Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice

Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice

library.umaine.edu
from library.umaine.edu More from this publisher
02.04.2013 Views

Most money was in the hands of merchants and professionals. New ports, new frontiers, new ventures, all provided English businessmen with immense opportunity to make money. Money was venture capital, investment, power, but it was not a bottom line on a bank account. It was not cash in the pocket. Pocket money, spending money was not yet en vogue, as shops and shopping were still in their infancy. Money made men rich; but, for purposes other than business, money held little reward. Money was, however, the first step to real power, for it could buy land. 2 One of the Civil War's outcomes was the formation of the Tory and Whig parties, which would change the structure of the House of Commons, endowing it with its recognizably modern features. Sitting for election to the House of Commons in the eighteenth century meant that a man must be a landowner or have a title. Eventually, having both was the best solution. The king often conferred titles in order to influence crucial votes, 2 Two legal authorities are vital to the foundation of this study. Eileen Spring has written widely and wisely about the effects of strict settlement in families from the 1500s to the 1800s, and John Habbakuk has done the same, though well before Spring. Of the literary critics who are now making inroads into the influence of economics and law on eighteenth-century literature, Sandra Sherman, April London, Nancy Armstrong and Susan Greenfield are important for highlighting economic influences and gender issues in the early novel.

usually on fiscal matters, but these titles were non- hereditary. Families would have to raise substantial sums and garner much property to be considered to keep the title once the original endowment passed away. Merchant families wanted land and titles. They wanted to live according to their means. Aristocracy, on the other hand, wanted money in order to keep their ancestral estates. While the situation seems ideal for both, both sides came to the realization that intermarriage and interclass socializing, exchange of property, and intermingling of noble and common lineage were inevitable, yet fraught with unimaginable class- incurred tensions, creating a stranglehold on legal marriage and inheritance contracts as they then existed. Primogeniture could no longer accommodate the needs of the upper classes for several reasons. First, through the authority of common law, a vast estate, having no male heir, could legally be put into the hands of a daughter, thus into the hands of her husband's family, eradicating not only the family estate, but also, and more importantly, the family name. Second, vast estates could be broken into smaller and smaller parcels through equal distribution to all heirs, male and female. In order to keep an estate and enlarge it, allowing a family

Most money was in the hands of merchants and<br />

professionals. New ports, new frontiers, new ventures,<br />

all provided English businessmen with immense opportunity<br />

to make money. Money was venture capital, investment,<br />

power, but it was not a bottom line on a bank account.<br />

It was not cash in the pocket. Pocket money, spending<br />

money was not yet en vogue, as shops and shopping were<br />

still in their infancy. Money made men rich; but, for<br />

purposes other than business, money held little reward.<br />

Money was, however, the first step to real power, for it<br />

could buy land. 2<br />

One of the Civil War's outcomes was the formation of<br />

the Tory and Whig parties, which would change the<br />

structure of the House of Commons, endowing it with its<br />

recognizably modern features. Sitting for election to<br />

the House of Commons in the eighteenth century meant that<br />

a man must be a landowner or have a title. Eventually,<br />

having both was the best solution. The king often<br />

conferred titles in order to influence crucial votes,<br />

2 Two legal authorities are vital to the foundation of this study.<br />

Eileen Spring has written widely and wisely about the effects of<br />

strict settlement in families from the 1500s to the 1800s, and John<br />

Habbakuk has done the same, though well before Spring. Of the<br />

literary critics who are now making inroads into the influence of<br />

economics and law on eighteenth-century literature, Sandra Sherman,<br />

April London, Nancy Armstrong and Susan Greenfield are important for<br />

highlighting economic influences and gender issues in the early<br />

novel.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!