02.04.2013 Views

IDA 1ST_Quarter 2010

IDA 1ST_Quarter 2010

IDA 1ST_Quarter 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES<br />

PROJECT<br />

GEOLOGICAL MAPPING, GEOCHEMICAL<br />

SURVEYS AND MINERAL RESOURCES<br />

ASSESSMENT IN SELECTED AREAS OF<br />

UGANDA<br />

QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong><br />

GTK CONSORTIUM<br />

Tapio Lehto, Yrjö Pekkala and Tapio Kuivasaari<br />

15.4.<strong>2010</strong><br />

Contract No.:MEMD/SMMRP/services/2006/000011 <strong>IDA</strong>


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

CONTENTS<br />

1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................4<br />

1.1. GENERAL.....................................................................................................4<br />

1.2. PROJECT ORGANISATION .......................................................................6<br />

1.3. PERSONNEL ................................................................................................6<br />

2. WORK CARRIED OUT........................................................................................8<br />

2.1. GEOLOGICAL MAPPING................................................................................9<br />

2.2. MINERAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT......................................................11<br />

2.2.1. Dimension stone.........................................................................................11<br />

2.2.2. Kaolin pegmatites ......................................................................................14<br />

2.2.3. Vermiculite ................................................................................................18<br />

2.2.4. Bentonite....................................................................................................20<br />

2.2.5. Carbonate rocks and other cement raw materials ......................................20<br />

2.2.6. Other raw materials of cement...................................................................23<br />

2.2.7. Tin and tungsten.........................................................................................23<br />

2.2.8. Field visits during the reporting period......................................................25<br />

2.3. MAP PRODUCTION .......................................................................................27<br />

2.4. TRAINING .......................................................................................................27<br />

3. UPDATED WORK PLAN ......................................................................................29<br />

3.1. PHASE I: DATA GATHERING AND PREPARATION...............................30<br />

3.1.1. Collection of data.......................................................................................30<br />

3.1.2. Processing of satellite images ....................................................................30<br />

3.1.3. Geochemical data.......................................................................................31<br />

3.1.4. Geophysical data........................................................................................31<br />

3.1.5. Geological and Mineral Resources data ....................................................32<br />

3.2. PHASE II: GEOLOGICAL SYNTHESIS, FIELD WORK AND<br />

COMPILATION OF MAPS....................................................................................32<br />

3.2.1. Interpretation of satellite imagery..............................................................33<br />

3.2.2. Geochemical surveys .................................................................................33<br />

3.2.3. Geophysical surveys ..................................................................................34<br />

3.2.4. Compilation of preliminary geological and mineral resources maps ........35<br />

3.2.5. Mapping of A-4 and B areas......................................................................35<br />

3.2.8. Mapping of selected 1:50k scale map sheets .............................................36<br />

3.2.9. Petrographic, geochemical and geochronological studies .........................36<br />

3.2.10. Mineral resources mapping......................................................................37<br />

3.2.11. Geological field data processing..............................................................38<br />

3.2.12. Draft final map products and reports .......................................................38<br />

3.3. PHASE III: FINAL PRODUCTS ....................................................................39<br />

3.3.1. Explanation texts to geological maps ........................................................39<br />

3.3.2. Preparation of geological and photo database and ArcGIS files ...............40<br />

3.3.3. Preparation of mineral occurrences database.............................................40<br />

3.3.4. Preparation of legend .................................................................................40<br />

3.3.5. Production of geological maps and observation database .........................41<br />

3.3.6. Production of digital map sheets................................................................41<br />

3.3.7. Final Technical Report...............................................................................41<br />

4. TRAINING PLAN...................................................................................................41<br />

4.1. OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................42<br />

4.2. ON-THE-JOB-TRAINING...............................................................................42<br />

4.3. TRAINING COURSES IN UGANDA.............................................................42<br />

2


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

4.4. OVERSEAS TRAINING..................................................................................43<br />

4.5. UPDATED TRAINING PLAN ........................................................................43<br />

5. EQUIPMENT INVENTORY ..............................................................................43<br />

APPENDICES<br />

1. Activity schedule, Updated Gantt Chart, April <strong>2010</strong><br />

2. Training courses carried out<br />

3. DGSM staff involved in training<br />

3


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1. GENERAL<br />

The Contract for a component in Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources<br />

Project (SMMRP), financed by International Development Association (<strong>IDA</strong>), by<br />

name ”Geological mapping, geochemical surveys and mineral resources assessment in<br />

selected areas of Uganda” was rewarded to GTK Consortium. It was signed by the<br />

Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, Mr F.A.<br />

Kabagambe-Kaliisa and by the Director of GTK South Finland office, Ms Karita Åker<br />

in Kampala October 6 th , 2008 (Contract No: MEMD/SMMRP/services/2006/000011).<br />

The GTK Consortium consists of GTK, Geological Survey of Finland (as leading<br />

partner), GAF AG from Germany, Council for Geoscience (CGS) from South Africa,<br />

International Institute for Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC) from The<br />

Netherlands and Fels Consultants Ltd (FCL) from Uganda.<br />

Geographically the project is defined by:<br />

In the south by the international border with Rwanda and Tanzania,<br />

In the west by the international border with the Democratic Republic of<br />

Congo (DRC),<br />

In the east by the international border with the Republic of Kenya, and<br />

In the north by the 1° N latitude.<br />

In total the approximate area concerned covers 21 full and 18 partial half-by-half<br />

degree sheets (1:100 000 scale), covered by existing, published maps of variable<br />

quality (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).<br />

4


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 1. Geological mapping for <strong>IDA</strong> component.<br />

Fig. 2. Geological mapping areas for <strong>IDA</strong> component.<br />

5


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

1.2. PROJECT ORGANISATION<br />

The GTK Consortium consists of partners who all have special strengths and fields of<br />

expertise. As a principal partner, GTK is responsible for the overall management and<br />

administration of the project. Experienced geologist teams from GTK, CGS and GAF<br />

are responsible for the geological mapping and mineral resources assessments. The<br />

production of various types of maps will be GTK’s responsibility. GAF AG with its<br />

strong background in GIS and satellite imagery interpretation concentrates on remote<br />

sensing and field verification of the interpretation.<br />

The planning and implementation of the geochemical surveys is a joint venture<br />

between DGSM, GTK and CGS. Processing and interpretation of airborne<br />

geophysics, including the planning and implementation of geophysical ground<br />

surveys, are carried out jointly by DGSM and GTK. For training, apart from the on<br />

the job training, the long and varied experience of ITC in organising formal training is<br />

exploited. In addition, the high level of mineral exploration and mining technology in<br />

South Africa will be utilized by CGS in their training.<br />

On the Service Provider’s side, the Management and Quality Control Committee<br />

(MQCC), composed of chosen members of the Consortium, chaired by GTK, will be<br />

responsible for internal monitoring of the project. The MQCC monitors managerial,<br />

quality, administrative and financial issues and makes decisions on proposed<br />

significant alterations in the action plan or staff, if needed. The members of the<br />

MQCC are: Yrjö Pekkala (GTK) as chairman, other members: Tobias Wever (GAF),<br />

Frik Hartzer (CGS) and Frank van Ruitenbeek (ITC).<br />

1.3. PERSONNEL<br />

The GTK Consortium staff operating in Uganda during the reporting period was as<br />

follows:<br />

Management and administration:<br />

Tapio Lehto, GTK, Project Manager<br />

Yrjö Pekkala, GTK, Special Assignments<br />

Geological mapping:<br />

Phil Westerhof, Westcourt Consultants, Senior Advisor Geodynamic Analysis<br />

Matti Lehtonen, GTK, Senior Advisor, Lithostratigraphy<br />

Tapio Koistinen, GTK, Senior Advisor, Major geological structures<br />

Hannu Mäkitie, GTK, Team leader geological mapping<br />

Tuomo Manninen, GTK, Senior Geologist<br />

Paavo Härmä, GTK, Senior Geologist, Deputy Team leader<br />

Petri Virransalo, GTK, Senior Geologist<br />

Kerstin Saalmann, GTK, Senior Structural Geologists<br />

Jussi Pokki, GTK, Geologist<br />

6


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Gerrit de Kock, CGS, Senior Structural Geologist<br />

Andreas Schumann, GAF, Senior Economic Geologist<br />

David Kyagulanyi, FCL, Senior Geologist<br />

Dominique Elepu, FCL, Senior Geologist<br />

Wilson Ongom, FCL, Technician, Mineral Resources<br />

Aaloni Waluganja, FCL, Technician, Mineral Resources<br />

Mineral Resources Assessment:<br />

Yrjö Pekkala, GTK; Senior Advisor, Industrial Minerals<br />

Tapio Kuivasaari, GTK, Senior Geologist, Mineral resources<br />

Geochemical Surveys:<br />

Reijo Salminen, GTK, Senior Advisor Geochemistry<br />

Esko Korkiakoski, GTK, Senior Geochemist<br />

Mikael Eklund, GTK, Geochemist<br />

Robert Netshitungulwana, CGS, Geochemist<br />

Geophysical surveys:<br />

Tapio Ruotoistenmäki, Senior Advisor Geophysics<br />

Jukka Lehtimäki, GKT, Senior Geophysicist<br />

Pertti Turunen, GTK, Senior Geophysicist<br />

Training:<br />

Reijo Salminen, GTK, Senior Advisor Geochemistry<br />

Jakobus Elsenbroek, CGS, Senior Geochemist<br />

Eliah Mulovhedzi, CGS, Geochemist<br />

In addition to GTK Consortium staff a number of geoscientists from the DGSM<br />

participated in field work as part of their on-the-job-training, as follows:<br />

In the lithostratigraphy verification (17.−25.3.<strong>2010</strong>): Zachary Baguma, Gabriel Data,<br />

Annet Tumwine, James Natukunda and Agnes Alaba-Kuterema.<br />

In mineral resources assessment: Vincent Kato and Gabriel Data.<br />

Geochemical soil sampling commenced March 15 th and is carried out by the DGSM<br />

team consisting of: Peter Turyasingura, Fred Kigereigu, Deus Muhwezi, Richard<br />

Kiggwe, Catherine Nyakecho and Marion Leku.<br />

During the reporting period DGSM provided drivers with good experience on roads<br />

and local conditions, such as Fred Kiwalabye, Godfrey Apuna, Richard Arnitwi,<br />

7


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

David Wizeye, Patrick Bugenya, Joseph Kayiwa, Wabbi Godfrey and Robert<br />

Nsereko.<br />

The Lithostratigraphical Scheme and the Geological Model for Uganda have been<br />

developed by a team of highly experienced senior geologists: Mr Matti Lehtonen, Dr.<br />

Phil Westerhof, Dr Tapio Koistinen and Dr Frik Hartzer (CGS). To support the<br />

modelling 17 age determinations were made and reported in “Radiometric Ages for<br />

Rock samples from Uganda, report 1 and 2” by Dr Irmeli Mänttäri dated 30.6.2009<br />

and 30.12.2009, respectively. Further age determinations are in process.<br />

The compilation of preliminary geological maps, based on all available geological<br />

data, remote sensing of satellite images and the airborne geophysical Blocks 1, 2, 2b,<br />

3, and 7 (Fig. 3), supported by limited field verification, was carried out by the GAF<br />

team (Dr Tobias Wever, Dr Bernd Schulte, Tilmann Jenett and Antje Lehmann). The<br />

preliminary geological maps were produced at scale 1:100k, 1:250k and 1:500k<br />

jointly by the GAF AG team and the GTK map production team (Ms Eira Kuosmanen<br />

and Ms Anneli Lindh). The interpretation of the airborne geophysics for the use of the<br />

Consortium for preparation of the preliminary geological maps and for field work was<br />

carried out by Dr Tapio Ruotoistenmäki (GTK).<br />

Fig. 3. The blocks for airborne geophysical surveys within the <strong>IDA</strong> project area.<br />

2. WORK CARRIED OUT<br />

The Project is implemented in three, partly overlapping phases: Phase I: Data<br />

gathering and preparation, Phase II: Geological synthesis, field work and compilation<br />

of draft maps, Phase III: Preparation of final products. Training is focused mainly in<br />

Phase II field work, although DGSM geologists have also been involved in data<br />

gathering from the archieves. The GIS environment has been implemented throughout<br />

the field mapping and map preparation: GPS, laptop computers, digital cameras etc.<br />

8


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

are used. ArcGIS (version 9.3), compatible with the GMIS, is used in the production<br />

of maps and databases. This will ensure that all collected data are consistent over the<br />

Project area and also with the NDF financed Uganda north.<br />

Data collection, evaluation and preparation was carried out within the first three<br />

months (October-December 2008), starting when the contract was signed (October 6 th ,<br />

2008). The interpretation of remote sensed data (satellite images and airborne<br />

geophysics) integrated with available geological maps was started when the Advance<br />

Payment was received by the GTK (1.12.2008). Airborne geophysics for Block 1 was<br />

received from DGSM in November 2008, and preliminary data for the remaining<br />

blocks (except the last Block 4) were received 16 th January, 2009. The corrected,<br />

levelled and merged complete airborne geophysical data were received from Fugro at<br />

the end of April 2009. After that the remote sensing interpretation of airborne<br />

geophysical blocks 1, 2, 2b, 3 and 7 (Fig. 3) could be carried out as one seamless map.<br />

This work resulted in a detailed follow up plan for field verification for the whole<br />

project area.<br />

Preliminary maps based on integrated remote sensing available geological map data<br />

and field verification of November 2008 were prepared for the whole project area and<br />

delivered to the Project Coordinator June 16 th 2009.<br />

The field verification of the preliminary geology of the <strong>IDA</strong> contract area started in<br />

the beginning of February 2009 and was completed by the end of November 2009.<br />

The geodynamic analyses and the lithological legend were verified in field during a<br />

two weeks long, joint excursion with DGSM geologists and the senior geological<br />

advisors of the Consultant in the second half of March <strong>2010</strong>. Compilation and drafting<br />

of the Draft Final Geological seamless map is ongoing in GTK Head office based on<br />

the established lithostratigraphy.<br />

2.1. GEOLOGICAL MAPPING<br />

During 2009 the field mapping covered the whole contract area, starting from the east<br />

in February and ending in the SW in November. A total of 7108 geological<br />

observations were made within <strong>IDA</strong> contract area and rock samples and digital photos<br />

taken on most of the localities. All the data is spatially correlated so that field forms,<br />

photos of outcrops and rock samples can be viewed in ArcGIS. The progress of the<br />

mapping and location of observation points are shown in Fig. 4.<br />

In total 176 thin sections and 105 whole rock chemical analyses have been made and<br />

more detailed study of the thin sections is on-going by polarization microscope and<br />

chemical data by petrological programs. In addition to the six magmatic rocks, dated<br />

by radiometric methods in GTK (see reports of Irmeli Mänttäri “Radiometric Ages for<br />

Rock Samples from Uganda”) four new samples have been delivered to the GTK<br />

laboratory.<br />

9


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 4. Progress of the field verification and distribution of geological observations made by GTK<br />

Consortium up to March 31 st , <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

New findings in southwestern Uganda in comparison to the published geological<br />

maps:<br />

Along the SE contact of the Mubende granite, there are locally up to 1−2 m<br />

wide zones with hematite rich rock which could be connected to the quartzhematite<br />

veins in the Buganda-Toro sedimentary rock formation between<br />

Mubende and Singo granite. Although not showing signs of mineralisation<br />

some representative quartz-vein samples from the Mubende-Singo area will be<br />

checked for Au. Magnetite and hematite has been located at Muhunga North<br />

(0243667E/0050879N), Kirongo East (0229181E/0066514N), Kibalinga<br />

(0308867E/0053837N, 0369741E/0071509N, 0278633E/0091105). Small<br />

quarries where 2−4 m wide magnetite/hematite layers in phyllite have<br />

occasionally been mined are found in Kadiera (0141434E/00501749N) and<br />

NW of Kabale (0830607E/9861701N).<br />

10


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Sulphide mineralization has rarely been encountered, and only few mafic<br />

(doleritic) dykes showed pyrite or pyrrhotite dissemination, e.g. at Mukukuru<br />

South (0246912E/0031827N) and Kirongo (0229128E/0066468N). Basic to<br />

ultrabasic rocks, especially those showing high magnetic susceptibility have<br />

been checked for base metals (Cr, Ni, Pt), with only marginally elevated<br />

levels.<br />

Mafic (-ultramafic) rocks occur in a geophysical anomaly NE of Fort Portal.<br />

They will be studied more detailed in terms of geophysics and geochemistry.<br />

Additionally a geological excursion of two weeks in the <strong>IDA</strong> area was made in March<br />

to clarify and unify the geology of southern Uganda. Several new rock samples were<br />

collected for radiometric age determinations, e.g., a new occurrence of alkaline rock<br />

in Bugiri will be studied. During the excursion, it came quite clear that Pan-African<br />

overprint also occurs in the Kiboga region.<br />

2.2. MINERAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT<br />

The known mineral resources in the project area have been checked in the field. A<br />

summary of findings covering the visited deposits which are considered to have<br />

potential for further studies were presented in the Annual Report. A number of sites,<br />

such as Lutembe granite, Kakiri granite, Butende clay, Buteraniro clay, Rwenkanga<br />

columbite-tantalite pegmatite, Muhokya lime works, Kakabara granite, Rugando<br />

limestone, Mashonga gold workings, Nyimo granite, Wankoba granite, Kiwugo<br />

granite, Muyenga granite and Muko olivine basalt were visited and will be described<br />

in the Draft Final Report when laboratory analyses of samples are available.<br />

2.2.1. Dimension stone<br />

Dimension stones are here dealt together with aggregate rocks because at this stage<br />

the existing aggregate quarries with their nearby surroundings offered an excellent<br />

starting point for an overall study on dimension stones.<br />

Lwemivubo aggregate quarry within the Mubende granite massive is situated some<br />

20 km west of the town of Mubende by the Fort Portal road.<br />

The rock is coarse grained, porphyric, post-orogenic granite. Reddish feldspar crystals<br />

(1−10 cm) have occasionally a form of ovoid, and have sometimes also a rim around<br />

like in rapakivi. Greenish groundmass is comprised of finer grained quartzplagioclase-<br />

hornblende- (biotite). Magnetite, often altered to hematite, is a common<br />

accessory mineral, with minor amounts of sulphides and fluorite.<br />

As aggregate material the rock fulfils the main technical requirements for all<br />

construction, even though the large grain size restricts the use as a highest quality<br />

product.<br />

In the quarry and near vicinity the rock is generally strongly fractured owing to heavy<br />

use of explosives for blasting.<br />

11


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

However, the basic jointing style is like that of granite (rapakivi), in which vertical<br />

and horizontal jointing is well developed. This is an important property for quarrying<br />

economically big dimension stone blocks.<br />

Fig. 5. The industrial mineral occurrences around Singo granite in Central Uganda.<br />

Also the general appearance of the rock; colour and texture, could generate interest<br />

within dimension stone entrepreneurs.<br />

Considering that the Mubende granite covers an area of over 3600 sq.km, it would be<br />

worthwhile to carry out a study to look for the best potential areas for quarrying.<br />

12


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 6. Typical porphyric Mubende granite, Lwemivubo quarry.<br />

Kiganda aggregate quarry within the Singo granite massive is located about 38 km E<br />

from Mubende town towards Mityana and some 2 km south of the main road.<br />

The rock is coarse grained, porphyric, post-orogenic granite. The colour varies from<br />

reddish to greyish, plagioclase is often a bit greenish, due to alteration into epidote?<br />

Mineral composition is much like that in Lwemivubo, but in places the amount of<br />

magnetite is quite high and fluorite was not observed.<br />

Compared to Lwemivubo the rock here is more variable in texture, colour and grain<br />

size and accordingly some types are very good as aggregate material.<br />

Considering Kiganda granite as dimension stone it looks obvious that in the quarry<br />

and nearby area the rock is more fractured by quarry blasts and also the style of<br />

jointing is more irregular, which makes the quarrying more difficult (and expensive).<br />

However, there occur rock types which may be interesting in their appearance. These<br />

could be quarried as smaller blocks providing slabs for special uses which in fact<br />

make a good proportion of all dimension stone business.<br />

These possibilities should also be clarified by studying different exposures in the<br />

surrounding areas.<br />

13


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 7. Coarse grained, porphyric Singo granite, Kiganda quarry.<br />

Mwezi aggregate quarry is located in the eastern end of Singo granite, some 80 km<br />

NW from Kampala towards Hoima, about 1,5 km southwest from the main road.<br />

The rock in here is also quite variable. The texture is porphyric and main colour is<br />

rather deep reddish, but greyish and greenish varieties also exist. The grain size is<br />

generally coarse, but in places especially grey varieties are medium (even fine?)<br />

grained and have very good properties as aggregate material.<br />

2.2.2. Kaolin pegmatites<br />

In this connection the topic is dealt with the deposits which have been visited and new<br />

information obtained in 2009. Previous studies and data are also described briefly to<br />

clarify the current status of various deposits. Other potential mineral commodities<br />

occurring in individual pegmatites are also considered.<br />

Buwambo pegmatite is located some 27 km from Kampala towards Masindi on the<br />

top of Namakonkomi hill, about 1 km east of the main road (Fig. 5). The pegmatite is<br />

hosted in Buganda-Toro rocks and is exposed in rather small area (100x50 m), but<br />

obviously it is somewhat larger.<br />

The pegmatite is strongly weathered (kaolinized) in its topmost part and at times it has<br />

been exploited in small scale for kaolin. At present the quarry is 60 m long, 20 m wide<br />

and 3-5 m deep. A few exploration pits have been excavated in the nearby area.<br />

14


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 8. Buwambo kaolinized pegmatite.<br />

Kaolinized parts of the deposit are soft, rather white in colour and composed mainly<br />

of mica (muscovite) and kaolinite with minor quartz and a little feldspar. In places the<br />

surface and fracture zones are stained red by Fe-hydroxides. In between the soft<br />

kaolinitc material there are hard, big portions composed mainly of quartz; typical to<br />

(complex) pegmatites.<br />

A few preliminary processing tests have been done of the whitish kaolinitic material<br />

and the results indicate that the product could fulfill the technical requirements as<br />

filler, extender or pigment applications for ceramics, paint, paper, rubber, plastics.<br />

It would be worthwhile to carry out further, detailed studies to find out the extent of<br />

kaolinized material and the content of kaolinite, then processing methods and<br />

technical properties of final product. Also the other minerals with potential as byproducts<br />

should be evaluated.<br />

On the Migade hill, about 2 km west from Buwambo, a same type of whitish,<br />

kaolinized pegmatite is exposed and also mined from two small quarries. The<br />

weathered material is not as white as in Buwambo.<br />

15


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 9. Location of the mineral resources in SW Uganda.<br />

Mutaka pegmatite is located 6 km to SSW from Kabira trading centre and an access<br />

from Ishaka on Mbarara- Kasese road is 16.6 km south to Kitagata and then 16 km<br />

west to Kabira.<br />

The deposit has been exploited at times since 1960 when beryl was discovered there.<br />

By 1968 Mutaka produced 270 tons beryl, 17 tons cassiterite and 5.5 tons columbitetantalite.<br />

Thereafter the operation ceased for years, only in late 1980s a small scale exploitation<br />

started again by Mutaka mining association. In 1991 Muhindo Enterprises applied the<br />

mining lease on the deposit and still holds it.<br />

In late 1991 DGSM was contracted to carry out an exploration programme on the<br />

deposit; geological mapping, pitting and sampling. Also the drilling of 8 holes, 410 m<br />

in total, by Kilembe Mines Ltd was included and completed in March 1992.<br />

Based on these studies the ore reserve calculation for kaolin was prepared by<br />

DGSM/Hadoto in 1993, giving proved reserves 300 557 tons and probable reserves<br />

538 623 tons. This calculation is based on the 30% kaolin (kaolinite) content in the<br />

ore.<br />

However, the above reports do not describe the type of samples and how the kaolin<br />

percentage was determined. This should be clearly specified because it is of essential<br />

importance in the reserve calculation.<br />

16


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 10. Mutaka pegmatite. The vegetated material on the wall and heaps on the bottom is quartz-rich<br />

waste after previous mining operations.<br />

Latest laboratory tests of Mutaka kaolin by GTK gave an average kaolinite content<br />

13.5% for 7 samples. These determinations also showed that in strongly weathered<br />

material of Mutaka deposit the main mineral is K-feldspar, with an average content of<br />

85.5% in 7 samples.<br />

It can also be noted that the K-feldspar is extremely pure, with very high K-content<br />

(up to 15%) and very low Fe2O3 (0.02–0.1%). This kind of high quality product could<br />

find special markets with special price if the production and marketing could be<br />

economically arranged.<br />

Preliminary tests on the quality of kaolin showed that the technical properties of the<br />

processed product would meet the requirements as filler, extender or pigment<br />

applications for ceramics, paper, paint, fiberglass, rubber and plastics industries.<br />

Considering the above it would be worthwhile to carry out additional studies on the<br />

Mutaka deposit to find out its real potential for various industrial applications.<br />

Nyabushenyi pegmatite is located some 10 km from Ntungamo towards Kabale and<br />

ca 3 km to NNW from the main road.<br />

The deposit is hosted in the Karagwe-Ankolean rocks like tens of other pegmatites in<br />

southwest Uganda.<br />

The deposit was mined from early 1960s until mid 1970s by the Uganda Mining<br />

company.<br />

A total of 270 tons of beryl, which was the main product, was produced, amblygonite<br />

and columbite-tantalite were by-products. It has been estimated that probable beryl<br />

reserves to 50 m depth would lie between 4800–6300 tons.<br />

No estimates on amblygonite and other minerals have been given.<br />

The Nyabushenyi pegmatite is supposed to be quite extensive, over 500 m long and<br />

over 100 m wide, but it is poorly exposed. The main minerals are quartz, feldspars<br />

17


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

and mica. In exposed parts and quarries the rock is weathered (kaolinized) in places,<br />

but strongly kaolinized parts form only small, irregular lenses. Accordingly there is<br />

not enough of quality kaolin even for semi-industrial exploitation.<br />

However, considering the above given estimate some additional work might be<br />

worthwhile.<br />

Moni kaolin deposit is situated on the eastern suburbs of Mbale town about 40 km<br />

north from Tororo, in SE Uganda.<br />

The rock is a coarse grained pegmatite granite which is partly kaolinized. Feldspar,<br />

quartz, kaolinite and muscovite are the main minerals, besides there is a lot of<br />

secondary Fe-hydroxide staining in fractures, cavities and on the quarry wall.<br />

The kaolinite content is not more than 15–20% at maximum.<br />

Fig. 11. Moni kaolin in Mbale. The brown staining colours only the surface.<br />

There is a quarry, some 150 m long in N-S direction and 20–30 m wide, the depth is<br />

up to 5 m. The eastern wall ends in a weathered, greenish mica schist.<br />

Kaolinised material is quarried by a local enterprise and transported to Tororo Cement<br />

for an Al-additive in clinker production.<br />

2.2.3. Vermiculite<br />

Namekara vermiculite deposit is located in Manafwa District, SE Uganda, on the<br />

eastern side of Tororo- Mbale road. The vermiculite prospect occurs on the southwestern<br />

margin of the Bukusu Carbonatite Complex where the vermiculite formation<br />

was developed at the contact between the mica-rich pyroxenites and carbonatite.<br />

First time Namekara vermiculite was investigated by pitting and drilling in 1950s in<br />

conjunction with British and Ugandan Geological Surveys. Small scale exploitation in<br />

18


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

late 1950s proved uneconomic. In 1988 van Straaten recorded that both the cation<br />

exchange capacity and the exchangeable Mg content of vermiculite are good.<br />

Later CRL, a Ugandan subsidiary of Canadian IBI Corporation investigated the<br />

potential of high grade vermiculite at Namekara by trenching (17) and by diamond<br />

drilling (12 holes in total 490 m). Based on the results of these investigations a<br />

processing plant was installed in 2001.<br />

Fig. 12. Namekara pit, vermiculite (light) at the center, below dark brown soil.<br />

Between 2002 and 2006 a total of 16 000 tonnes of mainly medium grade vermiculite<br />

was exported, while a small tonnage was exfoliated on site and sold on local market<br />

as a soil conditioner and insulation material for fuel efficient stoves.<br />

Thereafter Rio Tinto bought the prospect and carried out an extensive RC drilling<br />

programme of 72 holes, in total 3490 m as well as comprehensive laboratory testing at<br />

Rio Tinto laboratories in France, at PMC in RSA and at Palabora Mining Company in<br />

RSA.<br />

Due to serious financial difficulties Rio Tinto IM Division sold the prospect in late<br />

2009 to Gulf Resources from Australia.<br />

Before buying the prospect Gulf Resources contracted SRK Consulting from RSA to<br />

review the Exploration work and Mineral Resource estimate of Namekara which Rio<br />

Tinto completed on the vermiculite potential of Mining License area and on<br />

Exploration License areas in the vicinity of Namekara.<br />

In their report SRK Consultants conclude that the mineral resources in Inferred<br />

category for the Namekara Prospect are altogether 54.9 Mt at 15% cut-off of 180_V<br />

quality vermiculite. Of the total 26.7% is of 180_V and 18.8% of 425_V quality.<br />

Considering the above figures it is clear that the vermiculite reserves in Namekara are<br />

large enough and obviously also the quality fulfils the requirements for a major<br />

operation. The question is how to enter the world market where the competition in<br />

vermiculite business in tough.<br />

19


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

2.2.4. Bentonite<br />

Two bentonite occurrences were visited in Rukungiri District; Burama and Ntungwa.<br />

The Burama deposit has been recently investigated by DGSM (Kato, 2008). In the<br />

investigated 1.7 ha area, the bentonite occurs in 3-4 m thick layer, totaling 115 000 t.<br />

A study in GTK laboratory confirmed that smectite (bentonite) is the main mineral,<br />

other identified minerals in a sample were kaolinite and quartz. EDX-spectrum<br />

indicates that the clay is mainly Ca-bentonite, but there is also Na in the lattice of<br />

bentonite.<br />

Fig. 13. Ntungwa bentonite and Mr. Prosper Ndabahika, License holder.<br />

In Ntungwa the bentonite is exposed in valley walls dissected by River Ntungwa<br />

(Birira). The bentonite layer, thickness so far unknown, is covered by about 10 m<br />

thick <strong>Quarter</strong>nary (?) sand and gravel overburden. A preliminary study in GTK<br />

laboratory confirmed that the main mineral is smectite (montmorillonite), with minor<br />

quartz, K-feldspar, analcime and kaolinite. This sample was from the eastern side of<br />

the river. A sample from the opposite side of the river was clearly more sandy. GTK’s<br />

XRD-study indicated that the smectite content of this sample was much smaller than<br />

in the previous sample. Here the main mineral was quartz, the second smectite and<br />

others kaolinite, analcime, muscovite and K-feldspar.<br />

These two occurrences represent separate deposits, because they are 8 km apart from<br />

each other. Before these findings no bentonite deposits were known to exist in<br />

Uganda.<br />

2.2.5. Carbonate rocks and other cement raw materials<br />

The main use for carbonate rocks in Uganda is for cement manufacturing, accordingly<br />

the demand is for a Mg-poor, low alkali and low phosphorus marble or limestone. The<br />

magnesia (MgO) content in clinker should not exceed 3% and P2O5 should be less<br />

than 1%. If the cement company’s main carbonate rock source has too high contents<br />

of MgO or P2O5, the problem can be solved by mixing it with better quality carbonate<br />

20


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

rock. This is what is currently being done in Tororo. The main source is the sovite of<br />

Lime Kiln Hill (Tororo carbonatite center, Fig 14) and the admixture marble is<br />

quarried from Moroto (Katikekile), at a distance of 280 km.<br />

The Tororo Cement Ltd is at present upgrading the production and in <strong>2010</strong> the cement<br />

production will be 500 000 tons and possibly 1 Mt in 2012. The latter figure means<br />

that the annual demand of a good quality limestone is 1.5–1.7 Mt.<br />

The other cement plant in Uganda is located in Hima and it is a subsidiary of<br />

Bamburi Cement and a part of Lafarge East Africa. When the ongoing expansion<br />

there is completed, the annual production capacity will be 830 000 t and the demand<br />

of limestone 1.3–1.5 Mtpa. The current source is the lacustrine limestone exposed<br />

nearby the plant (Fig.16). The deposit consists of two limestone layers, both about 5<br />

m thick and separated by a 5 m thick clay bed. So far only the topmost bed has been<br />

exploited. The future reserves in the Dura limestone are according to the Company’s<br />

commercial manager for 20 years’ exploitation.<br />

Logistically the exploitation of Dura limestone is problematic; the shortest distance<br />

between Hima and Dura is less than 20 km, but in practice the distance is much longer<br />

because the 150 km transport route will be Dura-Kamwenge-Fort Portal-Hima, unless<br />

the old railway connection will be re-opened.<br />

In brief, in an ideal case the bulk raw material resources of cement manufacturing,<br />

limestone and clay, should be available close to the plant. Unfortunately that is not the<br />

case in Uganda. Long transport distances of low-value bulk materials raise the cost of<br />

the final product. In consequence large, good quality limestone resources, relatively<br />

close to the cement plants are in urgent demand, and accordingly serious<br />

investigations to discover or/and confirm these should be carried out, especially in<br />

Tororo area.<br />

Fig. 14. A part of Lime Kiln Hill open pit, in the background Cave Hill (left) and Reservoir Hill.<br />

21


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig.15. Mineral occurrences located close to the Kenyan border.<br />

Fig. 16. A part of Hima Cement limestone pit. In the background old quarry face and reforested pit<br />

bottom.<br />

22


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

2.2.6. Other raw materials of cement<br />

Another basic raw material in cement manufacturing is clay, as a source for alumina.<br />

Generally the common clay is good enough, but for chemical adjusting both of the<br />

Ugandan cement companies use also kaolin, Tororo Cement from a pit close to Mbale<br />

and Hima Cement from Bushenyi.<br />

Gypsum, CaSO4·2H2O, is needed about 5% in cement manufacturing. At the moment<br />

both companies import the gypsum, Tororo from Oman and Hima from Kenya. Large,<br />

but low grade deposit occurs in Kibuku, Bundibugyo District (Kabagambe-Kaliisa<br />

1977). Bundibugyo Miners Association has previously excavated and processed small<br />

amounts of gypsum with primitive methods, 100–300 tpa and sold it to Hima Cement.<br />

At present this has ceased. The annual gypsum consumption of Hima Cement will be<br />

about 40 000 tons when the plant works to capacity after the enlargement.<br />

It would be worthwhile to find out the potential of the Kibuku deposit by carrying out<br />

proper processing tests to achieve a pure gypsum concentrate. Previously this was not<br />

the case.<br />

2.2.7. Tin and tungsten<br />

The Mwerasandu cassiterite and Nyamuliro tungsten deposits were visited in<br />

November 2009. The geological setting of these deposits are genetically related to<br />

numerous small bodies of granites, pegmatitic granites and pegmatites intruded into<br />

the Kibaran belt between 1000 and 900 Ma. These G4 granites are the source of<br />

Kibaran (Karagwe-Ankolean) tin and tungsten mineralization.<br />

Tin mining in Uganda started about 80 yrs ago, in 1927 and in 1927–1960 almost 10<br />

000 tons of tin concentrate was exported. Good years for tin mining were also in<br />

1960s and 1970s when the world tin prices were high.<br />

In Mwerasandu (Fig.17) the tin occurs in quartz-muscovite veins and it is still left in<br />

old tailing heaps. Besides these not much is to be seen on the surface about old mining<br />

activities, except some old adits and shafts. Several artisanal teams are still working in<br />

the area, some with the tailings and most inside the tunnels. The men interviewed<br />

estimated that about 300 people are working at the deposit.<br />

23


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 17. Mwerasandu tin deposit. Coarse tailings and (in the center) an adit to shaft entrance, still in<br />

active use.<br />

One kg of cassiterite concentrate fetches 7000–8000 UGX. The LME metal price<br />

during the previous year has been about 12–18 USD/kg; taken account of impurities<br />

in concentrate, the value of contained tin is about 7–10 USD/kg. According to USGS,<br />

no production figures for tin exist after 2004, when the estimated production was 2<br />

tons (tin content).<br />

In southwestern Uganda tungsten mineralization occur for the most part as<br />

mineralized quartz veins intruded in Kibaran sediments, some smaller occurrences<br />

confined to Singo granite has also been mined in 1940s.<br />

In Krone (U) Ltd’s Nyamuliro (Bjordal mine) tungsten occurs as ferberite, which is an<br />

iron rich member of the wolframite group. The veins are preferentially emplaced into<br />

cleavage planes cutting the bedding. The actual country rocks are anomalously<br />

graphite containing horizons in phyllites. At present all the work from mining to<br />

concentrating is done manually by work force of about 50 men (Fig. 18). Daily<br />

production rates are rather variable, 150–800 kg/d. The annual production in Uganda<br />

during the last few years has been some 45–94 tons.<br />

24


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Fig. 18. Nyamuliro mine, manual enrichment of the tungsten ore.<br />

2.2.8. Field visits during the reporting period<br />

Kaolin from the Kibalya hill in Bushenyi district is mined mainly for aluminium<br />

additive in cement production at Hima. The transport distance is about 135 km. The<br />

elevation difference between the hill top, where the kaolin mining takes place, and the<br />

surrounding lowland is 230 m and the track is rather demanding, both for vehicles and<br />

drivers.<br />

Fig. 19. A part of Kibalya Hill kaolin quarry, Bushenyi District.<br />

The Kibalya kaolin is derived from Karagwe-Ankolean siltstones/schists by regional<br />

weathering. The colour is rather white, except local pinkish coloration by<br />

iron/manganese minerals. This kind of mineralization is a typical weathering result of<br />

K-A System siltstones/schists, which can be observed in many road cuts in SW-<br />

Uganda. The demand of kaolin by Hima Cement Ltd is currently three truckloads in a<br />

25


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

week. Samples were collected for laboratory tests. The kaolinised area extends more<br />

than 1 km in length and the depth exceeds 50 m.<br />

The kaolin of the Koki deposit in Rakai District resembles that of Kibalya, however<br />

the quartz content is clearly higher making the material more compact than in<br />

Kibalya. Also the iron and manganese contents are higher, which is seen in stronger<br />

pink coloration. Samples were taken for laboratory tests.<br />

Fig. 20. Original structure retained in Koki kaolin, Rakai District<br />

A large, old aggregate quarry was visited near Ntungamo. The rock is granitic, only<br />

slightly foliated and porphyric. The form of aggregate particles are near-cubic. Good<br />

aggregate rock.<br />

The new airborne geophysical survey brought up three roundish magnetic anomalies<br />

to the east of the Bugiri town. Experts of some prospecting companies have<br />

interpreted those as possible buried carbonatites. Much of the anomalies are covered<br />

by wetlands or they are flat areas. The anomalies have been visited by the Consortium<br />

teams and only one outcrop was discovered. The rock in there was massive<br />

anorthositic gabbro, possibly with cryptic layering. Therefore more studies should be<br />

carried out to find out the actual nature of these anomalies.<br />

The interest for the REEs (rare earth elements) is increasing worldwide, especially<br />

after China´s announcement to cut threir REE exports to protect their own high tech<br />

industry. The carbonatites and alkaline complexes are the most potential host rocks<br />

for the REEs, In carbonatites also the surrounding alkaline haloes (fenites) are<br />

potential source rocks. A reconnaissance sampling to test their REE potential was<br />

carried out at Sukulu and Bukusu complexes. Samples were collected both from<br />

carbonatites and their fenite haloes.<br />

26


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

References used:<br />

Kato, V. and Namboyera, A. 2008. Draft bentonite assessment report. Burama,<br />

Rukungiri District, Sheet 84/2. Unpublished report. DGSM.<br />

Kabagambe-Kaliisa, F. 1977. A detailed geological mapping of the area covered by<br />

the Kibuku gypsum project. Report No FAKK/4. DGSM.<br />

2.3. MAP PRODUCTION<br />

The Preliminary geological maps, 36 maps at scale 1:100 000 and 7 maps at 1:250<br />

000 scale have been delivered to the SMMRP in June 16 th 2009. They have<br />

continuously been updated using the information captured in the field. Interpretation<br />

is being verified and formation contacts (polygons) modified accordingly. The<br />

Lithostratigraphic Legend has been verified in the field by DGSM geologists and the<br />

senior geological advisors of the consultant during two weeks in March <strong>2010</strong>. The<br />

drafting of the Draft Final map and Legend is in progress. The geological and mineral<br />

resources maps will be presented for evaluation in the end of June <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

A final layout for the maps was discussed with the SMMRP August 24 th 2009 and a<br />

test map was produced in 100 000 scale and given to SMMRP for final comments in<br />

September 9 th 2009. This layout will be used for the Draft Final geological maps. The<br />

names for the 100 000 map sheets were presented for approval to SMMRP.<br />

Thematic geophysical maps, as specified in the contract, were presented to SMMRP<br />

staff September 16 th 2009.<br />

Additional radiometric maps to support target selection for field work have been<br />

produced, including processed uranium, thorium and potassium maps, to highlight<br />

uranium ore potential targets.<br />

2.4. TRAINING<br />

Formal training courses in the project have been completed and are described as<br />

follows:<br />

During May 18 th to 29 th 2009 a training course in Geochemical Surveys was given by<br />

Dr Reijo Salminen (GTK), Jakobus Elsenbroek (CGS) and Robert Netshitungulwana<br />

(CGD) to 12 trainees. During the first week theory behind using geochemistry in<br />

geological mapping and exploration was presented and the second week was spent in<br />

practical sampling in the field in Mityana-Mubende area. The training activity has<br />

been reported in a separate report. An orientation geochemical survey was carried out<br />

during the second week of the training. The results and recommendations have been<br />

summarized in a “Geochemical Orientation Study” -report that was delivered to<br />

SMMRP Project Coordinator September 16 th , 2009.<br />

During June 1 st to 12 th 2009 a training course in Geological Mapping I was given to<br />

14 trainees by Dr Tsehaie Woldai (ITC) and Dr Andreas Schumann (GAF). During<br />

the first week lectures and exercises were given and during the second week<br />

geological mapping was carried out in Jinja area. A separate training report describes<br />

the details.<br />

27


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

During August 31 st to September 11 th 2009 a training course in Data Base<br />

Management in geological mapping was given Drs Frank van Ruitenbeek and John<br />

Carranza (ITC) to 18 trainees. This formal course with special emphasis in remote<br />

sensing data has also been reported separately including an evaluation of the<br />

participants.<br />

The course “Geological Mapping II”, held by Dr Tsehaie Woldai (ITC) and Dr<br />

Kerstin Saalmann (GTK) November 2 nd to 13 th 2009, focused on remote sensing<br />

interpretation of Kiboga area and on structural elements in geological mapping in<br />

general. After the theory, the map interpretations were verified in the field and<br />

geological line structures were measured where visible in Buganda-Toro sediments.<br />

This exercise resulted in each group producing a geological map which was presented<br />

and discussed during the last day of the course.<br />

A Mineral Resources Assessment (MRA) course started September 28 th 2009 with<br />

mineral prospectivity training given by Dr. John Carranza of ITC and continued until<br />

October 1 st with presentations by Yrjö Pekkala (GTK) covering “Overview of<br />

Industrial Minerals” and “The economic importance and versatility of Industrial<br />

Minerals”. The assessment of Dimension stone and Rock Aggregate resources was<br />

presented by Paavo Härmä (GTK). The prepared lectures by Tapio Kuivasaari and<br />

Tapio Lehto were postponed due to sudden illness and loss of family member,<br />

respectively. Instead, the lectures “Industrial Minerals Prospecting” and “Cement Raw<br />

Materials” by Tapio Kuivasaari and “Gold Resources Assessment” by Tapio Lehto<br />

were given on Monday, November 30 th 2009.<br />

For practical mineral resources assessment training, the kaolinized pegmatite at<br />

Buwambo, some 26 km north of Kampala, along the road to Luwero, was mapped by<br />

the trainees. The geologists were divided in three groups and each made an evaluation<br />

of the deposit. Its size was measured and quality evaluated. Kaolin and quartz were<br />

recognized as valuable minerals. Kaolin can be separated by wet screening. Quartz<br />

forms the major part of the coarse materials. Other minerals with economic value,<br />

such as Li minerals, were tentatively identified.<br />

The newly opened exploration trenches at Kamalenge Gold Prospect, near Mityana,<br />

were utilized for practical field training in mineral assessment during November 23 rd<br />

to 26 th 2009. The objective was to utilize the Singo and Mubende granites with their<br />

known mineralisations in training. Kamalenge (36N 0362346/0072894) has gold both<br />

in river valley gravel and as primary mineralisation within shear zone related quartzhematite<br />

veins, stringers and stockwork in Buganda-Toro shales and sandstones. The<br />

development work by the mining company AUC on the gold mineralised sandstone<br />

provides good targets for more detailed field work by various disciplines (geology,<br />

geophysics and geochemistry).<br />

On regional scale the Buganda-Toro sediment formation between the Mubende and<br />

Singo granite batholiths is distinct on airborne geophysical surveys. WNW-ESE<br />

trending weakness zones are cut by NE-SW trending fractures, possibly providing<br />

passage for gold bearing fluids. The EM survey of Block EM2b indicates some E-W<br />

trending conductors in connection to magnetic structures that are recommended for<br />

more detailed exploration.<br />

The Mubende granite was studied in an old aggregate quarry, ca 20 km west from the<br />

town of Mubende, along the road to Fort Portal. The team’s interest was targeted<br />

mainly for its potential as a dimension stone for construction. The granite was found<br />

28


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

to be esthetically appealing with coarse, rapakivi type texture, epidotized plagioclase<br />

giving a greenish tint. However, dense jointing at the aggregate quarry would not<br />

allow for frame saw size of large blocks. Instead, circular saw size blocks, for tiles<br />

and smaller size slabs could be produced.<br />

The possible uses of the Singo granite were studied in an aggregate quarry ca 40 km E<br />

of Mubende, close to the village of Kiganda. The granite is medium grained, colour<br />

varying from light to greenish and reddish, classified as “appealing”. Jointing makes it<br />

difficult to produce large blocks, but for slabs and smaller blocks the jointing was<br />

considered positive.<br />

A course on Geophysical Ground Surveys was given by Dr Tapio Ruotoistenmäki and<br />

Jukka Lehtimäki (GTK) during November 30th to December 11 th 2009. First two days<br />

were used to check the equipment in the DGSM and to discuss the theories behind<br />

geophysical exploration methods. Practical geophysical survey, using gravimetry,<br />

magnetics and IP, was carried out along a traverse intersecting the possible extensions<br />

of the gold bearing structures in the Kamalenge gold prospect near Mityana. A<br />

separate report has been delivered to SMMRP in March <strong>2010</strong>. In Kamalenge there are<br />

geochemical indications of gold and sulphide minerals in soil that may indicate that<br />

the gold could originally be connected to sulphides and then provide a target that can<br />

be followed by ground geophysics.<br />

In addition to the formal courses, additional information was given by the GTK<br />

Consortium team members. Ms Eira Kuosmanen, GIS geologist responsible for GTK<br />

map production, gave a presentation “Introduction to ArcGIS” during one day (3.8).<br />

Close to 30 persons, most of them from DGSM attended the seminar. The progress of<br />

the field mapping was discussed July 27 th in the DGSM Boardroom, when Hannu<br />

Mäkitie, Tuomo Manninen, Gerrit de Kock and Steven Boger presented their mapping<br />

results for about 20 persons from DGSM during a day. DGSM was briefed on<br />

mapping progress in February and in March <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

3. UPDATED WORK PLAN<br />

All tasks within the consecutive phases (I, II and III) of the Project are briefly<br />

described below, thereby identifying activities and products. The remotely sensed<br />

geological interpretation model is upgraded with new geological information provided<br />

by field verification and laboratory studies. The first set of the Draft Final Geological<br />

maps (upgraded preliminary maps) together with draft Final Geological Report will be<br />

submitted to the Employer before the start of final map production.<br />

Final Products – the production of final geological, geochemical, geophysical and<br />

mineral deposit maps will start as soon as the draft final map products have been<br />

accepted by the Employer. The seamless geological and mineral resources map data<br />

will be presented as 1:250 000 and 1:100 000 scale maps. High resolution geophysical<br />

airborne data combined with field mapping will enable the production of selected 1:50<br />

000 scale maps from areas with high mineral potential.<br />

The Action plan on Gantt Chart (App.1) is updated in <strong>Quarter</strong>ly and Annual Reports<br />

showing the overall progress of the Project.<br />

29


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

3.1. PHASE I: DATA GATHERING AND PREPARATION<br />

The collection, examination, processing and filing of all documents and data, such as:<br />

topographic maps, satellite imagery, existing geological maps, publications and<br />

reports and other useful and relevant documents, have been completed.<br />

3.1.1. Collection of data<br />

Digital topographic maps have been used as basis for the various map products. All<br />

received digital and paper map data has been transformed to ArcGis compatible<br />

format and arranged as separate layers in the Digital Map Library (DML) established<br />

by GTK.<br />

The spatial accuracy of the maps has been evaluated and has in places been improved,<br />

by taking new GPS-control points during field work and improving transformation<br />

formulas. The topographic data from the National Forest Authority (NFA), combined<br />

with Digital Terrain Data from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), with a<br />

resolution of 90 meters, has been used as base data for the new integrated geological<br />

maps.<br />

Activities:<br />

Topographic data, scale 1:250k, 1:100k and 1:50k in digital format has<br />

been collected.<br />

All digital topographic maps used by the Project have been geo-referenced,<br />

transformed to ArcGIS format and converted to the datum and projection<br />

of the final products and stored in the DML.<br />

Products:<br />

All topographic data have been stored in appropriate format in the DML<br />

and are available for ArcGIS map production.<br />

3.1.2. Processing of satellite images<br />

Interpretation of digital Landsat ETM and ASTER imagery data has been carried out.<br />

Computer interpretation on-screen has the advantage of contrast enhancement and<br />

availability of several image processing techniques. The remote sensed and processed<br />

data are available for the field survey teams in their laptops and, when needed, as hard<br />

copies.<br />

Activities:<br />

Unprocessed satellite imagery (Landsat ETM, in digital format) and<br />

selected ASTER images have been acquired for the Project area.<br />

Satellite imagery has been examined qualitatively.<br />

The Landsat ETM scenes have been haze corrected and de-striped where<br />

necessary.<br />

The Landsat ETM scenes have been geometrically corrected and georeferenced<br />

on UTM projection (WGS 84) and have in places been checked<br />

on the basis of GPS ground control points.<br />

30


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Interpreted satellite image data has been integrated with Digital Elevation<br />

Model (DEM) from SRTM and with major topographic features (towns,<br />

villages, roads) from topographic maps.<br />

Products:<br />

Digital coverage of geo-referenced Landsat ETM images and multispectral<br />

(false) colour ’fused images’ enhanced for the discrimination of<br />

lithological and structural features.<br />

3.1.3. Geochemical data<br />

The GTK Consortium continues carrying out an inventory of all available relevant<br />

geochemical data and creating a geochemical database for the Project area. The<br />

available geochemical maps are being scanned, geo-referenced, classified, integrated<br />

and interpreted. The map data will be stored in ArcGIS format thus being compatible<br />

with the GMIS.<br />

A total of 267 soil samples provided by the UNDP survey have been sieved and sent<br />

to CGS laboratory in Pretoria for multielement and gold analyses.<br />

Activities:<br />

All geochemical data, maps and analytical tables, made available to the<br />

Service Provider, are being collected, scanned, geo-referenced and stored<br />

in the DML.<br />

A meta-database for geochemical information has been created with<br />

adjoining maps showing the distribution and other parameters of older<br />

surveys.<br />

Geochemical maps shall be produced as defined in the contract and<br />

analytical results will be organized in ArcGIS, compatible with the GMIS.<br />

Products:<br />

Meta-database for geochemical surveys in the Project area done.<br />

Target selection for field follow up has been done, based on previous<br />

geochemical surveys in the country and an action plan made.<br />

3.1.4. Geophysical data<br />

A high-resolution airborne geophysical survey has been conducted in a number of<br />

Blocks in the southern parts of Uganda (Fig. 3), approximately coinciding with the<br />

area to be mapped in this Project. The data files have been received (preliminary in<br />

January 16 th , 2009, semi final March 18 th , 2009 and the corrected, levelled and<br />

merged data end of April 2009). All the blocks have been processed and used in<br />

preparation of the preliminary geological maps and for selecting areas of special<br />

interest for field verification. Targets have been selected for follow-up.<br />

Activities:<br />

All geophysical data, made available to the Service Provider by the<br />

Employer, has been collected and relevant data filed in the DML.<br />

31


Products:<br />

GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Regional coverage and quality of the airborne geophysical data has been<br />

evaluated to assess the usability of the data in geological interpretation of<br />

the mapping areas.<br />

Gridding of airborne geophysical down-line data and conversion of<br />

existing grids to Geosoft-format has been completed.<br />

Airborne geophysical maps have been produced to support the mapping.<br />

Thematic geophysical maps in scale 1:500 000 have been delivered to the<br />

SMMRP September 16 th 2009.<br />

Target selection for ground geophysical follow up has been made.<br />

3.1.5. Geological and Mineral Resources data<br />

Existing geological and mineral resource data in the archives of the DGSM has been<br />

collected and evaluated. The accumulated data has been organized in the DML,<br />

compatible with ArcGIS and attached with other digital, similarly geo-referenced<br />

datasets and geological maps.<br />

After a reconnaissance mapping in November 2008, the mapping of the contract area<br />

was implemented during 2009 (March−November).<br />

Activities:<br />

Existing geological maps and mineral resource information relevant to the<br />

Project area have been collected, evaluated and filed in digital format or as<br />

hard copy.<br />

Available geological maps (digital or hard copy) from the bordering areas<br />

of neighbouring countries have been collected and filed.<br />

Relevant geological, geochemical and geophysical maps have been<br />

scanned.<br />

Relevant reports, geology, mineral deposits, activity reports by companies<br />

to the Mines Department and other exploration results reported by the<br />

companies have been studied.<br />

Relevant scanned geological map material has been digitized.<br />

Products:<br />

Meta-database for all relevant geological map products compiled.<br />

Database of existing geological maps in the Project area in ArcGIS format<br />

made.<br />

Collection of all available geological maps relevant to the project area<br />

done.<br />

3.2. PHASE II: GEOLOGICAL SYNTHESIS, FIELD WORK AND<br />

COMPILATION OF MAPS<br />

The main objective of this phase is to produce draft final geological, geochemical,<br />

geophysical and mineral resource maps.<br />

32


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

3.2.1. Interpretation of satellite imagery<br />

Geological interpretation has been carried out based on existing geological<br />

information, geo-referenced Landsat ETM imagery, selected ASTER scenes and radar<br />

imagery. To highlight structural features such as faults, foliation, fold axes, dips and<br />

strikes of bedding planes, spatial and frequency domain filtering has been applied.<br />

With modern GIS and Image Processing-tools, like ER-Mapper and ArcGIS, the<br />

enhancement of satellite images/geophysical raster maps the geological interpretation<br />

is carried out as an interactive process during all stages of map compilation.<br />

Activities:<br />

Contrast enhancement to further optimize the image contrast for the<br />

benefit of discrimination of lithological units and structures has been<br />

carried out.<br />

Products:<br />

Geological and structural interpretations of the satellite images done.<br />

Outcrop prediction maps to assist quick field verification and mineral<br />

resources assessment utilized.<br />

3.2.2. Geochemical surveys<br />

Based on compilation of existing geochemical, geological, geophysical and mineral<br />

occurrence data, a program for follow-up geochemical surveys has been planned and<br />

will be carried out in selected high prospectivity areas as agreed with DGSM.<br />

An orientation survey was carried out during May, 2009 to define the basic<br />

parameters (sample depth, sample spacing, type of sample, etc.) for new surveys and<br />

to contribute to the preparation of a Geochemical Field Manual. The report<br />

“Geochemical Orientation Study” was delivered to Project Coordinator September<br />

16 th 2009.<br />

In areas with sufficient sample density and reliable analytical results, the<br />

geochemistry may be presented in 1:50k scale map sheets. In other areas the 1:250k<br />

and 1:100k scale maps will illustrate high-potential exploration targets.<br />

Activities:<br />

Orientation geochemical survey has been carried out and reported.<br />

A draft manual for field work and sample preparation has been produced.<br />

A comprehensive sampling program and procedure to produce a<br />

geochemical map of the project area at scale 1:250k and recommendations<br />

for necessary equipment and tools for effective and sustainable<br />

geochemical work within the DGSM will be proposed.<br />

Follow up geochemical surveys have been planned in selected, prospective<br />

areas. The implementation by the DGSM staff under supervision by GTK<br />

Consortium geochemists (Mikael Eklund and Robert Netshitungulwana)<br />

has commenced in March <strong>2010</strong> around the gold potential Singo granite in<br />

Mityana. To the end of March <strong>2010</strong> a total of 444 new soil samples were<br />

collected in the Singo granite target. During the geochemical target<br />

oriented surveys about 250 soil samples are planned to be collected from<br />

each target.<br />

33


Products:<br />

GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Manual for geochemical field- and sample preparation work, based on<br />

investigations in pilot areas is being updated.<br />

Target oriented sampling programme has been designed for the project<br />

area.<br />

New geochemical surveys will be reported in ArcGIS data format and as<br />

hard copy maps.<br />

3.2.3. Geophysical surveys<br />

Enhanced digital images form the basis for efficient use of airborne<br />

geophysics in geological mapping.<br />

Activities:<br />

Enhancement of the geological features by filtering, colour draping and<br />

enhancing the image from Blocks 1, 2, 2B, 3 and 7 (Fig. 3) has been<br />

completed.<br />

The collection of petrophysical parameters (susceptibility, density) of<br />

representative rock types started already during the reconnaissance survey<br />

in November 2008 and still continues. The parameters are measured in<br />

Entebbe when the rock samples are being organised prior to hand-over to<br />

DGSM.<br />

Modelling of structural elements (e.g., lineaments, folds, faults and<br />

fractures) has been executed using the local parameters of the magnetic<br />

field (direction and amplitude).<br />

Enhanced magnetic and radiometric images have been combined with<br />

satellite images and existing geological data sets (integrated images).<br />

Combinations of maps and their derivatives have been selected to optimize<br />

the interpretation of the geology in the project area.<br />

Lithological and structural interpretation of the airborne geophysical data<br />

together with radiometric data has been carried out.<br />

Modelling the structure for selected cross-sections has been done.<br />

Geological modelling of the geophysical interpretations has been carried<br />

out.<br />

Target selection and ground geophysical exploration program has been<br />

designed.<br />

Products:<br />

Regular grids (in Geosoft format) of airborne magnetic and radiometric<br />

surveys, done.<br />

Petrophysical database of major rock types in the mapping area, ongoing.<br />

Thematic maps of geophysical images combined with other data sets have<br />

been delivered to the Project Coordinator September 16 th 2009.<br />

Geological (lithological) and structural interpretation maps, done.<br />

Geophysical interpretation of selected anomalies and cross-sections, done.<br />

Target selection and ground geophysical follow-up programme compiled.<br />

Field work has commenced.<br />

34


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

3.2.4. Compilation of preliminary geological and mineral resources maps<br />

The major part of activities described previously aim to enable the successful<br />

completion of this task. In this report geological maps produced by remote sensing<br />

only are called Preliminary maps and maps checked and verified in the field are called<br />

Draft Final Maps.<br />

Activities:<br />

Integration of the existing geological and structural maps with other<br />

relevant data sets for geological interpretations has been completed for the<br />

whole project area.<br />

Revision of the geological maps by utilizing satellite images, geophysical<br />

data and other data stored in the DML, done.<br />

Identification of key areas that are considered as potential targets for<br />

mapping traverses, and for other selected studies, done<br />

Preliminary litho-stratigraphic division in major units and sub-units of<br />

lower rank of the Project area has been created.<br />

Interpretation of geological structures in the integrated images, done.<br />

ArcGIS files, including geology (rock types), litho-stratigraphic division<br />

and structural features as separate map layers produced.<br />

Preliminary geological and mineral resources map data prepared and<br />

reported.<br />

Products:<br />

Combined preliminary geological and mineral resources maps and hard<br />

copies for evaluation and acceptance by the Project Supervisor were<br />

delivered to SMMRP June 16 th , 2009.<br />

Mineral resources data collected from documents and files (Survey and<br />

Mines Departments) are being compiled into the Mineral Occurrence<br />

Database. The database includes metallic and industrial mineral<br />

occurrences as well as deposits of dimension stone and other construction<br />

materials such as aggregate, clay, sand, etc. Mineral resources maps will<br />

be created directly from the database.<br />

Based on the collected material, draft final mineral resource maps will be prepared<br />

according to the requirements of the Contract and the guidelines provided by the<br />

Commission for the Geological Map of the World and more specifically in the new<br />

Metallogenic Map of Africa.<br />

3.2.5. Mapping of A-4 and B areas<br />

The fieldwork in the A-4 and B-areas (Fig. 1) has been completed during 2009.<br />

Special attention was given to stratigraphic correlation between rock formations in<br />

separate areas and their position in the litho-stratigraphic column. Detailed structural<br />

and litho-stratigraphic mapping, in places supported by petrological and<br />

geochronological data was required to solve specific geological problems. The results<br />

of fieldwork will be incorporated in the Draft Final map products.<br />

35


Activities:<br />

GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Collection of GPS-controlled structural and lithostratigraphic field data<br />

and taking of digital photographs of outcrops, done in 7108 stations.<br />

Collection of about 6 000 rock samples at GPS-controlled locations for<br />

mineralogical, petrological and stratigraphic studies and for chemical<br />

analyses, studies is ongoing.<br />

After petrographic studies the labelled and recorded thin sections will be<br />

handed over to DGSM Petrological Laboratory for future reference.<br />

Study and description of GPS-controlled mineral occurrences (metallic and<br />

industrial minerals, dimension stones and construction materials) are<br />

included in the regular mapping activity. Other selected, major mineral<br />

occurrences have been studied and described by the mineral resource<br />

experts during separate field tours.<br />

Merging of the geology into seamless draft final geological map is<br />

ongoing.<br />

Products:<br />

Draft Final geological and structural maps at scale 1:250k and 1:100k for<br />

the Project area.<br />

Rock samples, thin sections, chemical assay reports.<br />

3.2.8. Mapping of selected 1:50k scale map sheets<br />

The fieldwork will be carried out on selected high priority areas for mineral resources<br />

from where the high resolution airborne geophysics is available and the geology has<br />

potential for economic mineralization. Optimal sample locations and geological<br />

traverses are selected based on increasing knowledge of the geology during the course<br />

of the Project.<br />

3.2.9. Petrographic, geochemical and geochronological studies<br />

A limited number of petrographic, litho-geochemical, mineralogical and<br />

geochronological studies have been conducted to solve specific structural and/or<br />

stratigraphic correlation problems within the Project area. The above work is to secure<br />

a consistent quality and uniform interpretation of the geology in the entire country.<br />

Activities:<br />

Petrographic studies on thin sections of representative rock samples (of<br />

200 pcs 136 done).<br />

Microprobe analyses of key minerals in representative rock samples (800<br />

pcs)<br />

Litho-geochemical studies of representative rock samples for, e.g.,<br />

correlation of granitoid suites (of 200 pcs 65 done)<br />

Geochronologic studies of carefully selected, representative rock samples<br />

(of 15 pcs 6 done and 4 ongoing).<br />

Products:<br />

Thin sections to be prepared, labelled and later stored at the DGSM<br />

36


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Petrographic description of thin sections arranged in Excel tables.<br />

Chemical data of analyzed minerals, organized in Excel tables<br />

Chemical data with major, minor and trace elements of whole rock<br />

samples, organized in Excel tables.<br />

Results of isotope dating in tables and diagrams.<br />

Reports “Radiometric Ages for Rock Samples from Uganda” Part I<br />

(30.6.2009) and Part II (30.12.2009) have been compiled by Dr Irmeli<br />

Mänttäri.<br />

3.2.10. Mineral resources mapping<br />

Mapping of mineral occurrences, comprising metallic and industrial minerals as well<br />

as construction materials and dimension stones, has been carried out coeval with the<br />

regular geological field verification. The GTK Consortium Mineral Resources Experts<br />

have focused on the economic aspects of mineralized zones and prospects identified<br />

during earlier project phases, or during ongoing field verification.<br />

Counterpart staff from the DGSM has been provided the opportunity for practical<br />

mineral resources studies and evaluation jointly with the GTK Consortium staff.<br />

Based on the data from the Mineral Resources Database, field verification will<br />

proceed covering the attributes defined in the Contract as follows:<br />

Activities:<br />

The exact location of mineral occurrences, including a description of<br />

access, using GPS is recorded.<br />

The exposed part of the mineralization is surveyed.<br />

The type of mineralization (vein-type, stratiform, disseminated, eluvial,<br />

placer, etc.) and major economic minerals and commodities is described.<br />

The degree and depth of weathering (supergene alteration) are estimated<br />

and described.<br />

The degree and extent of primary alteration (hydrothermal alteration) will<br />

be estimated if possible.<br />

Host rock stratigraphic unit and country rock lithology is described.<br />

Status of the mineral occurrence (for example mineral showing, smallscale<br />

artisanal working, active mine or abandoned mine) has been noted.<br />

Surface sampling for estimation of grade (base metals, precious metals,<br />

rare earth metals) and/or quality (industrial minerals) is ongoing.<br />

Quality checking of the existing data against field parameters is being<br />

performed.<br />

Data entry into the Mineral Resources Database is done continuously.<br />

Ranking of the top-10 metallic mineral occurrences based on the criteria in<br />

the Contract and subject these to integrated geological, geochemical and<br />

geophysical investigations to generate upgraded reports with maps at<br />

appropriate scale.<br />

Ranking of the top-15 industrial mineral occurrences based on the criteria<br />

in the Contract and subject the top-10 industrial mineral occurrences to<br />

quantitative and qualitative field and laboratory tests, including benchscale<br />

beneficiation studies<br />

37


Products:<br />

GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Prospectivity mapping methods (remote sensing, geophysics, GIS) will be<br />

utilized in selected areas to highlight areas of enhanced mineral potential.<br />

Updated mineral occurrences database and ArcGIS files for map<br />

production.<br />

Verification of the prospectivity of areas, formations and/or structures<br />

delineated on the maps.<br />

A set of digital and hard copies of draft final mineral resource maps at a<br />

scale of 1:250k and 1:100k of the Project area and at scale 1:50k in<br />

selected, high priority areas.<br />

Reports will be compiled on the top-15 industrial mineral occurrences with<br />

maps including geological setting, shape, resource (grade, tonnage and<br />

quality) and, if deemed having economic potential, an exploration program<br />

for follow-up activities. Bench-scale test results for the top-10 industrial<br />

mineral occurrences will be included.<br />

Reports on the top-10 metallic mineral occurrences with maps including<br />

geological setting, shape, resource (grade and tonnage), earning power,<br />

pay-back period, import substitution, socio-economic aspects and an<br />

exploration program for follow-up activities.<br />

3.2.11. Geological field data processing<br />

Concluding the results of a thorough study of the existing legends, stratigraphic<br />

classification and geological maps of the Project area and other relevant areas, the<br />

GTK Consortium has prepared a preliminary legend according to international<br />

standards for geological maps.<br />

Activities:<br />

Draft final lithostratigraphic classification scheme of Uganda is produced.<br />

It is based on a consensus met in the field by DGSM, consultant’s senior<br />

advisors and involved geologists during two weeks in March <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Draft final map legend and map lay-out is being designed.<br />

Products:<br />

Draft final legend for 1: 250k scale map sheets, ongoing.<br />

3.2.12. Draft final map products and reports<br />

Updating of geological maps is a continuous process during fieldwork and will be<br />

completed jointly by the map production team and the geologists after field mapping<br />

and laboratory studies.<br />

The draft final maps will be produced according to the requirements of the contract<br />

and the guidelines provided by the Commission for the Geological Map of the World<br />

and, more specifically, according to the new International Metallogenic Map of<br />

Africa. The maps will be submitted to the Project Supervisor in digital format and as<br />

paper copies for evaluation.<br />

38


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Technical reports, including methodology and procedures, which have been applied in<br />

data processing and other activities will be prepared. Geological interpretations will<br />

be discussed and new geological observations and findings will be documented in<br />

reports. Problems encountered during the data compilation and solutions applied<br />

during the work will be described as well as recommendations for subsequent<br />

research.<br />

Activities:<br />

Processing of chemical analyses (tables and main classification diagrams).<br />

Treatment of mineral analyses.<br />

Petrographic studies.<br />

Products:<br />

A set of digital and hard copies (two each) of draft final geological and<br />

structural maps at scale of 1:250k and 1:100k for the entire project area<br />

and 1:50k for high potential areas only will be produced. The map data<br />

will be compatible with the GMIS.<br />

A set of digital and hard copies (two each) of draft final mineral resources<br />

maps (metallic and industrial minerals and construction materials) at scale<br />

of 1:250k and 1:100k for the entire project area and 1:50 covering<br />

favourable areas with ore potential, will be produced.<br />

Draft final geological notes describing the 1:250k scale geological and<br />

mineral resources maps.<br />

Problems identified in geological interpretations and considerations how to<br />

solve these.<br />

Geological observations, findings and problems, as topics for subsequent<br />

research.<br />

Reference list and review of previous studies, including the evaluation of<br />

the quality of the existing data.<br />

The information from regional geological mapping, geochemical surveys,<br />

airborne geophysical surveys and any other relevant information will be<br />

compiled to produce seamless favourability maps covering the contract<br />

area.<br />

A set of digital and hard copies (two each) of draft final geochemical maps<br />

at scales corresponding to the sample density will be produced.<br />

Report describing results of bench-scale beneficiation studies, including<br />

flow charts for ten best ranked industrial mineral commodities and a<br />

‘Manual for Field Work’ will be compiled.<br />

Draft final exploration programme and recommendations for follow up<br />

work in short-, medium- and long term will be prepared.<br />

3.3. PHASE III: FINAL PRODUCTS<br />

3.3.1. Explanation texts to geological maps<br />

Geological explanation texts will be written to the 1:250k scale map sheets. The<br />

lithostratigraphic column, including igneous, metamorphic and structural processes, in<br />

view of the geodynamic evolution of the area, as well as mineral potential, will be<br />

39


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

briefly described. Photographs, map drawings, tables and diagrams of mineral and<br />

chemical analyses will clarify the content of explanation texts.<br />

3.3.2. Preparation of geological and photo database and ArcGIS files<br />

In addition to traditional geological databases a large number of photographs taken<br />

from inspected outcrops will be captured in digital form in a modern photograph<br />

database. This makes possible to search for the photos by observation number, map<br />

sheet etc. Photos are also linked to ArcGIS files.<br />

Activities:<br />

Preparation of final ArcGIS files of seamless geological map data<br />

including litho-stratigraphic and structural layers.<br />

Preparation of final databases of samples for geochemical analyses, age<br />

determinations and observation points.<br />

Petrographic analyses.<br />

Finalizing the digital photo database.<br />

Products:<br />

ArcGIS layers of sample and geological observation points.<br />

ArcGIS layers of lithological polygons, structural linear and point<br />

elements.<br />

Geo-referenced ArcGIS-compatible databases of observation points and<br />

analyzed samples including age determinations.<br />

3.3.3. Preparation of mineral occurrences database<br />

Activities:<br />

Updating the mineral occurrences database with analytical results of the<br />

collected samples and other information resulting from field inspection.<br />

Finalizing the information of the mineral occurrences.<br />

Products:<br />

Geo-referenced ArcGIS compatible database of the mineral occurrences.<br />

3.3.4. Preparation of legend<br />

Activities:<br />

Finalizing the map legend<br />

Products:<br />

Final Legends for the geological map sheets<br />

40


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

3.3.5. Production of geological maps and observation database<br />

The final version of the geological map products, including map symbols, layout and<br />

printing of hard-copy maps will be completed during Phase III. The final mineral<br />

resources database and final mineral resources map products will also be completed<br />

during Phase III.<br />

Activities:<br />

Finalizing map symbols and lay-out.<br />

Printing hard copies of the 1:250k, 1:100k and selected 1:50k scale map<br />

sheets.<br />

Products:<br />

A digital copy in ArcGIS-compatible format of observation points.<br />

A digital copy in ArcGIS-compatible format of all sample points<br />

(geochemical analyses, geochronological data, petrographic descriptions).<br />

A digital copy in ArcGIS-compatible format of the final geological maps<br />

A set of hard copy maps of the 1:250k, 1:100k and selected 1:50k map<br />

sheets (one copy of each sheet), with the observation points plotted on<br />

geology.<br />

3.3.6. Production of digital map sheets<br />

All digital products will be provided exclusively on External Memory or DVD and<br />

integrated into the existing databases. Final version of products consisting of spatial<br />

data will be:<br />

In ArcGIS- and GMIS compatible format.<br />

Map sheets also on pdf-format ready for printing.<br />

Reports and other text documentation will be in pdf-formats.<br />

3.3.7. Final Technical Report<br />

The final technical report summarizes the methodologies used, activities and results of<br />

the different project phases, gives recommendations for the future geological and<br />

mineral resources surveys and defines the potential areas where follow-up work could<br />

be continued either by private companies or as a part of government policy.<br />

4. TRAINING PLAN<br />

Training constitutes an essential component of the Project. It will ensure the transfer<br />

of knowledge and skills of regional geological mapping methods and the use of<br />

modern digital technology.<br />

The main training component consists of on-the-job training during implementation of<br />

the Project focusing on working methods applied in geological mapping, mineral<br />

assessment surveys, geochemical surveys and ground geophysical surveys. The<br />

formal training will also focus on data processing, interpretation and map production.<br />

41


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

4.1. OBJECTIVES<br />

The main objective of the training is to provide DGSM staff with adequate knowledge<br />

and skills to conduct all successive stages required in digital geological mapping and<br />

map production independently after the completion of this Project. Although the<br />

emphasis will be on on-the-job training, the basic theoretical background of modern<br />

digital geological mapping and map production will also be dealt with in the course of<br />

the Project. Preparation of scientific papers and presentations for workshops or<br />

conferences is also included in training towards the end of the project.<br />

To optimize the transfer of knowledge and skills, the GTK Consortium will ensure the<br />

participation of the DGSM personnel at all stages of project implementation. The<br />

training program is composed of three different components:<br />

On-the-job training.<br />

Training courses and practical training at the DGSM in Entebbe<br />

Courses and conferences outside Uganda.<br />

4.2. ON-THE-JOB-TRAINING<br />

The on-the-job training is mainly concentrated on field activities, including training in<br />

data integration, interpretation and map compilation in field. Training has been given<br />

to four geologists at a time during the course of the project field activities.<br />

On-the-job training will be supported by formal courses dealing with the theories on<br />

which the practical applications are based.<br />

4.3. TRAINING COURSES IN UGANDA<br />

Theoretical training has been organized to ensure the transfer of information from the<br />

GTK Consortium to the DGSM staff and to create a productive and collaborative<br />

atmosphere among the Project team members, national and expatriate.<br />

1. Two “Geological mapping” courses including Remote sensing and GIS<br />

component and covering data collection, sedimentology, structural,<br />

metamorphic and igneous geology for DGSM geoscientists split into two lots<br />

for a period of two (2) weeks per lot.<br />

2. One “Mineral Resources Assessment” course including Remote sensing and<br />

GIS component and covering both metallic and industrial minerals, for 20<br />

selected geoscientists for a period of two (2) weeks.<br />

3. One “Data base management for geological mapping” covering Image<br />

processing, GIS Data Modelling and integration for 15 selected geoscientists<br />

for a period of two (2) weeks.<br />

4. One Geochemical Surveys course covering survey designs and data<br />

interpretation using multivariate statistical methods for 12 selected<br />

geoscientists for a period of two (2) weeks.<br />

5. One Ground Geophysical Surveys course covering data analysis and<br />

integration for 12 selected geoscientists for a period of two (2) weeks.<br />

42


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

4.4. OVERSEAS TRAINING<br />

Due to budgetary strains, overseas training has been allocated to the NDF component<br />

of the Project. During <strong>2010</strong> two study tours will be arranged to active exploration<br />

areas in South Africa. The course will be tailored by CGS for the DGSM trainees.<br />

Overseas training in remote sensing, image processing and interpretation was tailored<br />

for eight (8) DGSM staff members: James Natukuna, Deaus Katomi Muhwezi,<br />

Richard Kiggwe, Paul Lugoko, Peter Mawejje, Vincent Kedi, Lauben Twinomujuni<br />

and Annet Namboyera.<br />

The course was organised at ITC (Netherlands) for a period of two months in 4.1. to<br />

26.2.<strong>2010</strong>. The content of the course concentrated on different sophisticated<br />

technologies needed in exploration such as GIS, data processing and map production.<br />

In training the newly collected data from mapping areas was processed and utilized.<br />

DGSM staff members are encouraged also to participate in international conferences<br />

in order to integrate themselves into the international science society. Joint papers of<br />

DGSM and GTK Consortium geologists will be prepared and presented in<br />

international conferences as a synthesis of work in the project. This will create<br />

appropriate contact networks, which are important for the further development of the<br />

DGSM and the whole mining sector in Uganda. Local conferences, ideally coeval<br />

with the workshops, can be organized, in collaboration with the DGSM, to keep the<br />

geo-science community of Uganda abreast of the progress of the Project.<br />

4.5. UPDATED TRAINING PLAN<br />

The training plan presented in the Inception Report has been updated continuously in<br />

the quarterly reports. The formal courses required by the contract have now all been<br />

completed. Training proceeds in the form of field work, such as geological mapping,<br />

geochemical sampling and geophysical ground surveys.<br />

5. EQUIPMENT INVENTORY<br />

The DGSM plans to procure some equipment required for future field work. The lists<br />

annexed to the Contract (Annex 2 and 3) have been scrutinized and cost estimates of<br />

the equipment made by GTK Consortium and presented in the Inception Report. The<br />

estimate was based on contacts with some well established companies operating in<br />

this field (Corstore SA and Ben Meadows USA) that have probably the most<br />

comprehensive selection of survey items.<br />

Updated equipment lists, specifications and prises were presented to SMMRP officers<br />

for further evaluation in beginning of September.<br />

Regarding the equipment list in Contract Annex 3, it is obvious that most items can be<br />

purchased locally. However, it is proposed that the amounts of items would be<br />

considered carefully so that the actual needs are met.<br />

The revised inventory survey of equipment was carried out in two separate visits in<br />

Entebbe. In order to get realistic cost estimation internet was used to select feasible<br />

suppliers. Six international suppliers had a reasonable stock of required items.<br />

43


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

The collection of equipment in the Inception Report is fragmented and very<br />

inhomogeneous varying from socks to sophisticated geophysical equipments. The<br />

employer decided to leave out geophysical equipment at this stage. As stated in the<br />

Inception Report most of the items listed in Contract Annex 3 can be purchased<br />

locally. There are also items on Annex 2 which can be replaced with locally<br />

manufactured ones. A good example is aluminum storage boxes (total no 45 pcs).<br />

Volume of that amount of boxes is high and transportation in the sea container from<br />

abroad is not cost-effective. The consultant proposes to change aluminum boxes to<br />

locally made steel boxes.<br />

Manual cameras are no more present-day technology and the consultant proposes a<br />

digital system camera instead. Development of paper prints and negative films is<br />

already rare in Europe amongst professionals. The rapid development of digital<br />

equipment is a problem. The exact model is hard to stipulate and hope that the<br />

production of the selected model remains unchanged until the date of purchase. A<br />

purchaser should however, give an alternative option.<br />

The results of the survey were presented in excel format in the Annual Report.<br />

The necessity of some items still needs to be discussed with the employer. If one of<br />

Trimble’s models is selected as a “Personal Digital Assistant”, it will have a<br />

significant effect since prices without accessories are from USD 2000 upwards.<br />

Trimble has a built-in accurate GPS.<br />

The consultant proposes employer to analyse the need for the camping equipment<br />

carefully. The best knowledge of manufacturing tents for local condition is<br />

undoubtedly in Kenya and in South Africa. It is therefore proposed to separate these<br />

from the main purchase.<br />

As was reported the total minimum cost will remain reasonable (about 163 000 USD).<br />

However, transportation and handling costs, added to the service fee of the<br />

international purchase agent, will almost double the costs.<br />

The above survey gives a base for the procurement and the consultant proposes to<br />

divide the procedure for several tender requests.<br />

APPENDICES<br />

1. Activity schedule, Updated Gantt Chart, April <strong>2010</strong><br />

2. Training courses carried out<br />

3. DGSM staff involved in training<br />

44


Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project<br />

GTK CONSORTIUM<br />

<strong>IDA</strong> Cr. No. 3835-UG GEOLOGICAL MAPPING, GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS AND MINERAL<br />

<br />

<br />

RESOURCES ASSESSMENT IN SELECTED AREAS OF UGANDA<br />

Appendix 1<br />

ACTIVITY SCHEDULE<br />

ID Task Name<br />

1 Uganda Geological mapping, mineral resources assessment, geochemical surveys<br />

2 Signing of Contract<br />

3 Commencement date/advance payment<br />

4 PHASE I Data gathering and preparation<br />

5 Inventory of all available geodata<br />

6 Hard copy maps<br />

15 Digital data<br />

25 Data bases<br />

31 Data processing<br />

39 Mobilisation<br />

40 Preliminary field reconnaissance<br />

41 PHASE II Geoscientific synthesis, field work and compilation of draft maps and<br />

reports<br />

42 Analysis and synthesis of all relevant digital data<br />

43 Construction of preliminary lithostratigraphic database<br />

44 Preliminary Geological model for Project Area/Uganda<br />

45 SELECTED THEMATIC AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL MAPS<br />

46 PRELIMINARY GEOLOGICAL MAPS Block 1<br />

47 PRELIMINARY GEOLOGICAL MAPS Blocks 2,3 and 7<br />

48 Available geochemical maps and chemical analyses<br />

49 PRELIMINARY GEOCHEMICAL MAP<br />

50 National Geochemical Database for Project Area<br />

51 Field verification, geological mapping and sampling<br />

52 Geological Field Mapping Block 1 and Kampala<br />

53 Geological Field Mapping Block 2,3 and 7<br />

54 Mineral Resources Assessment (metallic and industrial minerals and construc<br />

55 Geochemical orientation survey<br />

56 Design ground geophysical exploration program<br />

57 Processing of field observations and samples<br />

58 Petrographic thin section analyses<br />

59 Lithogeochemistry<br />

60 Age determinations analytics, interpretation<br />

61 Petrophysical database<br />

62 Updated lithostratigraphy<br />

63 Updated geological model<br />

64 Updated Mineral Occurrence Database<br />

65 Plan for detailed field verification and mineral assessment<br />

70 DRAFT FINAL PRODUCTS<br />

71 FIELD VERIFICATION<br />

72 mapping of selected high priority areas<br />

73 mineral resources assessment<br />

74 geochemical follow up survey<br />

75 Geological and Mineral resources Maps 1:250k and 1:100k<br />

76 Follow up high priority zones<br />

77 Petrophysical, petrographic and age dating databases<br />

78 Mineral Occurrence Database<br />

79 Geological report to the 1:250k maps<br />

80 report and provisional exploration programmes<br />

81 integrated geological, geochemical and ground geophysical exploration<br />

Task<br />

Critical Task<br />

Progress<br />

Milestone<br />

Summary<br />

Rolled Up Task<br />

2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2011<br />

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul<br />

Rolled Up Critical Task<br />

Rolled Up Milestone<br />

Rolled Up Progress<br />

Split<br />

External Tasks<br />

Project Summary<br />

Group By Summary<br />

Deadline


Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources Project<br />

<strong>IDA</strong> Cr. No. 3835-UG GEOLOGICAL MAPPING, GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS AND MINERAL<br />

RESOURCES ASSESSMENT IN SELECTED AREAS OF UGANDA<br />

ID Task Name<br />

82 Geochemical maps of the new surveys<br />

83 Procurement plan for the Geochemical Unit in DGSM<br />

84 Predictability/favourability maps in scale 1:250k for selected high priority areas<br />

85 Draft Final Products<br />

86 PHASE III Final Digital Products<br />

87 Mineral Occurrence Database<br />

88 Petrophysical, petrographic and age dating databases<br />

89 Geological and Mineral resources maps in 1:250k and 100k<br />

90 Geological and Mineral resources maps in 1:50k sheets for high priority zones<br />

91 Manual for field and laboratory procedures for study of Industrial Minerals<br />

92 Geological report to the 1:250k maps<br />

93 report including provisional exploration program<br />

94 bench scale benefication studies of selected IM deposits<br />

95 Training<br />

96 on-the-job training (4 trainees)<br />

97 on-the-job training, target follow up (6 trainees)<br />

98 training course outside Uganda (ITC 8 trainees 2 months, NDF)<br />

99 Training courses in Uganda<br />

100 Geological Mapping 1<br />

101 Geological Mapping 2<br />

102 Mineral resources assessment, prospectivity theory<br />

103 Mineral resources assessment, field work<br />

104 Data Base Management<br />

105 Geochemical Surveys<br />

106 Geophysical Ground Surveys<br />

107 Reporting<br />

108 Inception report<br />

109 <strong>Quarter</strong>ly Report<br />

110 Annual reports<br />

111 Annual report 2009 and Action Plan for <strong>2010</strong><br />

112 Annual report <strong>2010</strong> and Action Plan for 2011<br />

113 Final Reports<br />

114 Preliminary Final Report<br />

115 Revised Final Report<br />

116 Final Technical Report<br />

117 Deliverables<br />

118 Inception Report<br />

119 Preliminary Geological Maps<br />

120 Thematic Airborne Geophysical maps<br />

121 Database for petrophysics and age determinations<br />

122 Draft Final Geological maps<br />

123 Draft Final Mineral maps<br />

124 Draft Final Geochemical maps<br />

125 Industrial Minerals report<br />

126 Exploration Program<br />

127 Preliminary Final maps and reports<br />

128 Revised Final maps and reports<br />

Task<br />

Critical Task<br />

Progress<br />

Milestone<br />

Summary<br />

Rolled Up Task<br />

2009 <strong>2010</strong> 2011<br />

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul<br />

Rolled Up Critical Task<br />

Rolled Up Milestone<br />

Rolled Up Progress<br />

ACTIVITY SCHEDULE<br />

Split<br />

External Tasks<br />

Project Summary<br />

Group By Summary<br />

Deadline<br />

GTK CONSORTIUM<br />

<strong>Quarter</strong>ly Report 1/<strong>2010</strong><br />

Appendix 1


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

Training courses carried out<br />

App.2. Formal training courses<br />

Training course<br />

no of<br />

Timing Responsible Support<br />

trainees length includes<br />

field<br />

Location<br />

organizer<br />

work<br />

GTK: Salminen, CGS: Elsenbroek,<br />

Entebbe,<br />

1 Geochemical Surveys 18–29 May 2009<br />

Lehto<br />

Netshitungalwana<br />

GTK: Westerhof,<br />

12 2 weeks x Mityana<br />

ITC: Woldai, Manninen, Lehto,<br />

Entebbe,<br />

2 Geological Mapping 1 1–12 June 2009<br />

GAF Schumann CGS:Hartzer 15 2 weeks x Jinja<br />

GTK: Saalmann,<br />

Entebbe,<br />

3 Geological Mapping 2 2.11 – 13.11. 2009 ITC: Woldai<br />

ITC:Ruitenbeek,<br />

Manninen, 20 2 weeks x Kiboga<br />

4 Date Base Management 31/8 – 11.9. 2009<br />

Carranza 16 2 weeks Entebbe<br />

GTK:Kuivasaari,<br />

Entebbe,<br />

28.9 – 2.10. 2009, 23 –<br />

Pekkala, Härmä,<br />

Kamalenge,<br />

5 Mineral Resources Assessment 26.11., 30.11.2009 ITC: Carranza,<br />

GTK:<br />

Lehto 20 2 weeks<br />

Mubende<br />

Ruotoistenmäki,<br />

Entebbe,<br />

6 Ground Geophysical Surveys 30.11 – 11.12. 2009 Lehtimäki GTK: Lehto 9 2 weeks x Kamalenge<br />

7 Study tour / excursion 1 in SA To be organized in NDF<br />

8 Study tour / excursion 2 in SA To be organized in NDF<br />

9<br />

Tailor-made training, mapping<br />

and exploration<br />

4.1. – 26.2. <strong>2010</strong><br />

As NDF training<br />

CGS: Hartzer,<br />

Agenbach,<br />

Baglow 4 2 weeks x South-Africa<br />

CGS: Hartzer,<br />

Agenbach,<br />

Baglow 4 2 weeks x South-Africa<br />

ITC:<br />

Ruitenbeek,<br />

Barrit,<br />

Carranza,<br />

Smeth, Woldai 8 2 months x<br />

The<br />

Netherlands,<br />

Enchede


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

GEOLOGICAL MAPPING, GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS AND MINERAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT (<strong>IDA</strong>)<br />

DGSM staff involved in training, Service Provider GTK Consortium<br />

App.3. DGSM staff in<br />

training<br />

MRA= Mineral Resources<br />

Assessment Course, ITC=<br />

Jan-Feb <strong>2010</strong> in Enchede<br />

NAME POST QUALIFICATIONS NOTES COURSES<br />

1. Peter Turyasingura Senior Geochemist BSc. (Hons) +3 cert. On-the-job training 4-15/3,<br />

22/7 – 22/8, 2009,<br />

geochemical sampling 15/3 Geochemical Surveys, Geological<br />

2. James Natukunda Senior Geologist<br />

(Mapping)<br />

3. Vincent Kato Senior Geologist (Industrial<br />

Minerals)<br />

BSc. (Hons), Dip. Educ. + 4<br />

cert.<br />

BSc. (Hons), MSc. Dip.<br />

(Geotherm.) + 5 cert<br />

<strong>2010</strong> onwards<br />

On-the-job training 4-15/3,<br />

2009, lithostratigraphy 17-<br />

26/3, <strong>2010</strong><br />

On-the-job training 23-30/6,<br />

22/8 – 11/9, 3-20/11, 2009.<br />

Mineral resources March<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Mapping 1 and 2, MRA<br />

Database Management, Geological<br />

mapping 2, MRA, ITC 2 months<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Geochemical Surveys (theory)<br />

MRA<br />

4. Gabriel Data Senior Geologist (Metallic<br />

Minerals)<br />

BSc. (Hons), MSc. Min.<br />

Exploration + 3 cert.<br />

Mineral resources March<br />

<strong>2010</strong> Geological Mapping 1<br />

5. Annet Tumwine Senior Geologist (Remote BSc. (Hons), MSc. (GIS) + 4 On-the-job training 27/3-<br />

Sensing)<br />

cert<br />

10/4, 22/7 – 22/8, 2009. Geochemical Surveys, Geological<br />

lithostratigraphy 17-26/3, Mapping 1 and 2, Database<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Management,<br />

6. Fred Kigereigu Senior Geologist<br />

BSc. (Hons), Dip. Educ., On-the-job training 27/3-<br />

(Petrology)<br />

MSc. (Petrology) + 1 cert 10/4, 2009. Geochemistry<br />

15/3, <strong>2010</strong> on Geological Mapping 1 and 2, MRA<br />

7. Andrew Katumwehe Geophysicist BSc. (Hons), MSc.<br />

(Exploration Geophysics). Ground Geophysics


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

8. Deus. K. Muhwezi Geochemist BSc. (Hons), Dip. Educ.,<br />

MSc. (Geochem.) + 3 cert.<br />

On-the-job training 27/3-<br />

10/4, 2009. Geochemical<br />

sampling 15/3, <strong>2010</strong> on<br />

9. Edward Isabirye Geologist BSc. (Hons), MSc. (Min.<br />

Expl.) + 6 cert. On the job training 22/7 –<br />

10.Richard Kiggwe Geologist BSc. (Hons), Dip. Educ. + 1<br />

cert<br />

22/8, 21/9 – 25/9, 2009<br />

On-the-job training 27/3-<br />

10/4, 2009. Geochemical<br />

Geological Mapping 2, ITC 2 months<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Geochemical Surveys, Geological<br />

Mapping 1 and 2, Database<br />

Management<br />

sampling 15/3, <strong>2010</strong> on<br />

Geological Mapping 1, ITC 2 months<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

11. Catherine Nyakecho Geologist BSc. (Hons) + 1 cert. On-the-job training 23/6– Geochemical Surveys, Geological<br />

22/7, 2009. Geochemical Mapping 1 and 2, Database<br />

sampling 15/3, <strong>2010</strong> on Management<br />

12. Isa Lugaizi Geologist BSc. (Hons),<br />

On-the-job training 4-<br />

MSc.(Geohazards)<br />

15/3,22/7 – 22/8, 23-26/11,<br />

2009 Geological Mapping 1<br />

13. Martin Ekiryagana Geologist BSc. (Hons) + 4 cert On-the-job training 4-15/3, Geological Mapping 1 and 2,<br />

2009<br />

Database Management<br />

14. Paul Lugoko Geologist BSc. (Hons) + 2 cert<br />

Geochemical Surveys, Geological<br />

On-the-job training 23/6 – Mapping 1, Database Management,<br />

22/7, 2009<br />

ITC<br />

15. Peter Mawejje Geologist BSc. (Hons) + 7 cert.<br />

Geochemical Surveys, Geological<br />

Mapping 1, Database Management,<br />

On-the-job training 14 – 25/9 MRA, ITC<br />

16. Henry Ngada Geologist BSc. (Hons) + 2 cert On-the-job training 22/8 –<br />

25/9, 2009<br />

17. Eriya Kahwa Geologist BSc. (Hons) + 5<br />

On-the-job training 30/11- Database Management, Geological<br />

cert<br />

11/12, 2009<br />

Mapping 2, Ground Geophysics<br />

18. Vincent Kedi Geologist On-the-job-training 12/10 –<br />

13/11, 2009 Database Management, MRA, ITC<br />

19. Joseph Kinyera Geophysics Data Clerk 3<br />

On-the-job training 30/11 – Database Management, Ground<br />

cert<br />

11/12, 2009<br />

Geophysics


GTK CONSORTIUM QUARTERLY REPORT JANUARY-MARCH <strong>2010</strong> – <strong>IDA</strong><br />

20. Robert Macheri Geophysics Data Clerk 3<br />

On-the-job training 30/11 – Database Management, Ground<br />

cert<br />

11/12, 2009<br />

Geophysics<br />

21. Henry Luwemba Kasule Geologist Geochemical sampling 23/3, Database Management, Geological<br />

<strong>2010</strong> on<br />

Mapping 2, MRA<br />

22. Isaac Bisaso PEPD Geophysicist BSc.<br />

(Hons)<br />

Database Management<br />

23. Richard Birungi Intern Officer On-the-job training 30/11- Database Management, Ground<br />

11/12, 2009<br />

Geophysics<br />

24. Lauben Twinomujuni Geochemist<br />

Geochemical Surveys, Geological<br />

On-the-job training 23/6 – Mapping 1, Database Management,<br />

22/7, 2009<br />

ITC 2 months <strong>2010</strong><br />

25. Molly Bakka Male Geologist<br />

Geological Mapping 1 and 2, MRA<br />

26. Isaiah Tumwikirize Senior Geophysical Dip. Sc. Tech., PGDip.<br />

Technician<br />

(Seismology), Bachelor of<br />

Dev. Studies; BSc.(Hons.)<br />

(Geophysics) + 5 cert. Ground Geophysics<br />

27. Peter Oundo Ojanji Ass. Geological Officer Geological mapping 2<br />

28. Annet Namboyera Asst. Geological Officer Dip. Science Tech. (Physics) On-the-job training 22/8 – Geological Mapping 1, MRA, ITC 2<br />

+ 3 cert.<br />

25/9, 2009<br />

months <strong>2010</strong><br />

29. Freddie Muitta Geophysical Technician Certificate in El Inst.<br />

Database Management, Ground<br />

Geophysics<br />

30. Joseph Nyago Geophysical Technician Dip. (Physics), BSc. Tech.<br />

(Physics) + 3 cert.<br />

Ground Geophysics<br />

31. Marion Leku Intern Officer Geochemical sampling 15/4,<br />

<strong>2010</strong> onwards Geological Mapping 2, MRA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!