130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System
130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System 130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System
2. Division of Zechariah 77 10.1-11.3, 1 and note the difference that would result by excluding 11.1-3. Zech. 11.1-3 must also be considered separately. 11.4-14 + 15-17 Despite the acute problems of interpretation, there is no dispute about the fact that vv. 4-17 belong together, and that the section falls into two unequal parts: vv. 4-14, 15-17. The word TU> in v. 15 makes the connection explicit (see also below on 13.7-9). 72.7-73.6 The word KtoD which begins both 9.1 and 12.1, coupled with m.T -Qi and mrr DR3, make this the clearest possible beginning of a new section. Most modern commentators see it as extending to the end of 13.1. Yet 13.1 does introduce the theme of cleansing, not explicitly stated in 12.1-14, and this is continued in a different way in 13.2-6. The twin DTH rrm of 13.2 reads strangely after 13.1 Kinn DVH, and it may be that v. 1 was added after vv. 2-6 had been placed in their present position. On the other hand the same phrases occur frequently throughout the section: »inn ova rrm (12.3, 9; 13.2, 4). ninn nva (12.4, 6, 8, 11; 13.1). Several commentators subdivide the passage somewhere in the middle: after v. 7, 8, or 9. 2 It seems that the most likely place is between vv. 9 and 10, where a new theme, compassion and mourning, begins. The best solution for us is to consider the following units: 12.1-14; 12.1-13.1; 12.1-13.6. This means that the main analysis will be carried out on the last (inclusive) unit. 73.7-9 This section, in its present place, is a clearly defined unit: poetry bounded by prose, with a consistent theme, different from both 13.1-6 and 14.Iff.; it begins with an imperative and reaches a fitting climax in v. 9. The only question is whether it originally belonged in a different place, viz. after 11.4-17. 3 There is no harm in investigating 1. This does not mean giving support to Lamarche's division 10.3b-11.3, which will be considered below. 2. Verse 7: Otzen, G.A. Smith; v. 8: Mitchell, R.L. Smith; v. 9: Baldwin, Mason, Perowne; Willi-Plein treats vv. 4-11 and 12-14 together, regarding torn ova as a leitmotif (pp. 57-58). 3. Mason, Mitchell, Rudolph, G.A. Smith. The view of Keil that 13.7-14.21 forms a complete section which is an expansion of 12.1-13.6 is interesting and may
78 Structure and the Book ofZechariah 11.4-17 + 13.7-9 as a unit. A negative result would not be surprising, but if these combined units were to exhibit a clear unified structure it would strengthen the case of those who advocate rearrangement. 1 We should also investigate the whole of 11.4-13.9. Assuming that 13.7-9 was given its present place for intelligent reasons, its relation to the preceding sections must be of interest. 14.1-21 It is as obvious that this section must be treated a whole as it is that it shows signs of being added to. This is true even if vv. 16-21 are an independent unit. The theme of the whole is the universal reign of Yahweh, which involves the defeat of Jerusalem by her enemies (v. 2), the defeat of the enemies (vv. 3, 12-15), and finally their worshipping Yahweh in Jerusalem (v. 16). With this are combined several eschatological and even apocalyptic motifs. So numerous are the introductory formulae that almost any verse from v. 4 (or even v. 2) onwards could be deleted as a later addition! The most obvious break occurs after v. 15, as nearly all commentators acknowledge. Those who subdivide further usually do so after v. 5 and/or v. II. 2 It remains for these results to be summarized: be considered later. It has not found modern supporters as far as I am aware. 1. We might still have to entertain a counter-claim that the unit was deliberately split by the author or editor. 2. Verse 5 and v. 11: R.L. Smith; Gaide has an unusual arrangement: vv. 1-6, La dernitre nuit; 7-15, Lejour sans declin; those who make no division except after v. 15 include Baldwin, Lacocque, Lamarche. Willi-Plein again has a novel suggestion: vv. 1-9, 10-19,20-21.
- Page 28 and 29: 1. Investigating Structure 27 The a
- Page 30 and 31: 1. Investigating Structure 29 In de
- Page 32 and 33: 1. Investigating Structure 31 for e
- Page 34 and 35: 1. Investigating Structure 33 2. Th
- Page 36 and 37: 1. Investigating Structure 35 Schol
- Page 38 and 39: 1. Investigating Structure 37 shoul
- Page 40 and 41: 1. Investigating Structure 39 The f
- Page 42 and 43: 1. Investigating Structure 41 Jerem
- Page 44 and 45: 1. Investigating Structure 43 1. 2.
- Page 46 and 47: 1. Investigating Structure 45 The s
- Page 48 and 49: 1. Investigating Structure 47 scept
- Page 50 and 51: 1. Investigating Structure 49 the c
- Page 52 and 53: 1. Investigating Structure 51 Coven
- Page 54 and 55: 1. Investigating Structure 53 Theor
- Page 56 and 57: 1. Investigating Structure 55 a *7i
- Page 58 and 59: 1. Investigating Structure 57 surer
- Page 60 and 61: 1. Investigating Structure 59 3. We
- Page 62 and 63: 1. Investigating Structure 61 e. At
- Page 64 and 65: 2. Division of Zechariah 63 usually
- Page 66 and 67: 2. Division of Zechariah 65 2.1-4:
- Page 68 and 69: 2. Division of Zechariah 67 2.77: I
- Page 70 and 71: 2. Division of Zechariah 69 5.1-4:
- Page 72 and 73: 2. Division of Zechariah 71 peoples
- Page 74 and 75: 2. Division of Zechariah 73 prepare
- Page 76 and 77: 2. Division of Zechariah 75 10.Iff.
- Page 80 and 81: Main investigation (computer result
- Page 82 and 83: Verses 1 Word 1 ehn 1 2 ntf 3 3 DTT
- Page 84 and 85: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 86 and 87: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 88 and 89: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 90 and 91: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 92 and 93: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 94 and 95: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 96 and 97: Verses Word 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11
- Page 98 and 99: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 100 and 101: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 102 and 103: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 104 and 105: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 106 and 107: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 108 and 109: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 110 and 111: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 112 and 113: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 114 and 115: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 116 and 117: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 118 and 119: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 120 and 121: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 122 and 123: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 124 and 125: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 126 and 127: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
78 Structure and the Book ofZechariah<br />
11.4-17 + 13.7-9 as a unit. A negative result would not be surprising,<br />
but if these combined units were to exhibit a clear unified structure it<br />
would strengthen the case of those who advocate rearrangement. 1 We<br />
should also investigate the whole of 11.4-13.9. Assuming that 13.7-9<br />
was given its present place for intelligent reasons, its relation to the<br />
preceding sections must be of interest.<br />
14.1-21<br />
It is as obvious that this section must be treated a whole as it is that it<br />
shows signs of being added to. This is true even if vv. 16-21 are an<br />
independent unit. <strong>The</strong> theme of the whole is the universal reign of<br />
Yahweh, which involves the defeat of Jerusalem by her enemies<br />
(v. 2), the defeat of the enemies (vv. 3, 12-15), and finally their<br />
worshipping Yahweh in Jerusalem (v. 16). With this are combined<br />
several eschatological and even apocalyptic motifs. So numerous are<br />
the introductory formulae that almost any verse from v. 4 (or even<br />
v. 2) onwards could be deleted as a later addition!<br />
<strong>The</strong> most obvious break occurs after v. 15, as nearly all commentators<br />
acknowledge. Those who subdivide further usually do so after<br />
v. 5 and/or v. II. 2<br />
It remains for these results to be summarized:<br />
be considered later. It has not found modern supporters as far as I am aware.<br />
1. We might still have to entertain a counter-claim that the unit was deliberately<br />
split by the author or editor.<br />
2. Verse 5 and v. 11: R.L. Smith; Gaide has an unusual arrangement: vv. 1-6,<br />
La dernitre nuit; 7-15, Lejour sans declin; those who make no division except after<br />
v. 15 include Baldwin, Lacocque, Lamarche. Willi-Plein again has a novel suggestion:<br />
vv. 1-9, 10-19,20-21.
Change language