02.04.2013 Views

Historical studies

Historical studies

Historical studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It is clear therefore that cither of the readings of<br />

Manctho are within the limit of quarry dating.<br />

But if the longer reading be accepted the levy of<br />

men need not have taken place till April, which is the<br />

more likely course.<br />

The proposal of Meyer to cut this interval down<br />

to 300-400 years {iVacItlriii^cs. Acg. Cliron. 1908, p. 20)<br />

would throw the quarrying across the agricultural<br />

season, and cease it before the inundation rose and<br />

transport was most easy. This would entirely<br />

reverse the natural order of Egyptian work, and<br />

leave the stones for six months waiting for the next<br />

inundation ;<br />

fore impossible.<br />

such a shortening of the history is there-<br />

It is now evident that if we accept the Mesore<br />

year or the Thoth year for either event, or for both,<br />

or for neither, the only choice affected by that question<br />

is that between the higher and lower readings of<br />

Manetho. It seems that the only logical course<br />

(after Meyer's paper on the Mesore year named<br />

above) is to accept Mesore as the first month in<br />

both the xiith and the iiird dynasties ; and following<br />

the shorter readings of Manetho we should accept<br />

the date for the xiith dynasty 3579 to 3366<br />

THE LENGTH OF EGYPTIAN HISTORY<br />

(or 2 119 to 1906)<br />

and for the end of the iiird dynasty 4777<br />

(or 3317)-<br />

The quarrying then began on the 15th of March ;<br />

or, if later, then some of the longer readings of<br />

Manetho can be accepted.<br />

The Frequency of Monuments.<br />

28. As the number of monuments in a given period<br />

has been often taken as an indication of the time<br />

involved, it is well to see what is the frequency of<br />

monuments in various periods, in relation to the<br />

conditions of the civili.sation.<br />

We will first take the best ascertained periods,<br />

about the length of which there is no considerable<br />

question. The number of monuments is fairly ascer-<br />

tained by counting them in the Student's History;<br />

only as it would be impossible to include every ring<br />

and scarab with a king's name, the count is best<br />

restricted to buildings, statues, and stones with<br />

cartouches. To express the relative frequency the<br />

number of monuments per century is the clearest<br />

statement. It is not to be expected that a remote<br />

and a recent period should be comparable, as many<br />

conditions are adverse to the earlier age ; but<br />

periods within the same thousand years may be<br />

fairly contrasted, so as to see the extent of variation<br />

in different conditions of the country.<br />

As there is no considerable question about the<br />

lengths of the dynasties from the xviiith dynasty<br />

onward, we state here the number of monuments per<br />

century in each dynasty from that point.<br />

xviii 144 per century<br />

xix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!