Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice
Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice
Most money was in the hands of merchants and professionals. New ports, new frontiers, new ventures, all provided English businessmen with immense opportunity to make money. Money was venture capital, investment, power, but it was not a bottom line on a bank account. It was not cash in the pocket. Pocket money, spending money was not yet en vogue, as shops and shopping were still in their infancy. Money made men rich; but, for purposes other than business, money held little reward. Money was, however, the first step to real power, for it could buy land. 2 One of the Civil War's outcomes was the formation of the Tory and Whig parties, which would change the structure of the House of Commons, endowing it with its recognizably modern features. Sitting for election to the House of Commons in the eighteenth century meant that a man must be a landowner or have a title. Eventually, having both was the best solution. The king often conferred titles in order to influence crucial votes, 2 Two legal authorities are vital to the foundation of this study. Eileen Spring has written widely and wisely about the effects of strict settlement in families from the 1500s to the 1800s, and John Habbakuk has done the same, though well before Spring. Of the literary critics who are now making inroads into the influence of economics and law on eighteenth-century literature, Sandra Sherman, April London, Nancy Armstrong and Susan Greenfield are important for highlighting economic influences and gender issues in the early novel.
usually on fiscal matters, but these titles were non- hereditary. Families would have to raise substantial sums and garner much property to be considered to keep the title once the original endowment passed away. Merchant families wanted land and titles. They wanted to live according to their means. Aristocracy, on the other hand, wanted money in order to keep their ancestral estates. While the situation seems ideal for both, both sides came to the realization that intermarriage and interclass socializing, exchange of property, and intermingling of noble and common lineage were inevitable, yet fraught with unimaginable class- incurred tensions, creating a stranglehold on legal marriage and inheritance contracts as they then existed. Primogeniture could no longer accommodate the needs of the upper classes for several reasons. First, through the authority of common law, a vast estate, having no male heir, could legally be put into the hands of a daughter, thus into the hands of her husband's family, eradicating not only the family estate, but also, and more importantly, the family name. Second, vast estates could be broken into smaller and smaller parcels through equal distribution to all heirs, male and female. In order to keep an estate and enlarge it, allowing a family
- Page 1 and 2: THE INHERITANCE NOVEL: THE POWER OF
- Page 3 and 4: Three points are fundamental in ide
- Page 5 and 6: intelligence. I must also thank Lin
- Page 7 and 8: Chapter Three ....................
- Page 9 and 10: "inheritance novels." Three factors
- Page 11 and 12: specifically to drive the plot. Fir
- Page 13: father wished, he could allows equa
- Page 17 and 18: (2) . Eileen Spring discusses primo
- Page 19 and 20: would "resettle" the estate. In oth
- Page 21 and 22: placed on the estate. Those restric
- Page 23 and 24: Even the simple definitions of inhe
- Page 25 and 26: from the surface and often not very
- Page 27 and 28: mastery and confusion of inheritanc
- Page 29 and 30: of their futures, while the develop
- Page 31 and 32: culture, this is the first study to
- Page 33 and 34: This power which the mind has thus
- Page 35 and 36: successful marriage was expressed i
- Page 37 and 38: procedure and could not foresee the
- Page 39 and 40: the end, is partly responsible for
- Page 41 and 42: For all the recent criticism dealin
- Page 43 and 44: welfare. Although several of her br
- Page 45 and 46: language and a feminine independenc
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter Two Unhappy Transactions: R
- Page 49 and 50: Clarissa. Richardson's masterpiece
- Page 51 and 52: Since Zomchickfs study, Eileen Spri
- Page 53 and 54: settlement, a predicament Clarissa
- Page 55 and 56: life and conjectured within the pag
- Page 57 and 58: included in the compilation of the
- Page 59 and 60: The eighteenth-century reading publ
- Page 61 and 62: Clarissa's own will, framing the pl
- Page 63 and 64: to [the Solmes marriage settlement]
Most money was in the hands of merchants and<br />
professionals. New ports, new frontiers, new ventures,<br />
all provided English businessmen with immense opportunity<br />
to make money. Money was venture capital, investment,<br />
power, but it was not a bottom line on a bank account.<br />
It was not cash in the pocket. Pocket money, spending<br />
money was not yet en vogue, as shops and shopping were<br />
still in their infancy. Money made men rich; but, for<br />
purposes other than business, money held little reward.<br />
Money was, however, the first step to real power, for it<br />
could buy land. 2<br />
One of the Civil War's outcomes was the formation of<br />
the Tory and Whig parties, which would change the<br />
structure of the House of Commons, endowing it with its<br />
recognizably modern features. Sitting for election to<br />
the House of Commons in the eighteenth century meant that<br />
a man must be a landowner or have a title. Eventually,<br />
having both was the best solution. The king often<br />
conferred titles in order to influence crucial votes,<br />
2 Two legal authorities are vital to the foundation of this study.<br />
Eileen Spring has written widely and wisely about the effects of<br />
strict settlement in families from the 1500s to the 1800s, and John<br />
Habbakuk has done the same, though well before Spring. Of the<br />
literary critics who are now making inroads into the influence of<br />
economics and law on eighteenth-century literature, Sandra Sherman,<br />
April London, Nancy Armstrong and Susan Greenfield are important for<br />
highlighting economic influences and gender issues in the early<br />
novel.