Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice

Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice Language In Clarissa, Evelina And Pride And Prejudice

library.umaine.edu
from library.umaine.edu More from this publisher
02.04.2013 Views

tension, and she reflects it in her novels. More specifically, she calls attention to it in her preface to Evelina when she reflects on her personal and public \\namelessness," her reluctance to share her private work with the public. Unlike Richardson, who worked hard to make all his writing didactic, a goal shared by Johnson, Frances Burneyf s wish for her first published novel is more difficult to define. Caroline Evelyn's fiery demise could not keep her creator from narrating the education of Caroline's daughter in the eighteenth-century marriage market. Campbell cites the similarity between Burney's father, her literary fathers, and Mr. Villars, all of whom subscribe to "the code of feminine propriety," which clashes with Burney's stated need to present her patriarchal mentors, as well as society, with a "competitive project" (322) . Thus, Burney' s project is filled with overtones of dominant male language, and her own ambivalent views affect her ability to perform as the guardian of her creation, Evelina, making Burney's didactic wish for her novel much more subtle than Richardson's.

Kristina Straub, Julia Epstein and Patricia Meyer Spacks all claim Evelina as a novel of dichotomies, pitting city against country, public against private, and most importantly, author against character. While all three appreciate Evelina's status as a young woman of quality grievously deprived of her rightful position as heir to Sir John Belmont, none addresses directly the important roles inheritance and strict settlement play in constructing the primary plot of the novel and its character, or how inheritance practice forces her into an mis-identified position. What is more, not only she, but all the other characters as well, are in such mis- identified positions throughout the novel, and critics have not touched on how their mis-identifications play on Evelina's ability to become herself, with her own identity, and with her true inheritance. None of the three, Straub, Epstein or Spacks, explores the importance the language of inheritance plays in the actions of characters and plot direction. This study is the first to look specifically at inheritance language and the power it wields in Burneyrs novel.

tension, and she reflects it in her novels. More<br />

specifically, she calls attention to it in her preface to<br />

<strong>Evelina</strong> when she reflects on her personal and public<br />

\\namelessness," her reluctance to share her private work<br />

with the public.<br />

Unlike Richardson, who worked hard to make all his<br />

writing didactic, a goal shared by Johnson, Frances<br />

Burneyf s wish for her first published novel is more<br />

difficult to define. Caroline Evelyn's fiery demise could<br />

not keep her creator from narrating the education of<br />

Caroline's daughter in the eighteenth-century marriage<br />

market.<br />

Campbell cites the similarity between Burney's<br />

father, her literary fathers, and Mr. Villars, all of<br />

whom subscribe to "the code of feminine propriety," which<br />

clashes with Burney's stated need to present her<br />

patriarchal mentors, as well as society, with a<br />

"competitive project" (322) . Thus, Burney' s project is<br />

filled with overtones of dominant male language, and her<br />

own ambivalent views affect her ability to perform as the<br />

guardian of her creation, <strong>Evelina</strong>, making Burney's<br />

didactic wish for her novel much more subtle than<br />

Richardson's.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!