Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice

Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice

library.umaine.edu
from library.umaine.edu More from this publisher
02.04.2013 Views

that, according to Eaves and Kimpel, grew substantially during the next twenty years (55-56). The House of Commons knew Richardson's business, and his intimate relationship with the Speaker contributed, as well, to his being chosen to perform the task of printing the Journals. Specifically, the General Index to the Sessional Papers Printed for the House of Lords shows that Richardson was the printer for the entire entry of bills dealing with clandestine marriages. The clandestine marriage bills, which eventually would be made law, dated from their inception in 1739 to their repeal in 1765 (112). Richardson would have been responsible for all of the printings except the repeal, which passed four years after his death. Among other bills dealing with inheritance and family settlements introduced in the House of Commons and printed by Richardson in the Journals are the "Devices of Estates Bill" in 1751, the "Attestation of Wills Bill," in 1751, and the "Forfeited Estates in Scotland Bill," also introduced in 1751. These bills, with the exception of the bills dealing with clandestine marriage, were published after Clarissa, but their presence in such close proximity to its publication indicates a regular presence of debate and reporting that would have been

included in the compilation of the Journal. - The Catalogue of Papers Printed by the Order of the House of Commons for the years encompassing Richardson's printing includes bills dealing with estate laws, inheritance laws, and marriage laws. Thus, Richardsonf s close association with the House of Commons and its Speaker, along with his familiarity with law and legal language, situate him comfortably in the heart of eighteenth- century inheritance practice and marriage settlement. William Sale explores other publications that Richardson was involved with, and the list is long and 4 varied regarding the subject of the law. One pamphlet, according to Sale, published anonymously in 1753, includes Richardsonf s own sentiment that "all men are beasts of prey" (Master Printer 203). Sale also mentions Richardsonf s association with both Tory and Whig periodical publications, which enhanced his ambivalence toward his own class, an ambivalence that had its ultimate expression, according to Sale, in the tension- filled relationship between Clarissa and Robert Lovelace Richardson was responsible for the printing and publications of many private books and pamphlets dealing with marriage, estates and inheritance practice. Sale details the nature and titles of these books in Samuel Richardson: Master Printer. The lengthy list of these titles only adds to the conviction that Richardson was well versed in the language, structure, and application of inheritance law.

that, according to Eaves and Kimpel, grew substantially<br />

during the next twenty years (55-56). The House of<br />

Commons knew Richardson's business, and his intimate<br />

relationship with the Speaker contributed, as well, to<br />

his being chosen to perform the task of printing the<br />

Journals. Specifically, the General <strong>In</strong>dex to the<br />

Sessional Papers Printed for the House of Lords shows<br />

that Richardson was the printer for the entire entry of<br />

bills dealing with clandestine marriages. The<br />

clandestine marriage bills, which eventually would be<br />

made law, dated from their inception in 1739 to their<br />

repeal in 1765 (112). Richardson would have been<br />

responsible for all of the printings except the repeal,<br />

which passed four years after his death.<br />

Among other bills dealing with inheritance and<br />

family settlements introduced in the House of Commons and<br />

printed by Richardson in the Journals are the "Devices of<br />

Estates Bill" in 1751, the "Attestation of Wills Bill,"<br />

in 1751, and the "Forfeited Estates in Scotland Bill,"<br />

also introduced in 1751. These bills, with the exception<br />

of the bills dealing with clandestine marriage, were<br />

published after <strong>Clarissa</strong>, but their presence in such<br />

close proximity to its publication indicates a regular<br />

presence of debate and reporting that would have been

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!