03.04.2013 Views

Janisova_Tuexenia 30

Janisova_Tuexenia 30

Janisova_Tuexenia 30

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Association 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />

Stellaria graminea <br />

Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia <br />

Teucrium chamaedrys <br />

Teucrium montanum <br />

Thesium linophyllon <br />

Thlaspi caerulescens <br />

Thlaspi perfoliatum <br />

Thymus praecox <br />

Thymus pulegioides <br />

Tithymalus cyparissias <br />

Tithymalus tommasinanus<br />

Tragopogon orientalis <br />

Trifolium dubium <br />

Trifolium montanum <br />

Trifolium pratense <br />

Trifolium repens <br />

Trifolium rubens <br />

Trisetum flavescens <br />

Trommsdorfia maculata <br />

Veronica officinalis <br />

Vicia cracca <br />

Vicia hirsuta <br />

Vicia sepium <br />

Vincetoxicum hirundinaria <br />

Viola canina <br />

Viola collina <br />

Viola hirta <br />

Viola lutea <br />

Viola tricolor <br />

References<br />

BALÁŽ, D. (1991): Fytocenologický a floristický výskum projektovanej ŠPR Mačková v Nízkych<br />

Tatrách (Phytosociological and floristic research in the projected state nature reserve Mačková in the<br />

Nízke Tatry Mts.) [In Slovak]. – Diplom thesis, Comenius University, Bratislava: 54 pp.<br />

BRAUN-BLANQUET, J. (1964): Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3 rd ed. – Springer,<br />

Wien: XIV + 865 pp.<br />

BRUELHEIDE, H. (1995): Die Grünlandgesellschaften des Harzes und ihre Standortsbedingungen. Mit<br />

einem Beitrag zum Gliederungsprinzip auf der Basis von statistisch ermittelten Artengruppen. –<br />

Diss. Bot. 244: 338 pp. Cramer, Berlin.<br />

– (1997): Using formal logic to classify communities. – Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 32: 41–46. Praha.<br />

– (2000): A new measure of fidelity and its application to defining species groups. – J. Veg. Sci. 11:<br />

167–178. Uppsala.<br />

–&CHYTRÝ, M. (2000): Towards unification of national vegetation classification: a comparison of two<br />

methods for analysis of large datasets. – J. Veg. Sci 11: 295–<strong>30</strong>6. Uppsala.<br />

CHYTRÝ, M. (2007) [Ed.]: Vegetace České republiky. 1. Travinná a keřičková vegetace (Vegetation of the<br />

Czech Republic. 1. Grassland and Heathland Vegetation) [in Czech, with English summary]. –<br />

Academia, Praha: 526 pp.<br />

–, TICHÝ, L., HOLT, J. & BOTTA-DUKÁT, Z. (2002): Determination of diagnostic species with statistical<br />

fidelity measures. – J. Veg. Sci. 13: 79–90. Uppsala.<br />

DENGLER, J., CHYTRÝ, M. & EWALD, J. (2008): Phytosociology. – In: JØRGENSEN, S. E., FATH, B. D.<br />

[Eds.]: Encyclopedia of Ecology: 2767–2779, Elsevier, Oxford.<br />

DIEKMANN, M. (1997): The differentiation of alliances in South Sweden. – Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon.<br />

32: 193–205. Praha.<br />

DÍTĚ, D., HÁJEK, M. & HÁJKOVÁ, P. (2007): Formal definitions of Slovak mire plant associations and<br />

their application in regional research. – Biologia 62: 400–408. Bratislava.<br />

DŽATKO, M., MASAT, K. & CAMBEL, B. (1989): Agroklimatické regióny SR (Agroclimatic regions of the<br />

Slovak Republic) [In Slovak]. – VCPÚ-ÚPVR, Bratislava: 123pp.<br />

419

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!