Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RTC <strong>for</strong> Draft LL1-4 <strong>Remedial</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Completion</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Cmt.#<br />
Page #<br />
Line #<br />
Comment<br />
couple pages (sample L0705315,<br />
L071600) that: “Sample past 12 hour tune<br />
limit.” There is no corresponding asterisk<br />
on this page to go with <strong>the</strong> note. It is<br />
unclear as to what this means. (Page<br />
numbers are cut off.)<br />
A-90 Appendices (specific) App H, A7J020173, pg 6. The text<br />
indicates that Test America assumed that<br />
<strong>the</strong> TCLP analyses were not subject to<br />
USACE Louisville Chemistry Guidelines.<br />
The lab should not make assumptions like<br />
this. Any questions <strong>the</strong> lab has should be<br />
verified with <strong>the</strong> contractor (in consultation<br />
with USACE and Ohio EPA).<br />
A-91 Appendices (specific) App H, A7J030108, pg 28 – percent<br />
recoveries out of limits should be flagged.<br />
(Also applicable to several sheets in App<br />
H, L0711045.)<br />
A-92 Appendices (specific) Kemron TCLP non-volatile document<br />
control number sheets are not peer<br />
reviewed nor signed by a supervisor<br />
(L0710454, L0711045). These should be<br />
signed in future projects.<br />
A-93 Appendices (specific) Cover sheet <strong>for</strong> App I, L08010047 should<br />
read Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant (not<br />
Depot).<br />
A-94 Appendices (specific) App J, L0711258 – On <strong>the</strong> metals data<br />
verification checklist <strong>for</strong> Sb, Se, and Tl on<br />
page 1 – both yes and no are checked on<br />
question number 5. Clarify.<br />
A-95 Boring Logs (General) On future projects, have a sign-off line <strong>for</strong><br />
a reviewer. This person would basically<br />
act as a QA/QC person and make any<br />
Recommendation<br />
Response<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work. with <strong>the</strong> lab to determine<br />
discrepancy.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
Agree. Shaw will discuss with all<br />
labs on future work because it is<br />
both a requirement and contractual<br />
issue as to what <strong>the</strong>y signed up <strong>for</strong><br />
and <strong>the</strong>y are not unilaterally in<br />
charge of making judgment<br />
decisions.<br />
Comment noted – we will revisit this<br />
with <strong>the</strong> lab <strong>for</strong> future reports.<br />
Comment noted – we will revisit this<br />
with <strong>the</strong> lab <strong>for</strong> future reports.<br />
Comment noted – we will revisit this<br />
with <strong>the</strong> lab <strong>for</strong> future reports.<br />
Comment noted – we will revisit this<br />
with <strong>the</strong> lab to determine<br />
discrepancy.<br />
Comment noted – this will be added<br />
to boring logs on future work.<br />
Shaw Environmental, Inc. 10 of 13 June 20, 2008