Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice
Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice
the ability to gain title or a seat in the House, landed families had to devise a stronger and narrower practice of inheritance that would not come under the jurisdiction of common law and that could stand on its own regulation. Strict settlement, or the practice of attaching a rigid, unchangeable succession of male heirs to an estate, was designed exclusively to keep large estates in the hands of male inheritors and free from the jurisdiction of common law. A strict settlement was not a will. Strict settlement was a practice separate from other inheritance practices. Thus, the eldest male and estate owner could not only rely on strict settlement to formulate the passing of the family estate, but he could also write personal wills in order to provide for specific family members, willing away specific personalty, or "ephemeral" property as he wished. Thus, while a will could be contested through the common law courts, the transition of land through strict settlement could not. John Habbakuk tells us that the legal act of according inherited property to an eldest son, or in the absence of a son, to the next legal living male member of a family was the basis for strict settlement and prior to its inception, the intrinsic foundation of primogeniture
(2) . Eileen Spring discusses primogeniture with a focus on its effects on heiresses. She observes that "landowner" is a word that in the eighteenth century did not include a widow or daughter, as females were never to be part of the discussion of language of inheritance. At a husband's death, a wife, under the auspices of common law, however, became a powerful entity. She often had the power to take over a family business and control its money, stocks and bonds-personalty-lef t behind by the deceased. The lot of a widow underscores the difference in power between settlement laws and common law, the regulation of realty, or an estate, and the distribution of personalty (Law, 8-12) . Strict settlement's rigid succession of male heirs was guaranteed through a list of successors who would inherit should an eldest son not be alive or born at the time of a father's death. The list often included cousins, uncles, and nephews, or sometimes even included males from a wife's family, such as her brother or uncle. The guarantee of male succession of property was coupled with a provision for wives and children through settlement portions, leaving money and settlements, or jointures, for their future support, alleviating the legal and sibling squabbles so prevalent in previous
- Page 1 and 2: THE INHERITANCE NOVEL: THE POWER OF
- Page 3 and 4: Three points are fundamental in ide
- Page 5 and 6: intelligence. I must also thank Lin
- Page 7 and 8: Chapter Three ....................
- Page 9 and 10: "inheritance novels." Three factors
- Page 11 and 12: specifically to drive the plot. Fir
- Page 13 and 14: father wished, he could allows equa
- Page 15: usually on fiscal matters, but thes
- Page 19 and 20: would "resettle" the estate. In oth
- Page 21 and 22: placed on the estate. Those restric
- Page 23 and 24: Even the simple definitions of inhe
- Page 25 and 26: from the surface and often not very
- Page 27 and 28: mastery and confusion of inheritanc
- Page 29 and 30: of their futures, while the develop
- Page 31 and 32: culture, this is the first study to
- Page 33 and 34: This power which the mind has thus
- Page 35 and 36: successful marriage was expressed i
- Page 37 and 38: procedure and could not foresee the
- Page 39 and 40: the end, is partly responsible for
- Page 41 and 42: For all the recent criticism dealin
- Page 43 and 44: welfare. Although several of her br
- Page 45 and 46: language and a feminine independenc
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter Two Unhappy Transactions: R
- Page 49 and 50: Clarissa. Richardson's masterpiece
- Page 51 and 52: Since Zomchickfs study, Eileen Spri
- Page 53 and 54: settlement, a predicament Clarissa
- Page 55 and 56: life and conjectured within the pag
- Page 57 and 58: included in the compilation of the
- Page 59 and 60: The eighteenth-century reading publ
- Page 61 and 62: Clarissa's own will, framing the pl
- Page 63 and 64: to [the Solmes marriage settlement]
- Page 65 and 66: Grandfather Harlowe was one of many
the ability to gain title or a seat in the House, landed<br />
families had to devise a stronger and narrower practice<br />
of inheritance that would not come under the jurisdiction<br />
of common law and that could stand on its own regulation.<br />
Strict settlement, or the practice of attaching a<br />
rigid, unchangeable succession of male heirs to an<br />
estate, was designed exclusively to keep large estates in<br />
the hands of male inheritors and free from the<br />
jurisdiction of common law. A strict settlement was not<br />
a will. Strict settlement was a practice separate from<br />
other inheritance practices. Thus, the eldest male and<br />
estate owner could not only rely on strict settlement to<br />
formulate the passing of the family estate, but he could<br />
also write personal wills in order to provide for<br />
specific family members, willing away specific<br />
personalty, or "ephemeral" property as he wished. Thus,<br />
while a will could be contested through the common law<br />
courts, the transition of land through strict settlement<br />
could not.<br />
John Habbakuk tells us that the legal act of<br />
according inherited property to an eldest son, or in the<br />
absence of a son, to the next legal living male member of<br />
a family was the basis for strict settlement and prior to<br />
its inception, the intrinsic foundation of primogeniture