02.04.2013 Views

Dakin Advanced Psychophysics.pdf

Dakin Advanced Psychophysics.pdf

Dakin Advanced Psychophysics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Advanced</strong> psychophysics<br />

Steven <strong>Dakin</strong><br />

UCL Institute of Ophthalmology<br />

s.dakin@ucl.ac.uk<br />

Tasks, sampling methods and measures<br />

• Tasks (what does the subject do?)<br />

• Magnitude estimation (“how bright is it?”)<br />

• Detection (“is it there?”); yes/no requires criterion<br />

• Discrimination (“which is brighter”); forced choice is criterion-free<br />

Weber-Fechner<br />

Law<br />

Steven’s<br />

Power Law<br />

Introduction<br />

• To understand the brain, one must understand not only<br />

its components (e.g. physiology) and their purpose (e.g. via models)<br />

but also behaviour (e.g. psychophysics)<br />

• <strong>Psychophysics</strong> characterises the relationship between<br />

physical (e.g. visual) stimuli & behaviour (e.g. of humans). Reveals<br />

mechanism (e.g. trichromacy), links to other disciplines (e.g. via<br />

stats), clinical applications (e.g. diagnosis), etc.<br />

• Psychophysical experiments involve<br />

• A stimulus/phenomenon (e.g. illusions) Hard<br />

• A task (e.g. matching)<br />

• A method (e.g. adjustment)<br />

• A performance-measure (e.g. threshold,PSE)<br />

<strong>Psychophysics</strong>/<br />

methodology<br />

Tasks, sampling methods and measures<br />

• Sampling methods (how to select stimulus magnitude?)<br />

• Adjustment (under observer-control)<br />

• Method of constant stimuli (predefined set of stimulus magnitudes)<br />

• Staircase (select stimulus based on previous responses)


Tasks, sampling methods and measures<br />

• Measures: (how to characterise behaviour?)<br />

• Reaction times (how long to judge?). Atheoretical, but popular (e.g. IAT)<br />

• Percent correct (what level of performance at a fixed stimulus magnitude?): e.g.<br />

observers memorise 10 objects & are presented with a new set containing 5 they saw and 5<br />

they hadn’t. Observer #1 recognises them all, observer #2 none; both score 50% correct...<br />

• Point of subjective equality (stimulus mag. producing a perceptual match?)<br />

• Thresholds (minimum stimulus mag. producing some level of performance?).<br />

Absolute and relative...<br />

• Principled (signal detection theory). • Reliable/replicable<br />

• Efficient • Versatile<br />

• Stimulus<br />

(letter)<br />

Example I: Acuity<br />

• Method (method of constant stimuli)<br />

Letter size<br />

Correct<br />

Incorrect<br />

• Task(reading, 10AFC forced choice)<br />

Trial<br />

5 10 15 20<br />

Trial #<br />

Run<br />

“B” ✔ “N” ✔ “O” ✖ ...<br />

Appearance<br />

Performance<br />

• Performance measure<br />

(acuity threshold)<br />

1.0<br />

0.55<br />

0.1<br />

Psychometric<br />

function<br />

Acuity/size<br />

threshold<br />

• Stimulus<br />

(letter)<br />

Example I: Acuity<br />

• Task (letter<br />

identification)<br />

• Method (adjustment)<br />

Letter size<br />

[<br />

[<br />

Acuity threshold:<br />

Size leading to<br />

79.2% correct<br />

identification<br />

1 2 3<br />

Trial #<br />

• Performance<br />

measure<br />

(average setting = size<br />

threshold)<br />

Example I: Acuity<br />

• Method (adaptive staircase)<br />

Letter size<br />

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45<br />

Trial #<br />

Correct<br />

Incorrect<br />

• Performance<br />

measure (threshold)


Example II: Contrast detection<br />

• Stimulus (disc)<br />

{ ΔL C=ΔL/Lback • Task (detection)<br />

“Yes” ✔ “No” ✔ “No” ✖<br />

...<br />

• Method (method of constant stimuli)<br />

×16 trials ×16 trials ×16 trials ...<br />

L<br />

Lback<br />

• Performance measure<br />

(absolute threshold)<br />

Prop. correct<br />

1.0<br />

0.75<br />

0.5<br />

Psychometric<br />

function<br />

Detection<br />

threshold<br />

0.0 0.1 0.2<br />

• Neurons give you a “noisy” code. If you used neural activity to<br />

make your judgement you can predict psychometric functions...<br />

• Consider orientation discrimination...<br />

σ<br />

Prob<br />

“CW”<br />

Thresholds<br />

Prob<br />

“CW”<br />

Prob<br />

“CW”<br />

• Means that thresholds measure σ your uncertainty<br />

about a stimulus or the width of your neural detector<br />

• Cumulative Gaussian psychometric function is integral<br />

of a Gaussian (hence use of 83% correct)<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

-3.0<br />

Psychometric<br />

function<br />

Contrast<br />

0.0 3.0<br />

Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination<br />

Proportion correct<br />

0.75<br />

Stimulus contrast<br />

0.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.5 1.0<br />

0.0<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

1.0<br />

Better<br />

Worse<br />

0.83<br />

Slope∝<br />

1/threshold<br />

0.5<br />

threshold<br />

Proportion “2 “higher” is higher”<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

Stimulus contrast<br />

PSE<br />

slope=<br />

threshold<br />

threshold<br />

• Two key psychophysical measures<br />

• Point of Subjective Equality (PSE) or bias measures appearance (accuracy)<br />

• Threshold (here, increment threshold) measures limits* of performance (precision)<br />

(*generally interested in best possible performance)<br />

(Accuracy versus precision: an accurate but imprecise clock, on average yields the right time, but individual readings vary wildly.<br />

An inaccurate but precise clock is e.g. reliably an hour slow)<br />

#1<br />

#2<br />

Shift=bias or<br />

appearance<br />

“Forced-choice” vs “Non-forced choice”<br />

• Experiment in which two or more alternatives are<br />

present (e.g. “which side is patch on?”, “which is bigger?”)<br />

• Some difference in convention as to whether both<br />

alternatives must be present e.g. tilt. i.e. is it<br />

the stimulus or the response?<br />

• If it’s response; detection is forced choice<br />

(actually 2AFC)<br />

“Criterion-free” vs “Criterion-dependent”<br />

• Yes/no means observer judges how strong stimulus must<br />

be to respond (“trigger happy”), forced choice does not<br />

• Different criteria bias subjects in detection. (Bias still arises in<br />

discrimination but no “trade-off”...)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!