[4.2.28] BELHAFAF, D., et al., Kinetic energy distributions around symmetric <strong>the</strong>rmal fission <strong>of</strong> U 234 and U 236 , Z. Phys. A 309 (1983) 253–259. [4.2.29] WAHL, A.C., Nuclear-charge distribution and delayed-neutron yields <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal-neutroninduced fission <strong>of</strong> 235 U, 233 U and 239 Pu and <strong>for</strong> spontaneous fission <strong>of</strong> 252 Cf, At. <strong>Data</strong> Nucl. <strong>Data</strong> Tables 39 (1988) 1–156. [4.2.30] HOWERTON, R.J., n – revisited, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 62 (1977) 438–454. [4.2.31] DJEBARA, M., et al., Mass and nuclear-charge yields <strong>for</strong> 249 Cf(n th ,f) at different fission-product kinetic energies, Nucl. Phys. A 496 (1989) 346– 366. [4.2.32] TRACY, B.L., et al., Rb and Cs isotopic cross sections from 40–60 MeV proton fission <strong>of</strong> 238 U, 232 Th and 235 U, Phys. Rev. C 5 (1972) 222–234. [4.2.33] NIKKINEN, L., Independent yields <strong>of</strong> Rb, In and Cs isotopes in <strong>the</strong> proton-induced fission <strong>of</strong> 232 Th, Phys. Rev. C 22 (1980) 617–626. [4.2.34] MANERO, F., KONSHIN, V.A., Status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> energy-dependent n – -values <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> heavy isotopes (Z > 90) from <strong>the</strong>rmal to 15 MeV and <strong>of</strong> n – -values <strong>for</strong> spontaneous fission, At. Energy Rev. 10 (1972) 637–756. [4.2.35] AXTON, E.J., “Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal neutron constants <strong>of</strong> 233 U, 235 U, 239 Pu and 241 Pu and <strong>the</strong> fission neutron yield <strong>of</strong> 252 Cf”, Nuclear Standard Reference <strong>Data</strong> (Proc. Advisory Group Mtg Geel, 1984), IAEA-TECDOC-335, IAEA, Vienna (1985) 214–234. [4.2.36] JAMES, M.F., et al., A New Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fission</strong> <strong>Product</strong> <strong>Yield</strong>s and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Product</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a New Library (UKFY2) <strong>of</strong> Independent and Cumulative <strong>Yield</strong>s, Part 1, Methods and Outline <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Evaluation, Rep. AEA-TRS-1015, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (1991). [4.2.37] DERUYTTER, A.J., et al., “Recent differential low energy cross sections and <strong>the</strong>rmal evaluations”, Nuclear <strong>Data</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Calculation <strong>of</strong> Thermal Reactor Reactivity Coefficients (Proc. Advisory Group Mtg Vienna, 1987), IAEA- TECDOC-491, IAEA, Vienna (1989) 115–123 . [4.2.38] TERRELL, J., Neutron yields from individual fission fragments, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 880–904. [4.2.39] APALIN, V.F., et al., Neutron emission from U 233 , U 235 and Pu 239 fission fragments, Nucl. Phys. 71 (1965) 553–560. [4.2.40] MASLIN, E.E., et al., Prompt neutron emission from U-235 fission fragments, Phys. Rev. 164 (1967) 1520–1527. [4.2.41] BOLDEMAN, J.W., et al., Prompt neutrons from 236 U fission fragments, Aust. J. Phys. 24 (1971) 821–833. [4.2.42] MILLER, R., Fragment velocities, energies and masses from fast neutron induced fission <strong>of</strong> 235 U, Phys. Rev. C 29 (1984) 885–905. [4.2.43] BOWMAN, H.R., et al., Fur<strong>the</strong>r studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prompt neutrons from <strong>the</strong> spontaneous fission <strong>of</strong> Cf-252, Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 2133–2147. [4.2.44] SIGNARBIEUX, C., et al., “Étude expérimentale de la corrélation entre les nombres de neutrons prompts émis par les deux fragments complémentaires dans la fission spontanée de 252 Cf”, Physics and Chemistry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fission</strong> 1973 (Proc. 3rd IAEA Symp. Rochester, NY, 1973), Vol. 2, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (1974) 179–188. [4.2.45] WALSH, R.L., BOLDEMAN, J.W., Fine [4.2.46] structure in <strong>the</strong> neutron emission n(A) from 252 Cf spontaneous fission fragments, Nucl. Phys. A 276 (1977) 189–200. GINDLER, J., Dependence <strong>of</strong> neutron yield on fragment mass <strong>for</strong> several low-energy fissioning systems, Phys. Rev. C 19 (1979) 1806–1819. [4.2.47] SCHMIDT, R., HENSCHEL, H., Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spontaneous fission <strong>of</strong> 244 Cm and 252 Cf, Nucl. Phys. A 395 (1983) 29–43. [4.2.48] HENKEL, R.L., “<strong>Fission</strong> by fast neutrons”, Fast Neutron Physics, Part II (MARION, J.B., FOWLER, J.L., Eds), Interscience (1963) 2006, 2016. [4.2.49] VANDENBOSCH, R., HUIZENGA, J.R., [4.2.50] Nuclear <strong>Fission</strong>, Academic Press, New York 1973. GOLDBERG, M.D., et al., Neutron Cross Sections, Z = 61 to 87, Rep. BNL-325, Vol. IIC, 2nd edn, Supplement 2, Brookhaven National Laboratory, NY (1966). [4.2.51] BRITT, H.C., WHETSTONE, S.L., Jr., Alphaparticle-induced fission <strong>of</strong> Th230 , Th 232 and U 233 , Phys. Rev. 133 (1964) B603–B613. [4.2.52] CHEIFETZ, E., et al., Measurement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prompt neutrons emitted in <strong>the</strong> fission <strong>of</strong> 209 Bi and 238 U induced by 155-MeV protons, Phys. Rev. C 2 (1970) 256–288. [4.2.53] DIKSIC, M., et al., Nuclear charge dispersion in mass chains 130–135 from <strong>the</strong> fission <strong>of</strong> 238U by medium energy protons, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 36 (1974) 7–16. [4.2.54] SARKAR, S., YAFFE, L., Nuclear charge distribution in <strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong> symmetric fission <strong>of</strong> 238U by protons <strong>of</strong> energy 20–85 MeV, Can. J. Chem. 54 (1976) 2349–2358. [4.2.55] CHEIFETZ, E., FRAENKEL, Z., Prompt neutrons from fission <strong>of</strong> U-238 induced by 12 MeV protons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21 (1968) 36–39. [4.2.56] BURNETT, S.C., et al., Neutron emission and fission energetics in <strong>the</strong> proton-induced fission <strong>of</strong> 233U and 238U, Phys. Rev. C 3 (1970) 2034–2048. [4.2.57] BISHOP, C.J., et al., Excitation energy dependence <strong>of</strong> neutron yields and fragment kinetic energy release in <strong>the</strong> proton-induced fission <strong>of</strong> 233 238 U and U, Nucl. Phys. A 150 (1970) 129–142. 147
[4.2.58] LEACHMAN, R.B., “Determinations <strong>of</strong> fission quantities <strong>of</strong> importance to reactors”, Peaceful Uses <strong>of</strong> Atomic Energy (Proc. Int. Conf. Geneva, 1955), Vol. 2, Physics: Research Reactors, United Nations, New York (1956) 193– 200. 148 [4.2.59] MADLAND, D.G., ENGLAND, T.R., The influence <strong>of</strong> isomeric states on independent fission product yields, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 64 (1977) 859–865. [4.2.60] RUDSTAM, G., Studsvik Neutron Research Laboratory, Nyköping, Sweden, personal communication, 1992.
- Page 1 and 2:
Fission Product Yield Data for the
- Page 3 and 4:
AFGHANISTAN ALBANIA ALGERIA ANGOLA
- Page 5 and 6:
COPYRIGHT NOTICE All IAEA scientifi
- Page 7 and 8:
CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Denschlag, J.-
- Page 9 and 10:
3.2.1. Introduction . . . . . . . .
- Page 11 and 12:
6. BENCHMARK EXERCISE . . . . . . .
- Page 13 and 14:
However, this CRP entered an entire
- Page 15 and 16:
‘Provisional masses’ are determ
- Page 17 and 18:
Three scientists were invited to pa
- Page 19 and 20:
8 (d) Prompt or delayed neutron emi
- Page 21 and 22:
[2.1.40] ITKIS, M.G., OGANESSIAN, Y
- Page 23 and 24:
[2.1.96] PATE, B.D., et al., Distri
- Page 25 and 26:
[2.1.152] JACOBS, E., et al., Produ
- Page 27 and 28:
16 2.2. MEASUREMENTS OF THE ENERGY
- Page 29 and 30:
FIG. 2.2.3. 94 Sr: best experimenta
- Page 31 and 32:
FIG. 2.2.15. 132 Te: best experimen
- Page 33 and 34:
FIG. 2.2.27. 146 Ba: best experimen
- Page 36 and 37:
3. EVALUATIONS 3.1. ACTINIDE NUCLEO
- Page 38 and 39:
3.1.2. Statistical model At least t
- Page 40 and 41:
J Â K=-J 2 2 2 ^ sym Krot ( U, J)
- Page 42 and 43:
nuclei with N > 144. However, for h
- Page 44 and 45:
neutron number. The observed fissio
- Page 46 and 47:
FIG. 3.1.6. 235 U(n,f) fission cros
- Page 48 and 49:
FIG. 3.1.10. 237 Np(n,f) fission cr
- Page 50 and 51:
from higher fission chances [3.1.43
- Page 52 and 53:
[3.1.48] DUSHIN, V.N., et al., Stat
- Page 54 and 55:
where Y S is our new standard, and
- Page 56 and 57:
TABLE 3.2.2. EVALUATED REFERENCE FI
- Page 58 and 59:
TABLE 3.2.2. EVALUATED REFERENCE FI
- Page 60 and 61:
TABLE 3.2.3. EVALUATED REFERENCE YI
- Page 62 and 63:
TABLE 3.2.3. EVALUATED REFERENCE YI
- Page 64 and 65:
The comparisons of our evaluated da
- Page 66 and 67:
TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 68 and 69:
TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 70 and 71:
TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 72 and 73:
TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 74 and 75:
TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 76 and 77:
TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 78 and 79:
TABLE 3.2.4. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 80 and 81:
TABLE 3.2.5. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 82 and 83:
TABLE 3.2.5. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 84 and 85:
TABLE 3.2.5. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 86 and 87:
TABLE 3.2.5. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 88 and 89:
TABLE 3.2.5. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 3.2.6. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 92 and 93:
TABLE 3.2.7. COMPARISON OF RECOMMEN
- Page 94 and 95:
TABLE 3.2.8. COMPARISON OF THE UNCE
- Page 96:
REFERENCES TO SECTION 3.2 [3.2.1] I
- Page 99 and 100:
where N C , N U are the modified an
- Page 101 and 102:
activities were recorded with a pro
- Page 103 and 104:
3.3.4. Results and discussion The r
- Page 105 and 106:
FIG. 3.3.10. Li Ze et al. data: com
- Page 107 and 108: 96 Annex 3.3.1 EVALUATED EXPERIMENT
- Page 109 and 110: Li Ze et al. [3.3.8] Thierens et al
- Page 111 and 112: 100 Annex 3.3.3 EVALUATED DATA SET
- Page 113 and 114: The range of target nuclides availa
- Page 115 and 116: condensation of cross-sections by t
- Page 117 and 118: (h) REFERENCE (C,80KIEV,171,1980) i
- Page 119 and 120: uncertainties of the calculation. T
- Page 122 and 123: 4. SYSTEMATICS AND MODELS FOR THE P
- Page 124 and 125: FIG. 4.1.2. 235 U total cross-secti
- Page 126 and 127: FIG. 4.1.9. Total and mode separate
- Page 128 and 129: 4.2. SYSTEMATICS OF FISSION PRODUCT
- Page 130 and 131: A - = (PA - NT)/2 (4.2.1b) 4.2.2.3.
- Page 132 and 133: FIG. 4.2.4(a). 238 U + 5.5 MeV n, L
- Page 134 and 135: FIG. 4.2.8(a). U238 + 300 MeV p, LS
- Page 136 and 137: TABLE 4.2.1. EQUATIONS FOR SYSTEMAT
- Page 138 and 139: values (points) and the derived fun
- Page 140 and 141: distributions. Values of N(A) seldo
- Page 142 and 143: FIG. 4.2.19. Systematic Z P paramet
- Page 144 and 145: FIG. 4.2.21. Systematic Z P paramet
- Page 146 and 147: FIG. 4.2.23. Nuclear charge displac
- Page 148 and 149: FIG. 4.2.24. Number of protons emit
- Page 150 and 151: epresenting model values and thus s
- Page 152 and 153: FIG. 4.2.36. n T(A) for CF249T. FIG
- Page 154 and 155: FIG. 4.2.41. U235T, line: model; po
- Page 156 and 157: The FAST subroutine in the CYFP pro
- Page 160 and 161: 4.3. FIVE GAUSSIAN SYSTEMATICS FOR
- Page 162 and 163: Derived from measured data Fitted r
- Page 164 and 165: FIG. 4.3.7. Mass distribution of 23
- Page 166 and 167: FFIG. 4.3.12. Mass distribution of
- Page 168 and 169: 4.4. PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR FRA
- Page 170 and 171: where = 2mE is the wavelength, E
- Page 172 and 173: FIG. 4.4.4. Fragment mass distribut
- Page 174 and 175: FIG. 4.4.6. Fragment mass distribut
- Page 176 and 177: fragment mass distributions are des
- Page 178 and 179: FIG. 4.4.9. Fragment mass distribut
- Page 180 and 181: FIG. 4.4.10. Fragment mass distribu
- Page 182 and 183: P LD È Ê * E - 44. 7ˆ ˘ = Í1 +
- Page 184 and 185: FIG. 4.4.13. Pre-neutron emission m
- Page 186 and 187: FIG. 4.4.15. Post-neutron emission
- Page 188 and 189: FIG. 4.4.17. Post-neutron emission
- Page 190 and 191: fragment mass and charge distributi
- Page 192 and 193: of the energy dependence of the fus
- Page 194 and 195: 4.5. MODAL APPROACH TO THE DESCRIPT
- Page 196 and 197: This information was used for the p
- Page 198 and 199: two neighbouring isotopes at differ
- Page 200 and 201: FIG.4.5.2. Experimental relative ma
- Page 202 and 203: Frequently, the yields Y i (M) are
- Page 204 and 205: the nine optimum description parame
- Page 206 and 207: TABLE 4.5.6. RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS
- Page 208 and 209:
TABLE 4.5.8. RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS
- Page 210 and 211:
Extracted values of s 2 M,S demonst
- Page 212 and 213:
FIG. 4.5.10. Fission fragment charg
- Page 214 and 215:
FIG. 4.5.12. Unchanged charge densi
- Page 216 and 217:
FIG. 4.5.16. Mass yield variance fo
- Page 218 and 219:
FIG. 4.5.20. Experimental mass yiel
- Page 220 and 221:
[4.5.24] GOVERDOVSKII, A.A., MITROF
- Page 222 and 223:
TABLE 4.6.1. FISSION PRODUCT YIELD
- Page 224 and 225:
TABLE 4.6.2. FIT PARAMETER VALUES O
- Page 226 and 227:
FIG. 4.6.2. Charge distributions fo
- Page 228 and 229:
model which is elucidated elsewhere
- Page 230 and 231:
the agreement is better. The observ
- Page 232 and 233:
inner barrier is much lower than th
- Page 234 and 235:
e determined in a self-consistent m
- Page 236 and 237:
FIG. 4.6.11. Overview of the coupli
- Page 238 and 239:
cross-section also has to be incorp
- Page 240 and 241:
FIG. 4.6.16. Same as Fig. 4.6.15, b
- Page 242 and 243:
FIG. 4.6.20. Pre-neutron emission m
- Page 244 and 245:
present have a reasonable contribut
- Page 246 and 247:
TABLE 4.6.5. ACCURACIES OBTAINED FR
- Page 248 and 249:
[4.6.7] BEIJERS, J.P.M., et al., Se
- Page 250 and 251:
5. NEW MODELS AND SYSTEMATICS: DEFI
- Page 252 and 253:
therefore his benchmark calculation
- Page 254 and 255:
mass distributions and practically
- Page 256 and 257:
5.2. BENCHMARK EXERCISE 5.2.1. Benc
- Page 258 and 259:
thorough and detailed analysis of t
- Page 260 and 261:
the fissioning nucleus and the numb
- Page 262:
should be undertaken — such a stu
- Page 265 and 266:
experimental method in order to der
- Page 267 and 268:
256 Valley heights and peak-to-vall
- Page 269 and 270:
FIG. 6.2.3. Benchmark exercise, par
- Page 271 and 272:
260 Wahl uncert. margins Wahl uncer
- Page 273 and 274:
262 Wahl uncert. margins Wahl uncer
- Page 275 and 276:
264 Wahl uncert. margins (adj. Wahl
- Page 277 and 278:
Wahl (1.6-160 MeV): Distributions a
- Page 279 and 280:
TABLE 6.2.2. 238 U PRE-NEUTRON EMIS
- Page 281 and 282:
as most features are very similar t
- Page 283 and 284:
FIG. 6.2.14. Benchmark exercise, pa
- Page 285 and 286:
274 Wahl uncert. margins Wahl uncer
- Page 287 and 288:
276 Wahl uncert. margins Wahl uncer
- Page 289 and 290:
278 REFERENCES TO SECTION 6 [6.1] B
- Page 291 and 292:
As mentioned above, the mass distri
- Page 293 and 294:
I.3.2.6. Liu Conggui et al. [I.8] M
- Page 295 and 296:
after prompt-neutron emission, and
- Page 297 and 298:
286 Zöller (1995) 89-110 MeV, post
- Page 299 and 300:
(1) Data were linearly interpolated
- Page 301 and 302:
1. 290 Annex to Appendix I RECOMMEN
- Page 303 and 304:
1.2. E n = 5.5 MeV 292 Nagy et al.
- Page 305 and 306:
1.3. E n ª 8 MeV 294 Chapman (1978
- Page 307 and 308:
1.5. E n = 14-15 MeV 296 Daroczy et
- Page 309 and 310:
1.7. E n = 27.5 (22-33) MeV, Zölle
- Page 311 and 312:
1.9. E n = 99.5 (89-110) MeV, Zöll
- Page 313 and 314:
3. 302 239 Pu NEUTRON INDUCED FISSI
- Page 316 and 317:
Appendix II DATA ADJUSTMENT FOR MAS
- Page 318 and 319:
Vivès [II.8], Zöller [II.7] and
- Page 320 and 321:
Annex 1 to Appendix II ADJUSTED DAT
- Page 322 and 323:
Zöller (1995) [II.7] E n = 13 (11.
- Page 324 and 325:
E n = 50 (45-55) MeV Post-neutron e
- Page 326 and 327:
Äystö et al. (1998) [II.9] E p =
- Page 328 and 329:
E n = 1.60 MeV Pre-neutron emission
- Page 330 and 331:
E n = 27.5 (22-33) MeV Post-neutron
- Page 332 and 333:
E n = 99.5 (89-110) MeV Post-neutro
- Page 334 and 335:
Appendix III FISSION YIELD SYSTEMAT
- Page 336 and 337:
FIG. III.6. Dependence of chain yie
- Page 338 and 339:
TABLE III.2. Ln(y)-LINEAR(E) FIT CO
- Page 340 and 341:
FIG. III.14. Dependence of paramete
- Page 342 and 343:
FIG. III.26. Comparison of the mass
- Page 344 and 345:
FIG. III.38. Comparison of the mass
- Page 346 and 347:
TABLE III.3. QUADRATIC FUNCTION FIT
- Page 348 and 349:
Uncertainty ratio or uncertainty Ad
- Page 350:
CONTENTS OF THE CD-ROM The attached
- Page 353:
This publication reports on a coord