03.04.2013 Views

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RTC <strong>for</strong> Draft LL1-4 <strong>Remedial</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Completion</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Cmt.#<br />

Page #<br />

Line #<br />

Comment<br />

technician and date recorded. Examples<br />

(may not be all inclusive): LL1ss-009; and,<br />

LL1ss-023.<br />

A-103 Boring Logs (Specific) Sample times and/or dates were missing<br />

on a few logs. Examples (may not be all<br />

inclusive): LL1ss-021; LL1ss-029; LL1-<br />

005; LL2ss-050; and, LL3ss-072.<br />

A-104 Boring Logs (Specific) Sample #LL1ss-035 had two dates<br />

recorded on <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong> log. Please<br />

clarify.<br />

A-105 Boring Logs (Specific) Analyses requested were missing from log<br />

LL3-003-413.<br />

Cmt.#<br />

A-106<br />

Page #<br />

Line #<br />

Document Distribution<br />

List<br />

Comment<br />

OHARNG – RTLS (Katie Elgin)<br />

NGB is listed as getting 3 hard copies and<br />

3 electronic copies of <strong>the</strong> document. I am<br />

not sure who you sent <strong>the</strong>se documents<br />

Recommendation<br />

Response<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work. go over protocol with field crews to<br />

ensure changes are properly<br />

changed/completed on all logs.<br />

No response required – please<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />

No response required – please<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />

Recommendation<br />

Comment noted. In future, we will<br />

go over protocol with field crews to<br />

ensure changes are properly<br />

changed/completed on all logs.<br />

The two dates on <strong>the</strong> log sheet <strong>for</strong><br />

LL1ss-035 reflect <strong>the</strong> days that <strong>the</strong><br />

crews were working at that<br />

excavation location (8/23 and 8/24).<br />

Typically, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining log<br />

sheets only <strong>the</strong> actual sample dates<br />

were noted. The sample <strong>for</strong> LL1ss-<br />

035 was collected on 8/24 as verified<br />

by <strong>the</strong> COC (lab report no<br />

A7H240252) <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample collected<br />

from <strong>the</strong> excavation.<br />

Comment noted. In future, we will<br />

go over protocol with field crews to<br />

ensure changes are properly<br />

changed/completed on all logs. For<br />

record, this was a stockpile sample<br />

that was analyzed <strong>for</strong> full waste<br />

characterization analyses. Analyses<br />

included full TCLP, PCBs,<br />

nitroaromatics and nitramines and<br />

RCRA characteristics. LL3-004-414<br />

was a stockpile sample as well that<br />

was analyzed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

constituents.<br />

Response<br />

Agreed. Submissions to NGB are a<br />

result of <strong>the</strong> distribution list required<br />

under Shaw’s contract. With<br />

Shaw Environmental, Inc. 12 of 13 June 20, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!