03.04.2013 Views

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cmt.#<br />

A-4<br />

Page #<br />

Line #<br />

Section<br />

3.6.2, Pg<br />

3-13<br />

New Page<br />

or Sheet<br />

Pg 3-17,<br />

Section<br />

3.6.2,<br />

Line 30-<br />

32<br />

Comment<br />

Please indicate <strong>the</strong> analyses each<br />

laboratory was responsible <strong>for</strong>.<br />

A-5 Tables B-1 Screening criteria should be<br />

included on <strong>the</strong> sample results<br />

tables <strong>for</strong> groundwater.<br />

A-6<br />

Appendix<br />

C and F,<br />

Section 1.2<br />

App C,<br />

Added<br />

Section<br />

2.8<br />

Am puzzled by <strong>the</strong> statement<br />

“data qualifiers were not<br />

assigned based on data<br />

verification findings”.<br />

Shaw Environmental, Inc. 3 of 39<br />

Recommendation<br />

Response<br />

3.6.1 that states “It should be noted<br />

that <strong>the</strong> reduction of <strong>the</strong> sample<br />

volume prior to shipment deviated<br />

from <strong>the</strong> methodology outlined in<br />

<strong>the</strong> RAWP but was approved by<br />

USACE and <strong>the</strong> OhioEPA prior to<br />

implementation in <strong>the</strong> field.”<br />

Add a table or some text. The following will be added to this<br />

section after <strong>the</strong> first sentence:<br />

“Shaw contracted both laboratories<br />

to ensure adequate turn-aroundtimes<br />

were achieved in conjunction<br />

with Shaw’s aggressive excavation<br />

schedule. Both laboratories<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med analyses <strong>for</strong><br />

benzo(a)pyrene, 2,4,6-TNT and<br />

metals. In addition to <strong>the</strong>se<br />

analyses, Test America analyzed<br />

solely <strong>for</strong> propellants and PCBs and<br />

RDX samples were analyzed only by<br />

Include a column(s) <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

appropriate screening criteria and<br />

bold anything that exceeds criteria.<br />

Clarify if based upon <strong>the</strong> data<br />

evaluation no data qualifiers were<br />

required or if this is to be interpreted<br />

that <strong>the</strong> data verification process did<br />

not include data qualification. Note<br />

<strong>the</strong> latter statement is not correct.<br />

See comment 9.<br />

Kemron.”<br />

Shaw will include <strong>the</strong> screening<br />

criteria used in <strong>the</strong> FWGWMP into<br />

<strong>the</strong> sample results table <strong>for</strong><br />

groundwater.<br />

Section 2.8 – Data Qualifications<br />

will be added to <strong>the</strong> Groundwater<br />

Data Verification <strong>Report</strong> in<br />

Appendix C. The text will go as<br />

follows:<br />

“Data qualifications have been<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med in accordance to LCG.<br />

The qualification “UJ” is defined as<br />

<strong>the</strong> estimates (J) to non-detects (U)<br />

<strong>for</strong> non metals. It is to be noted that<br />

LCG has a much stringent (or<br />

difficult) QA/QC criteria (except <strong>for</strong><br />

VOC) than SW-846, Contract

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!