Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice
Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice
she was intimately aware of marriage practice and settlement practice as they chose their wives. Austen may not have articulated her awareness in her letters or in her novels, but her reflections in her novels, like in her letters, depict an attitude of "amused and uncomplaining comment." Austen brings an awareness of and experience with inheritance practice and its language different from Clarissa and Evelina. Vivien Jones points out Austen' s alertness "to the complexities and insecurities of her own social constituency" of rural England at a time when estates were being bought, rented or created by the rising merchant class (Introduction xxxiii). Pride and Prejudice is an excellent representation of inheritance practice and language because of the legal aberrations that it presents. Ivor Morris observes that the texture of the language within Austen's novels reiterates "the values of commerce and property, the counting houses and the inherited estate" (51) . However, legal aberrations define the situations of Mr. Bennet, Mr. Collins, and Mr. Wickham and show Austen' s awareness that the power of inheritance and patronage stems from. She places characters in predicaments of inheritance the law could not foresee.
Critics place great emphasis on the women of Austen's novels and the treatment they receive at the hand of males through inheritance and patronage. However, the males of her novels, such as Mr. Bennet, Collins, and Wickham, become intriguing characters as they are also pawns in the settlement game. Their language, their actions, and their futures depend on how inheritance practice touches them. Just as the Bennet women, like many women of the time, lived out their lives according to whatever accustomed pattern of privilege had been bestowed upon them, these particular men must come to terms with events they never considered would visit their lives. How they deal with their inheritance circumstances sheds new light on both Pride and Prejudice and on the power of inheritance practice and language over men in the eighteenth century. Rachel Trickett believes Austen realistically portrays the social and financial status of each of her characters in order to situate them among the same class of which she was a member, a "section expanding from the landed gentry down to the professional families in the mercantile rich who had made their fortunes in trade" (297). Trickett continues, pointing out that Austen "locates every character of importance
- Page 117 and 118: egarding women's places in society.
- Page 119 and 120: Kristina Straub, Julia Epstein and
- Page 121 and 122: she married Charles Burney. The rep
- Page 123 and 124: The language of inheritance is dupl
- Page 125 and 126: accounting of the Evelyn family eve
- Page 127 and 128: Other than his education and a few
- Page 129 and 130: and from the upper classes if he is
- Page 131 and 132: Susan Greenfield points out that Vi
- Page 133 and 134: decision, and then leaves his charg
- Page 135 and 136: a position as the head of his famil
- Page 137 and 138: (Spring 8-38). Caroline Evelyn is a
- Page 139 and 140: always, willing to "obey custom rat
- Page 141 and 142: ecitation and finally believing the
- Page 143 and 144: ignorant of this one young woman, o
- Page 145 and 146: One cannot fathom the Evelyn family
- Page 147 and 148: more powerful than any apprehension
- Page 149 and 150: let alone Evelina. Willoughby and L
- Page 151 and 152: Burney chose a woman and one of amb
- Page 153 and 154: matter her inheritance; only patril
- Page 155 and 156: culture without the help of a fathe
- Page 157 and 158: first encounter with her father. At
- Page 159 and 160: a clandestine marriage with Sir Joh
- Page 161 and 162: time (Straub 2-3). Questions about
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter Four Property Rites: Inheri
- Page 165 and 166: storyline follows the courtship of
- Page 167: motion. Eileen Spring tells us that
- Page 171 and 172: not favoritism, ultimately decide w
- Page 173 and 174: driving Austen' s characters and wo
- Page 175 and 176: Overtones of the pecuniary plight o
- Page 177 and 178: tendency to believe he could have d
- Page 179 and 180: dignity, irony, silence. The Bennet
- Page 181 and 182: family through provision for his ma
- Page 183 and 184: thousand pounds was enough to make
- Page 185 and 186: her husband's considerable intellig
- Page 187 and 188: inability to comprehend inheritance
- Page 189 and 190: espect" will always betray his lack
- Page 191 and 192: to heighten his bad qualities and h
- Page 193 and 194: the symbol of the Bennet dynasty, i
- Page 195 and 196: "name has become a byword for a sil
- Page 197 and 198: complimentsf] as unstudied an air a
- Page 199 and 200: with him from the moment she sees h
- Page 201 and 202: her, "Upon my word, I say no more h
- Page 203 and 204: marrying a woman for love. Yet, the
- Page 205 and 206: practice well enough to know that a
- Page 207 and 208: Lydia, like her mother, cannot see
- Page 209 and 210: Had Mr. Bennet removed the entail b
- Page 211 and 212: to believe. He talks of the late Mr
- Page 213 and 214: and Mr. Collins could well find the
- Page 215 and 216: wealth were difficult to determine,
- Page 217 and 218: the language of effects of strict s
Critics place great emphasis on the women of<br />
Austen's novels and the treatment they receive at the<br />
hand of males through inheritance and patronage.<br />
However, the males of her novels, such as Mr. Bennet,<br />
Collins, and Wickham, become intriguing characters as<br />
they are also pawns in the settlement game. Their<br />
language, their actions, and their futures depend on how<br />
inheritance practice touches them.<br />
Just as the Bennet women, like many women of the<br />
time, lived out their lives according to whatever<br />
accustomed pattern of privilege had been bestowed upon<br />
them, these particular men must come to terms with events<br />
they never considered would visit their lives. How they<br />
deal with their inheritance circumstances sheds new<br />
light on both <strong>Pride</strong> and <strong>Prejudice</strong> and on the power of<br />
inheritance practice and language over men in the<br />
eighteenth century. Rachel Trickett believes Austen<br />
realistically portrays the social and financial status of<br />
each of her characters in order to situate them among the<br />
same class of which she was a member, a "section<br />
expanding from the landed gentry down to the professional<br />
families in the mercantile rich who had made their<br />
fortunes in trade" (297). Trickett continues, pointing<br />
out that Austen "locates every character of importance