Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Remedial</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Completion</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
June 2008<br />
Remediation of Soils and Dry Sediments at RVAAP 08-11 (LLs 1-4)<br />
Page 7-1<br />
7.0 FINAL INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION<br />
7.1 REMEDIAL ACTION CONTRACT INSPECTIONS<br />
Field inspections were per<strong>for</strong>med by <strong>the</strong> on-site QC Manger using <strong>the</strong> USACE three-phase<br />
control system consisting of <strong>the</strong> preparatory, initial and follow-up inspections phases in<br />
accordance with <strong>the</strong> Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP; Shaw 2006d). Deficiencies<br />
observed were noted in <strong>the</strong> daily reports and corrected as soon as reasonably possible to ensure<br />
compliance with contract requirements. Representatives of <strong>the</strong> USACE, Ohio EPA, and RVAAP<br />
were on-site to inspect <strong>the</strong> remediation activities at regular intervals and conveyed any concerns<br />
or discrepancies to <strong>the</strong> on-site Shaw management <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> necessary action.<br />
7.2 HEALTH AND SAFETY<br />
All remedial action field activities were per<strong>for</strong>med in accordance with <strong>the</strong> requirements of <strong>the</strong><br />
SHERP (Shaw 2004e) and its associated addendum (Shaw 2007d). No health and safety issues<br />
were encountered during <strong>the</strong> implementation of field activities. All personnel requiring access to<br />
<strong>the</strong> LLs 1-4 maintained current HAZWOPER certification. Daily safety briefings were held<br />
every morning and included all field personnel. Monthly project safety audits/inspections were<br />
carried out by both <strong>the</strong> on-site Shaw Safety Officer and <strong>the</strong> Shaw Project Manager or his<br />
designee.<br />
7.3 REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION<br />
On December 10, 2007, a walkthrough and inspection was per<strong>for</strong>med at LLs 1-4 by members of<br />
USACE, <strong>the</strong> Ohio EPA, BRACD, Shaw, and PIKA. The purpose of <strong>the</strong> walkthrough was to<br />
review Shaw’s soil removal activities at LLs 1-4 and decontamination/demolition activities that<br />
were per<strong>for</strong>med simultaneously by PIKA at LLs 2-4 and to provide comment and<br />
recommendation prior to issuing a certificate of completion. On January 9, 2008, <strong>the</strong> Ohio EPA<br />
submitted a letter (Ohio EPA 2008a) to Mr. Mark Patterson, <strong>the</strong> RVAAP Facility Manager,<br />
indicating that “<strong>the</strong> physical remedial action of soil and dry sediment removal has been<br />
completed in accordance with <strong>the</strong> intents and provisions of <strong>the</strong> Interim ROD <strong>for</strong> LLs 1-4”. The<br />
letter contained reservations that follow-up re-grading and seeding would be required at <strong>the</strong> LLs<br />
1-4 excavation areas once <strong>the</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>r was conducive to such activities and that subsequent to<br />
<strong>the</strong>se activities, a final walkthrough would be conducted.<br />
*** FINAL***