Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Remedial</strong> <strong>Action</strong> <strong>Completion</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
June 2008<br />
1.2.1 Load Lines 1 - 4<br />
Remediation of Soils and Dry Sediments at RVAAP 08-11 (LLs 1-4)<br />
Page 1-5<br />
Industrial operations at <strong>the</strong> RVAAP primarily consisted of 12 munitions assembly facilities<br />
referred to as “load lines.” LLs 1-4 were used between 1941 and 1971 to melt and load<br />
trinitrotoluene (TNT) and Composition B, a mixture of TNT and cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine<br />
(cyclonite or RDX), into large-caliber shells. The operations of <strong>the</strong> primary load lines produced<br />
explosive dust, spills and vapors that collected on <strong>the</strong> floors and walls of various process<br />
buildings. Periodically, <strong>the</strong> floors and walls would be cleaned with water and steam. The<br />
resulting liquid contained TNT and Composition B and was known as “pink water” <strong>for</strong> its<br />
characteristic color.<br />
Various industrial operations associated with <strong>the</strong> munitions loading process and munitions<br />
rehabilitation activities were also conducted during <strong>the</strong> operation of LLs 1-4. As a result of <strong>the</strong>se<br />
operational activities, soils, sediments, and o<strong>the</strong>r media became contaminated with explosives.<br />
In 1951, soils contaminated with accumulated explosives were removed from LL 1 and replaced<br />
with clean fill. No o<strong>the</strong>r remedial actions, except salvage and building demolition activities,<br />
have been conducted at LLs 1-4.<br />
The RVAAP has been inactive since 1992. The only activity still being carried out from <strong>the</strong><br />
wartime era is <strong>the</strong> infrequent demolition of munitions and explosives of concern (MEC) found at<br />
<strong>the</strong> RVAAP. The Army has completed <strong>the</strong> salvage activities and demolition at LLs 2-4, with <strong>the</strong><br />
exception of floor slabs and foundations which are contracted to be removed by o<strong>the</strong>rs in 2008.<br />
1.3 NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION<br />
The summary of <strong>the</strong> nature and extent of contaminated shallow soils and dry sediment <strong>for</strong> which<br />
<strong>the</strong> remedial action was per<strong>for</strong>med is based on <strong>the</strong> Phase I and II remedial investigations (RIs)<br />
<strong>for</strong> LLs 1-4 (SAIC 2003; Shaw 2004b, 2004c, 2004d). Evaluation and data collected <strong>for</strong> LLs 1-4<br />
during <strong>the</strong> Phase I and II RIs show that historical operations resulted in contamination of shallow<br />
soils and dry sediment primarily in <strong>the</strong> vicinity of <strong>for</strong>mer production buildings and in various<br />
settling tanks and drainage ditches near those buildings. The wash water from <strong>the</strong> floors and<br />
walls that contained contaminants infiltrated into <strong>the</strong> soils around <strong>the</strong> buildings, drained into <strong>the</strong><br />
network of storm sewers, or was directed by surface flow through channels to surface water. The<br />
chemicals of concern (COCs) included metals, explosives, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and<br />
semi-volatile <strong>org</strong>anic compounds (SVOCs). Based on evaluations conducted during <strong>the</strong> RIs,<br />
explosives were mobile in water and had <strong>the</strong> potential to leach from <strong>the</strong> soils. In<strong>org</strong>anics, PCBs<br />
and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were not expected to readily leach from soils.<br />
Contamination varied considerably within each load line by type and frequency of contaminant<br />
detected, concentration, and depth. Based on <strong>the</strong> RI data, LL 1 was <strong>the</strong> most contaminated (i.e.,<br />
widest variety of contaminants detected, highest frequency of COC detection, and highest COC<br />
concentrations) and LL 4 was <strong>the</strong> least contaminated of <strong>the</strong> four load lines.<br />
The soil and sediment contamination detected at LLs 1-4 was generally surficial in nature,<br />
between ground surface and 3 feet below ground surface (bgs). As mentioned previously, <strong>the</strong><br />
likelihood of migration was minimal <strong>for</strong> in<strong>org</strong>anics, PCBs and SVOCs identified as <strong>the</strong> COCs;<br />
however, explosive constituents may have leached from soils via infiltration. Based on <strong>the</strong><br />
available data, <strong>the</strong> estimated quantity of soils and dry sediments to be removed was 15,000 cubic<br />
*** FINAL***