE 6.2.2. 238 U PRE-NEUTRON EMIS
Page 281 and 282:
as most features are very similar t
Page 283 and 284:
FIG. 6.2.14. Benchmark exercise, pa
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
278 REFERENCES TO SECTION 6 [6.1] B
Page 291 and 292:
As mentioned above, the mass distri
Page 293 and 294:
I.3.2.6. Liu Conggui et al. [I.8] M
Page 295 and 296:
after prompt-neutron emission, and
Page 297 and 298:
286 Zöller (1995) 89-110 MeV, post
Page 299 and 300:
(1) Data were linearly interpolated
Page 301 and 302:
1. 290 Annex to Appendix I RECOMMEN
Page 303 and 304:
1.2. E n = 5.5 MeV 292 Nagy et al.
Page 305 and 306:
1.3. E n ª 8 MeV 294 Chapman (1978
Page 307 and 308:
1.5. E n = 14-15 MeV 296 Daroczy et
Page 309 and 310:
1.7. E n = 27.5 (22-33) MeV, Zölle
Page 311 and 312:
1.9. E n = 99.5 (89-110) MeV, Zöll
Page 313 and 314:
3. 302 239 Pu NEUTRON INDUCED FISSI
Page 316 and 317:
Appendix II DATA ADJUSTMENT FOR MAS
Page 318 and 319:
Vivès [II.8], Zöller [II.7] and
Page 320 and 321:
Annex 1 to Appendix II ADJUSTED DAT
Page 322 and 323:
Zöller (1995) [II.7] E n = 13 (11.
Page 324 and 325:
E n = 50 (45-55) MeV Post-neutron e
Page 326 and 327:
Äystö et al. (1998) [II.9] E p =
Page 328 and 329:
E n = 1.60 MeV Pre-neutron emission
Page 330 and 331:
E n = 27.5 (22-33) MeV Post-neutron
Page 332 and 333:
E n = 99.5 (89-110) MeV Post-neutro
Page 334 and 335:
Appendix III FISSION YIELD SYSTEMAT
Page 336 and 337:
FIG. III.6. Dependence of chain yie
Page 338 and 339:
TABLE III.2. Ln(y)-LINEAR(E) FIT CO
Page 340 and 341:
FIG. III.14. Dependence of paramete
Page 342 and 343:
FIG. III.26. Comparison of the mass
Page 344 and 345:
FIG. III.38. Comparison of the mass
Page 346 and 347:
TABLE III.3. QUADRATIC FUNCTION FIT
Page 348 and 349:
Uncertainty ratio or uncertainty Ad
Page 350:
CONTENTS OF THE CD-ROM The attached
Page 353:
This publication reports on a coord
show all

Fission Product Yield Data for the Transmutation of Minor Actinide ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?