Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cmt.#<br />
A-4<br />
Page #<br />
Line #<br />
Section<br />
3.6.2, Pg<br />
3-13<br />
New Page<br />
or Sheet<br />
Pg 3-17,<br />
Section<br />
3.6.2,<br />
Line 30-<br />
32<br />
Comment<br />
Please indicate <strong>the</strong> analyses each<br />
laboratory was responsible <strong>for</strong>.<br />
A-5 Tables B-1 Screening criteria should be<br />
included on <strong>the</strong> sample results<br />
tables <strong>for</strong> groundwater.<br />
A-6<br />
Appendix<br />
C and F,<br />
Section 1.2<br />
App C,<br />
Added<br />
Section<br />
2.8<br />
Am puzzled by <strong>the</strong> statement<br />
“data qualifiers were not<br />
assigned based on data<br />
verification findings”.<br />
Shaw Environmental, Inc. 3 of 39<br />
Recommendation<br />
Response<br />
3.6.1 that states “It should be noted<br />
that <strong>the</strong> reduction of <strong>the</strong> sample<br />
volume prior to shipment deviated<br />
from <strong>the</strong> methodology outlined in<br />
<strong>the</strong> RAWP but was approved by<br />
USACE and <strong>the</strong> OhioEPA prior to<br />
implementation in <strong>the</strong> field.”<br />
Add a table or some text. The following will be added to this<br />
section after <strong>the</strong> first sentence:<br />
“Shaw contracted both laboratories<br />
to ensure adequate turn-aroundtimes<br />
were achieved in conjunction<br />
with Shaw’s aggressive excavation<br />
schedule. Both laboratories<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med analyses <strong>for</strong><br />
benzo(a)pyrene, 2,4,6-TNT and<br />
metals. In addition to <strong>the</strong>se<br />
analyses, Test America analyzed<br />
solely <strong>for</strong> propellants and PCBs and<br />
RDX samples were analyzed only by<br />
Include a column(s) <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
appropriate screening criteria and<br />
bold anything that exceeds criteria.<br />
Clarify if based upon <strong>the</strong> data<br />
evaluation no data qualifiers were<br />
required or if this is to be interpreted<br />
that <strong>the</strong> data verification process did<br />
not include data qualification. Note<br />
<strong>the</strong> latter statement is not correct.<br />
See comment 9.<br />
Kemron.”<br />
Shaw will include <strong>the</strong> screening<br />
criteria used in <strong>the</strong> FWGWMP into<br />
<strong>the</strong> sample results table <strong>for</strong><br />
groundwater.<br />
Section 2.8 – Data Qualifications<br />
will be added to <strong>the</strong> Groundwater<br />
Data Verification <strong>Report</strong> in<br />
Appendix C. The text will go as<br />
follows:<br />
“Data qualifications have been<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med in accordance to LCG.<br />
The qualification “UJ” is defined as<br />
<strong>the</strong> estimates (J) to non-detects (U)<br />
<strong>for</strong> non metals. It is to be noted that<br />
LCG has a much stringent (or<br />
difficult) QA/QC criteria (except <strong>for</strong><br />
VOC) than SW-846, Contract