Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RTC <strong>for</strong> Draft LL1-4 <strong>Remedial</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Completion</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
Cmt.#<br />
Page #<br />
Line #<br />
Comment<br />
A-73 Appendices (specific) App C (data verification report <strong>for</strong> metals)<br />
– Page 4 (first verification report) indicates<br />
items were omitted, but it wasn’t clear<br />
what those items were. (This is just one<br />
example of several instances.)<br />
A-74 Appendices (specific) Are <strong>the</strong> copies of <strong>the</strong> data verification<br />
reports that are in <strong>the</strong> final project file<br />
signed?<br />
A-75 Appendices (specific) In several of <strong>the</strong> data verification reports,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is missing in<strong>for</strong>mation – ex. missing<br />
explosives in<strong>for</strong>mation in <strong>the</strong> first<br />
verification report (App C).<br />
A-76 Appendices (specific) Verifier should check typing – uses<br />
exclamation points a number of times <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> numeral “1” throughout. Also check<br />
Recommendation<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
No response required – please<br />
note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />
Response<br />
specified in <strong>the</strong> work plan. In all, a<br />
total of 17 MS/MSD samples were<br />
collected which amounts to greater<br />
than 10% of <strong>the</strong> total confirmatory<br />
samples collected (163).<br />
It should be noted that <strong>the</strong> Draft<br />
Closeout <strong>Report</strong> incorrectly stated<br />
that no MS/MSD sample was<br />
collected <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> SVOC sample<br />
group. One MS/MSD sample was<br />
collected <strong>for</strong> SVOCs and Table 3-4<br />
will be revised to incorporate this<br />
correction.<br />
Comment noted – we will revisit this<br />
with <strong>the</strong> lab <strong>for</strong> future reports.<br />
All data verification reports will be<br />
signed by <strong>the</strong> Shaw Project Chemist<br />
in <strong>the</strong> final version of <strong>the</strong> closeout<br />
report.<br />
For <strong>the</strong> Appendix C data verification<br />
report (groundwater), <strong>the</strong> table of<br />
contents requires revision. Missing<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation in this report (ie.<br />
explosives and VOCs) are included<br />
in <strong>the</strong> report and <strong>the</strong> appropriate<br />
sections will be referenced in <strong>the</strong><br />
table of contents. Propellants were<br />
not identified in groundwater and<br />
reference to this section will be<br />
removed from <strong>the</strong> table of contents.<br />
Shaw will review all o<strong>the</strong>r data<br />
verification reports to ensure <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are no o<strong>the</strong>r discrepancies.<br />
Agreed. This is an avoidable<br />
mistake. This will be discussed with<br />
lab and technical team.<br />
Shaw Environmental, Inc. 7 of 13 June 20, 2008