03.04.2013 Views

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RTC <strong>for</strong> Draft LL1-4 <strong>Remedial</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Completion</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Cmt.#<br />

Page #<br />

Line #<br />

Comment<br />

A-73 Appendices (specific) App C (data verification report <strong>for</strong> metals)<br />

– Page 4 (first verification report) indicates<br />

items were omitted, but it wasn’t clear<br />

what those items were. (This is just one<br />

example of several instances.)<br />

A-74 Appendices (specific) Are <strong>the</strong> copies of <strong>the</strong> data verification<br />

reports that are in <strong>the</strong> final project file<br />

signed?<br />

A-75 Appendices (specific) In several of <strong>the</strong> data verification reports,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is missing in<strong>for</strong>mation – ex. missing<br />

explosives in<strong>for</strong>mation in <strong>the</strong> first<br />

verification report (App C).<br />

A-76 Appendices (specific) Verifier should check typing – uses<br />

exclamation points a number of times <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> numeral “1” throughout. Also check<br />

Recommendation<br />

No response required – please<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />

No response required – please<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />

No response required – please<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />

No response required – please<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />

Response<br />

specified in <strong>the</strong> work plan. In all, a<br />

total of 17 MS/MSD samples were<br />

collected which amounts to greater<br />

than 10% of <strong>the</strong> total confirmatory<br />

samples collected (163).<br />

It should be noted that <strong>the</strong> Draft<br />

Closeout <strong>Report</strong> incorrectly stated<br />

that no MS/MSD sample was<br />

collected <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> SVOC sample<br />

group. One MS/MSD sample was<br />

collected <strong>for</strong> SVOCs and Table 3-4<br />

will be revised to incorporate this<br />

correction.<br />

Comment noted – we will revisit this<br />

with <strong>the</strong> lab <strong>for</strong> future reports.<br />

All data verification reports will be<br />

signed by <strong>the</strong> Shaw Project Chemist<br />

in <strong>the</strong> final version of <strong>the</strong> closeout<br />

report.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> Appendix C data verification<br />

report (groundwater), <strong>the</strong> table of<br />

contents requires revision. Missing<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation in this report (ie.<br />

explosives and VOCs) are included<br />

in <strong>the</strong> report and <strong>the</strong> appropriate<br />

sections will be referenced in <strong>the</strong><br />

table of contents. Propellants were<br />

not identified in groundwater and<br />

reference to this section will be<br />

removed from <strong>the</strong> table of contents.<br />

Shaw will review all o<strong>the</strong>r data<br />

verification reports to ensure <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are no o<strong>the</strong>r discrepancies.<br />

Agreed. This is an avoidable<br />

mistake. This will be discussed with<br />

lab and technical team.<br />

Shaw Environmental, Inc. 7 of 13 June 20, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!