03.04.2013 Views

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

Final Remedial Action Completion Report for the ... - Rvaap.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cmt.#<br />

A-36<br />

A-37<br />

A-38<br />

A-39<br />

A-40<br />

Page #<br />

Line #<br />

Page 2-1,<br />

lines 6 and<br />

7<br />

Page 2-1,<br />

line 19<br />

Section<br />

2.3, page<br />

2-2, lines<br />

1-6<br />

Section<br />

2.3.1, lines<br />

9-11<br />

Section<br />

2.3.2, lines<br />

14-19<br />

New Page<br />

or Sheet<br />

Comment<br />

Shaw has modified <strong>the</strong>m,<br />

please add Shaw logo/note<br />

with revision date.<br />

• Line 6: Is <strong>the</strong>re a typo after<br />

“U.S.C.”? Should <strong>the</strong><br />

character be “§”?<br />

• Line 7: Change “;” to “:”<br />

after <strong>the</strong> word “criteria”.<br />

Change “;” to “,” after <strong>the</strong> word<br />

“landfill”.<br />

No changes are necessary.<br />

USACE, Louisville, needs to<br />

issue a contract modification to<br />

de-scope <strong>the</strong> post-construction<br />

groundwater monitoring and<br />

slab maintenance; warranty<br />

period; and any de-scope related<br />

to seeding.<br />

States that USACE “has<br />

removed” <strong>the</strong> 5-year period of<br />

groundwater monitoring from<br />

Shaw’s scope of work.<br />

• Please revise <strong>the</strong> 1 st<br />

sentence of Section 2.3.2.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> sentence is<br />

understood, it is a run-on.<br />

• Recommend revising<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2 nd sentence of Section<br />

2.3.2 to indicate that BRAC has<br />

already contracted <strong>for</strong> removal<br />

of slabs and foundations at LL<br />

2, 3, and 4. BRAC started slab<br />

and foundation removal in<br />

Shaw Environmental, Inc. 32 of 39<br />

Recommendation<br />

Please revise to state <strong>the</strong> USACE<br />

“intends” to remove this from<br />

Shaw’s scope of work, since <strong>the</strong><br />

contract modification has not yet<br />

been processed. It is scheduled to be<br />

completed by 30 April 08.<br />

Response<br />

• On line 6, <strong>the</strong> symbol “t” will be<br />

replaced with “§”.<br />

• On line 7, “;” will be changed to<br />

“;” after <strong>the</strong> word “criteria”.<br />

On line 19, “;” will be changed to<br />

“,” after <strong>the</strong> work “landfill”.<br />

The sentence will be revised to state<br />

<strong>the</strong> following: “USACE intends to<br />

remove this task from Shaw’s scope<br />

of work and anticipates per<strong>for</strong>ming<br />

it under <strong>the</strong> Facility-Wide<br />

Groundwater Monitoring Program<br />

(FWGWMP) or ano<strong>the</strong>r contract.”<br />

• The 1 st sentence of Section<br />

2.3.2 will be revised to state <strong>the</strong><br />

following: “The selected remedy<br />

requires periodic monitoring of <strong>the</strong><br />

concrete slabs that remain in place to<br />

ensure that <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> slabs<br />

has not been compromised. The<br />

slabs provide adequate barriers to<br />

prevent precipitation from<br />

infiltrating to impacted soils<br />

beneath”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!