03.04.2013 Views

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RTC <strong>for</strong> Draft LL1-4 <strong>Remedial</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Completion</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Cmt.#<br />

Page #<br />

Line #<br />

Comment<br />

A-66 Table B-4 Why are <strong>the</strong>re so many “NA”s on <strong>the</strong><br />

tables? Please clarify.<br />

A-67 Appendices (General) Change <strong>the</strong> cover pages, title and spine to<br />

match <strong>the</strong> title of <strong>the</strong> main text of <strong>the</strong><br />

report.<br />

A-68 Please send a copy of <strong>the</strong> bills of lading<br />

and manifests to my office so I can have a<br />

quick look at <strong>the</strong>m. If I cannot review <strong>the</strong>m<br />

by <strong>the</strong> 30JUN08 deadline; this will not<br />

have any impact on project approval.<br />

A-69 Verification needed. 100% of <strong>the</strong> data was<br />

verified. Was a minimum of 10% of <strong>the</strong><br />

data validated by an independent third<br />

party? Please clarify.<br />

A-70 Thanks <strong>for</strong> sending along <strong>the</strong> field logs. I<br />

will look at <strong>the</strong>m as soon as possible.<br />

A-71 Please make sure waybills are included in<br />

<strong>the</strong> official project file to complete <strong>the</strong><br />

chain of custody.<br />

A-72 Clarify <strong>the</strong> lack of MS/MSD samples <strong>for</strong> a<br />

number of sample groups.<br />

Recommendation<br />

No response required – please<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />

No response required – please<br />

note <strong>for</strong> future work.<br />

Response<br />

<strong>for</strong> VOCs.<br />

The NAs <strong>for</strong> certain chemicals<br />

indicates <strong>the</strong> sample was not<br />

analyzed <strong>for</strong> that particular chemical<br />

in that sample. There are a large<br />

number of NAs on <strong>the</strong> table because<br />

an expanded analyte list was used<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> same method (8260B and<br />

8270C) on <strong>the</strong> second set of<br />

samples as compared to <strong>the</strong> first.<br />

The extended lists were not<br />

requested by Shaw and were run by<br />

<strong>the</strong> laboratory by mistake.<br />

Regardless of <strong>the</strong> list, no VOC and<br />

SVOC impact above allowable<br />

backfill thresholds were detected.<br />

The title will be changed to match<br />

<strong>the</strong> Cover and Title page. See<br />

Comment A-2.<br />

Copies of <strong>the</strong> BOLs and Manifests<br />

will be <strong>for</strong>warded during week of 22<br />

June 2008.<br />

Shaw validated 100% of <strong>the</strong><br />

received data <strong>for</strong> samples collected<br />

during <strong>the</strong> work prior to inclusion <strong>for</strong><br />

accuracy. Shaw did not have data<br />

validated by an independent third<br />

party.<br />

Your welcome and thanks <strong>for</strong> your<br />

prompt attention.<br />

Comment noted – we will retain<br />

waybills and include in files on future<br />

work.<br />

Shaw collected MS/MSD samples at<br />

a minimum frequency of 5% (1 per<br />

20 samples) <strong>for</strong> all sample groups as<br />

Shaw Environmental, Inc. 6 of 13 June 20, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!