Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Cmt.#
A-46
Page #
Line #
27, 31, 33
and 34
Section
3.2.3, line
18
New Page
or Sheet
Comment
wells are not already
existing. Would “baseline”
or “existing” be a better
word choice?
• Line 31. Remove “-“ after
the word “one”.
• Line 33. Revise
“redevelopment were
accomplished…”
A-47 General Was the “Ravenna full suite”,
including pesticides and
herbicides, analyzed for 10% of
samples? Even if the results
are in appendix, please address
in the report text as well.
A-48
A-49
Section
3.2.8, lines
22-23
Section
3.2.8
Line 23-
24
Recommendation
Response
• Line 31: “-“ will be removed after
the word “one” in line 31.
• Line 33: This sentence will be
revised to state”…redevelopment
were completed as required….”
• Line 34: reference to section
4.3.3.3.11.1 in the Facility-Wide
Sampling Plan is correct.
Line 34. Reference to section
4.3.2.3.11.1 is made. Please
verify that this is correct.
Change “form” to “from”. “form” will be changed to “from”.
Understand the sentence, but it
seems awkward. Would the
text read better if it stated that
“..the purpose of the initial
groundwater sampling
activities was to identify
presence of contaminants in
groundwater prior to initiation
of Shaw construction
activities…”?
It would be helpful of the
MCLs and secondary standards
Shaw Environmental, Inc. 35 of 39
Section 3.2.5 Field Quality Control
Sampling Procedures states
“Duplicate samples were collected at
a frequency of 10% of the field
sample collected”. This sentence
will be revised to state “Duplicate
samples for the full suite including
pesticides and herbicides were
collected at a frequency 10% of the
field samples collected.”
Shaw will revise this sentence to
state the following: “The purpose of
the initial groundwater sampling
activities was to identify presence of
contaminants in groundwater prior
to initiation of Shaw construction
activities.”
The MCLs, secondary standards,
Region 9 PRGs and RVAAP