03.04.2013 Views

Analysis by Key: Another Look at Modulation

Analysis by Key: Another Look at Modulation

Analysis by Key: Another Look at Modulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13i3SS<br />

ANALYSIS BY KEY<br />

Example 13 shows how the prolonged F chord of Ex. 12 is continued. If we<br />

think of the large bass motion F - (AW ) - C as an unfolded fifth, the D th<strong>at</strong><br />

follows the C would represent a sixth. Th<strong>at</strong> D, in turn, leads to the G minor <strong>by</strong><br />

the motion of a descending fifth. To sum up, the bass line th<strong>at</strong> spans the f1rst<br />

two of this section's three inner groupings constitutes the unfolding or<br />

horizontaliz<strong>at</strong>ion of the contrapuntal progression 5-6-5 (F-C, F-D, G-D).<br />

Ex. 13 Mozart: Le Nozze di Figaro, Act II, 'Voi che sapete', bs 35-52<br />

(g)(R @ ? '<br />

b > S_f S 5-h S<br />

Ap 4Hl ' ,-?<br />

r s 1l - 1 ; j ; ccomC > X j ; becOmes n<br />

l-'9P:rEf's6b:-')> r C rtv f>>t<br />

[llltOl(lillZ P ( [) (,<br />

After the G minor cadence, the vocal line moves to its clax on eS2,<br />

intensified <strong>by</strong> a doubling <strong>at</strong> the higher octave in the flute (bs 58-9). There is an<br />

apparent discrepancy between the melody and the harmony here. The melody<br />

note has a higher syntactic value than the brief C minor chord th<strong>at</strong> supports it;<br />

eS 2 prepares the seventh over the prolonged V shown in Ex. 11, whereas the C<br />

minor has no such large-scale function. This syntactic value is reflected in the<br />

sonic emphasis Mozart accords the eW 2 as the event th<strong>at</strong> caps an extended phase<br />

of increasinf intensity. Functioning within a larger context (from b.52), the<br />

climactic eS rel<strong>at</strong>es obliquely to the last high-level bass note, the G of b. 52; the<br />

reappearance of G in b.58 helps to clarify this connection. Since the vocal line in<br />

these bars unfolds a fourth bS l eS 2, the passage as a whole projects an ES sixth<br />

chord (G in bass, Bb and ES in soprano). Understood this way, bs 52-8 continue<br />

the earlier 5-6-5 altern<strong>at</strong>ion with another sixth, G-EW, an interval of the<br />

middleground not literally present on the surface but clearly plied <strong>by</strong> context<br />

(Ex. 14). In b.60, the G transfers from the bass into an upper part (oboe doubled<br />

<strong>by</strong> the violins), where it continues up to A and then on to BS in the reprise. The<br />

linear structure th<strong>at</strong> governs the plan of modul<strong>at</strong>ion is thus a rising fourthprogression<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ed to those found in the Bach Allemande and Beethoven Son<strong>at</strong>a<br />

discussed earlier (Exs 9 and 10). In addition to the obvious differences in key<br />

succession, the Mozart also differs in th<strong>at</strong> the bass adds the root of V below the<br />

rising linear progression to allow a strong harmonic resolution into the reprise.<br />

Example 15 presents three middleground views of the B section. From it we<br />

can see how a repe<strong>at</strong>ed detail - the use of the enharmonic note-pair C,tt /DS<br />

MUSIC ANALYSIS 6: 3, 1987 311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!