Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Cmt.#
A-19
Page #
Line #
Appendix
F, Section
2.5, Pg 2-3
New Page
or Sheet
Section
2.6, Pg
2-3, Line
19-20
Comment
Were all in-house QC limits
met?
A-20 General Some minor typo and spelling
throughout.
A-21
3-2 Section
3.2, Pg
3-2, Lines
24-26
A-22 3-4 Pg 3-4 to
3-7
Recommendation
Response
2.4 Explosives - A total of 17 multiincrement
samples were submitted
for explosives analysis to
TestAmerica; thirteen samples for
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) and
four soil samples for RDX analyses.
2.5 Propellants - Five soil samples
were submitted to TestAmerica for
nitroguanidine, nitroglycerine and
nitrocellulose analysis.”
Include a statement. A sentence will be added to this
section that states the following:
“All LCG and non-LCG QC
(propellants) outliers were within the
allowable limits.”
Read through again. Report will be subjected to another
QC review for typographical and
spelling errors.
USACE (Rick Hockett, Rec’d 27 Mar 2008)
Section 3.2. Groundwater
monitoring should have been
performed in accordance with
the 2004 document Facilitywide
Groundwater Monitoring
Program Plan. USACE had
several conversations with Shaw
personnel prior to the sampling
event and explained these
details.
Section 3.2.8. Background
values for inorganic compounds
have been developed for
RVAAP.
Shaw Environmental, Inc. 13 of 39
Please verify that the FWGWMP
requirements were followed, and
state this in the text.
Include a discussion of the relation
of the detected inorganic compounds
with the RVAAP background levels.
The last sentence in Section 3.2 will
be revised as follows: “Groundwater
sampling activities were performed
in accordance with the requirements
of the Facility-wide Sampling and
Analysis Plan (FSAP; SAIC 2001),
the FWGWMP Plan (USACE 2004),
and the Shaw Field Sampling Plan
(FSP; Shaw 2006b).”
Discussion regarding a comparison
of the detected inorganic compounds
to RVAAP background levels will
be included in Section 3.2.8 as
follows: