Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Remedial</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Completion</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
June 2008<br />
3.6.4.4 Load Line 4<br />
Remediation of Soils and Dry Sediments at RVAAP 08-11 (LLs 1-4)<br />
Page 3-21<br />
At LL 4, <strong>the</strong>re were a total of nine (9) discrete areas (LL4ss-106-cs through -114-cs) that<br />
required excavation (Figure A-4). The COCs at LL 4 consisted of Aroclor-1254 and <strong>the</strong> metals<br />
aluminum, lead, and manganese. One excavation location, LL4ss-108-cs, did require<br />
re-excavation due to a manganese concentration of 5,300 mg/kg that was above <strong>the</strong> cleanup goal<br />
of 1,800 mg/kg <strong>for</strong> manganese in surface soils (0 to 1 foot). After <strong>the</strong> removal of <strong>the</strong> additional<br />
soils, a follow-up multi-increment sample was submitted <strong>for</strong> analysis <strong>for</strong> manganese and <strong>the</strong><br />
result was below <strong>the</strong> applicable cleanup goal. All <strong>the</strong> laboratory results <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> confirmatory<br />
multi-increment samples collected at LL 4 indicate that COCs have been removed to below<br />
cleanup goals at all excavation areas.<br />
3.7 DECONTAMINATION<br />
During excavation activities at each load line and loading of trucks <strong>for</strong> off-site disposal of soils,<br />
<strong>the</strong> heavy equipment and trucks were thoroughly inspected and decontaminated to remove all<br />
loose soil from buckets, tracks, and undercarriage prior to leaving <strong>the</strong> controlled area.<br />
Decontamination methods <strong>for</strong> heavy equipment between excavation areas and trucks during soil<br />
load out consisted of dry removal of soils and debris and wet brush washing depending on <strong>the</strong><br />
extent of residual soils on <strong>the</strong> equipment. <strong>Final</strong> decontamination of <strong>the</strong> heavy equipment<br />
following <strong>the</strong> completion of excavation activities consisted of steam cleaning. Fabricated<br />
decontamination pads capable of collecting wash water, including overspray, and loose soil were<br />
mobilized to <strong>the</strong> site prior to construction activities to avoid cross-contamination of clean areas<br />
during decontamination procedures and to collect decontamination liquids. As discussed in<br />
Section 3.3.6, Shaw provided all water <strong>for</strong> construction use, including decontamination of heavy<br />
equipment and vehicles. All decontamination liquids generated were pumped into and stored in<br />
55-gallon drums <strong>for</strong> characterization and off-site disposal. Disposal of this waste liquid is<br />
discussed in Section 4.0.<br />
3.8 SITE RESTORATION<br />
Backfill and restoration was per<strong>for</strong>med at each excavation area after approval of <strong>the</strong><br />
multi-increment laboratory data by USACE and <strong>the</strong> Ohio EPA. Backfill activities began in<br />
October 2007 after <strong>the</strong> receipt and approval of <strong>the</strong> initial multi-increment samples. Site<br />
restoration was per<strong>for</strong>med to return <strong>the</strong> disturbed areas to prior conditions and was<br />
“replace-in-kind”.<br />
Restoration included backfilling with clean soil from Route 5 Sand & Gravel, an off-site source<br />
that passed <strong>the</strong> chemical and physical requirements outlined in <strong>the</strong> RVAAP facility-wide plans.<br />
Due to <strong>the</strong> relative shallow depths of <strong>the</strong> excavations, <strong>the</strong> backfill was directly offloaded into <strong>the</strong><br />
excavation or placed by <strong>the</strong> Shaw excavator. The backfill material was compacted by <strong>the</strong><br />
excavator bucket or tracks. There were no changes to site elevation or drainage features. Once<br />
backfilled, an approved seed mix was applied, wea<strong>the</strong>r permitting, to <strong>the</strong> restored area.<br />
3.8.1 Grass Seed<br />
Shaw coordinated <strong>the</strong> required seed mixes with <strong>the</strong> RTLS Environmental Supervisor, Mr. Tim<br />
M<strong>org</strong>an, prior to mobilizing. Re-vegetation of disturbed areas was conducted in accordance with<br />
<strong>the</strong> requirements of <strong>the</strong> RTLS Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) as<br />
*** FINAL***