03.04.2013 Views

ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2012

ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2012

ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Refugee Context Considered<br />

By Jenni Millbank, Professor of Law, University of Technology Sydney<br />

Eddie Bruce-Jones, Lecturer in Law, Birkbeck College School of Law, University of London<br />

The <strong>ILGA</strong> Report on <strong>State</strong>-<strong>Sponsored</strong> <strong>Homophobia</strong> is a comprehensive outline of the legal<br />

status of same-sex sexual activity. However, it is very important to keep in mind that the<br />

question of legality of same-sex sexual activity does not determine the question whether<br />

people may be at risk of being persecuted in their countries of origin for engaging in such<br />

activity. Knowing that there is a difference between these two questions is vital for legal<br />

practitioners, policy makers and adjudicators in the refugee context.<br />

The 1951 Refugee Convention defines refugees in Article 1(A) as those who:<br />

“owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion,<br />

nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the<br />

country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail<br />

himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being<br />

outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is<br />

unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it.”<br />

Criminalisation of same-sex activity may be relevant to the determination of risk of<br />

persecution in a number of ways. The imposition of criminal sanctions by the <strong>State</strong> in and of<br />

itself may constitute persecution (UNHCR 2002; 2008). Criminal laws prohibiting gay sex,<br />

whether or not regularly enforced, render sexual minorities vulnerable to extortion,<br />

exploitation and other forms of abuse at the hand of both state and non-state actors. Such<br />

criminal laws systematically contribute to a failure of <strong>State</strong> protection, by preventing victims<br />

of homophobic violence from seeking and being provided assistance. Furthermore, criminal<br />

laws of this kind, whether or not enforced, contribute to persecutory environments, by<br />

stigmatising LGBTI people through official means. However the absence of, or repeal of,<br />

criminal proscriptions absolutely must not be taken as establishing the reverse proposition.<br />

Lack of explicit criminalisation of same-sex sexual activity does not prevent LGBTI people from<br />

facing extreme violence. The absence of criminalisation does not demonstrate the absence<br />

of risk of persecution and/or sufficiency of state protection. The question of legality of gay sex<br />

is only one element, and cannot alone be taken as an answer to the question of risk of<br />

persecution based on sexuality.<br />

<strong>ILGA</strong> has been given feedback that earlier incarnations of this report have been used in<br />

some refugee determination hearings as evidence that there is no real risk of persecution for<br />

lesbian or gay applicants from countries where either the law had been amended to<br />

decriminalise same-sex sexual activity or where there was no legal provision expressly<br />

criminalising the activity. This introduction urges readers of this document, in particular legal<br />

professionals, to think carefully and critically about its use in matters related to refugee and<br />

asylum claims. Specifically we urge readers to seek the most detailed, accurate and up to<br />

date country of origin information possible to place this information in context before use in<br />

any refugee determination.<br />

from the University of Gothenburg (Sweden), Roehampton University (UK) and University of Tromsø (Norway), as part<br />

of the Erasmus Mundus programme. Lucas has dedicated most of his academic and professional work to LGBT issues.<br />

He assisted Prof. Kees Waaldijk with his 2009 paper "Legal recognition of homosexual orientation in the countries of<br />

the world" and worked for the LGBT General Coordination from the Human Rights Secretary of the Presidency of Brazil<br />

from 2009 to 2010. He has been an intern at the International Centre for the Legal Protection of Human Rights<br />

(Interights) in London in 2011 and at the Permanent Mission of Brazil to the United Nations in Geneva in <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

<strong>State</strong>-<strong>Sponsored</strong> <strong>Homophobia</strong> – May <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>ILGA</strong> – The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association - www.ilga.org<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!