03.04.2013 Views

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cmt.#<br />

A-7<br />

A-8<br />

A-9<br />

A-10<br />

Page #<br />

Line #<br />

Appendix<br />

C and F,<br />

Pg 1-3<br />

Appendix<br />

C and F,<br />

Pg 1-6<br />

Appendix<br />

C and F,<br />

General<br />

Appendix<br />

C and F,<br />

New Page<br />

or Sheet<br />

App C,<br />

Section<br />

Comment<br />

“Adherence to <strong>the</strong> LCG<br />

QC/MRL requirements was not<br />

required <strong>for</strong> this<br />

project……<strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e; corrective<br />

action was not required <strong>for</strong><br />

QC/MRL results outside <strong>the</strong><br />

LCG control limits.<br />

The last sentence should<br />

probably say “…each test panel<br />

in each sample delivery group or<br />

data package” ra<strong>the</strong>r than “in<br />

each sample”.<br />

Apparently, data qualifications<br />

were not per<strong>for</strong>med in<br />

accordance with <strong>the</strong> LCG.<br />

Tables 1 through 10 in <strong>the</strong> LCG<br />

provide explicit instruction on<br />

how <strong>the</strong> data should be qualified<br />

based upon QC outliers.<br />

Please also include <strong>the</strong> sample<br />

preparation methods, where<br />

Shaw Environmental, Inc. 8 of 39<br />

Recommendation<br />

MRLs would be required if <strong>the</strong> work<br />

was contracted to follow <strong>the</strong> LCG<br />

unless specifically stated o<strong>the</strong>rwise.<br />

Response<br />

blank and in LCS, no<br />

qualification was assigned.<br />

(i) PCBs: As shown in Table 2-<br />

2 recoveries of<br />

decafluorobiphenyl were<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> allowable limits<br />

of 50-150% <strong>for</strong> samples<br />

LL2ss-062, LL3ss-085,<br />

LL3ss-092, LL1ss-017, and<br />

LL3ss-073. Thus, <strong>the</strong><br />

results will be qualified “J”<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>se samples.<br />

(j) Explosives: Samples LL3ss-<br />

088 and LL3ss-098 were<br />

extracted outside <strong>the</strong> holding<br />

time. The results of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

samples will be qualified<br />

“J”.<br />

This sentence was introduced<br />

unintentionally. The statement will<br />

be removed.<br />

Correct if applicable. For both Appendix C and F, this<br />

sentence in Section 1.3 has been<br />

revised to state: “..each test panel in<br />

each sample delivery group or data<br />

Review <strong>the</strong> LCG guidelines <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

qualification of analytical data.<br />

package..”<br />

The LCG guidelines <strong>for</strong> data<br />

qualification will be reviewed and a<br />

section summarizing data<br />

qualifications will be included in<br />

Appendix C and F. For text to be<br />

included in <strong>the</strong>se appendices, please<br />

see response to Comment A-6.<br />

Include. The report will be revised to include<br />

sample preparation method when

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!