Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice

Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice

library.umaine.edu
from library.umaine.edu More from this publisher
02.04.2013 Views

. . but the highest and purest that humanity can reach" to teach us ultimately "what we can hope, and what we can perform" (178) . The standards of virtue Johnson hints at are very much at the center of marriage and inheritance practice. Not all early novels are about inheritance and children poised to inherit, but situated among them is a small group of novels deeply influenced by the real life language and practice of inheritance. Affirmations and Applications Perhaps the urge to apply the more intricate legal aspects of eighteenth-century life to literature began with Lawrence Stone's 1977 publication of Family, Sex and Marriage in English 1500-1800. Stone's conjectures regarding inheritance practices and strict settlement brought a flurry of criticism from such prominent legal historians as John Habbakuk and Randolph Trumbach. Among others, David Sugarman and Eileen Spring soon followed, finding flaws in not only Stone, but also in his early critics. Wrangling over legal issues made a distinct impression on literary scholars, and although a growing number of literary studies explore the many applications of inheritance law and practice in the eighteenth century

culture, this is the first study to analyze the effects of that practice and language on the eighteenth-century novel. The predicament of a young woman involved in the inheritance structure of her family developed early in eighteenth-century literature and continued to grow as an important aspect of plot. Thompson suggests, "From Pamela to Amelia to Evelina to Emma, the question each narrative explores is what makes the heroine worthy, suitable, valuable" (22). Nancy Armstrong and Katherine Soba Green argue strongly for the value of virtue and a womanf s worthiness to marry or be successful in real life as virtue strongly centers itself in early novels. This study argues that marriage, so closely linked with primogeniture and strict settlement in the eighteenth century, was a form of inheritance. After all, women who were "conduits" for land could not be more closely tied with inheritance. Eighteenth-century ownership of land was inextricably tied to economic, political and social power. The tie, emphasized by Armstrong through the sexual contract and Green through the marriage contract, also emphasizes the importance of marriage as an economic and commercial venture for families of importance.

. . but the highest and purest that humanity can reach"<br />

to teach us ultimately "what we can hope, and what we can<br />

perform" (178) . The standards of virtue Johnson hints<br />

at are very much at the center of marriage and<br />

inheritance practice. Not all early novels are about<br />

inheritance and children poised to inherit, but situated<br />

among them is a small group of novels deeply influenced<br />

by the real life language and practice of inheritance.<br />

Affirmations and Applications<br />

Perhaps the urge to apply the more intricate legal<br />

aspects of eighteenth-century life to literature began<br />

with Lawrence Stone's 1977 publication of Family, Sex and<br />

Marriage in English 1500-1800. Stone's conjectures<br />

regarding inheritance practices and strict settlement<br />

brought a flurry of criticism from such prominent legal<br />

historians as John Habbakuk and Randolph Trumbach. Among<br />

others, David Sugarman and Eileen Spring soon followed,<br />

finding flaws in not only Stone, but also in his early<br />

critics. Wrangling over legal issues made a distinct<br />

impression on literary scholars, and although a growing<br />

number of literary studies explore the many applications<br />

of inheritance law and practice in the eighteenth century

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!