130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System
130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System 130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System
2. Division of Zechariah 71 peoples and strong nations' (v. 22) will do (vv. 21-22). The chiastic structure is therefore immediately obvious, 1 although the distance between the extremities might suggest later additions to the original chiasmus. This means it might be profitable to suppose an earlier literary unit: 7.1-3 + 8.18-21 (22?, 23?) and to determine the literary nature of subsequent treatment. Most commentators divide ch. 7 into vv. 1-3, narrative, followed by oracular material: vv. 4-14, 2 or vv. 4-6 + 7-14, 3 or vv. 4- 7 + 8-14. 4 Verses 4-7 are introduced by 'And the word of Yahweh came to me' as in 8.1, 18, whereas 7.8 reads '. ..to Zechariah'. It is possible, therefore, that v. 8 is redactional and that v. 9 originally followed v. 7. If this is so then the division vv. 4-6 + 7-14 is logical. However, we are also interested in the structure of the text after v. 8 was inserted. In other words we want to know whether the redactor helped to create or to destroy a planned structure. It is even possible that he did both. We must therefore consider vv. 4-14 with and without v. 8. 1. Nevertheless I can only find one example of a commentator past or present who has apparently noted this. C. Stuhlmueller, in his brief Rebuilding with Hope: A Commentary on the Books of Haggai and Zechariah (International Theological Commentary; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988), says: 'The editor formed a carefully crafted unit of chs. 7-8 and then stitched this finale harmoniously into place. The question about fasting (7.3-5; 8.18f.) and the role of foreigners (7.If.; 8.22f.) constitute an envelope around the other material in the final two chapters.' Even the Meyers', who show considerable concern at times for structure, and compare these chapters with Hag. 1-2, content themselves with pointing out the similarities between 8.18-23 and 7.1-6 and the implication that thereby chs. 7-8 are given their own literary integrity, Haggai, Zechariah, pp. 442-43. Petersen makes no attempt to introduce chs. 7-8 as a whole, despite the fact that he also notes 8.18-23 as an answer to 7.3. R.L. Smith says that 'the arrangement of the materials in chaps. 7 and 8 is rough' and that they can best be divided into three broad sections: 7.1-6, the question about fasting; 7.7-14, reiteration of the words of the former prophets; 8.1-23, a Decalogue of promises, Nahum-Malachi (WBC; Waco, TX: Word Books, 1984), p. 220. A little later he comments that there are superscriptions at vv. 18, 19, 20 and 23 which indicate 'separate collections that have been put together' (pp. 238-39). Even Beuken, who devotes much space to chs. 7-8 (pp. 15-19, 118-83), does not offer a full explanation of their structure. 2. E.g. Petitjean. 3. E.g. Amsler, Beuken, Meyers, R.L. Smith. 4. E.g. Petersen.
72 Structure and the Book ofZechariah Chapter 8 readily divides into ten short oracles by means of the phrase "Thus says Yahweh': vv. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7-8, 9-13, 14-17, 19, 20-22, 23. Longer introductory formulae are found in vv. 1 and 18. It is very doubtful whether these were originally independent, and even if they were, they are too short for our purposes. There is broad agreement as to how these are to be grouped together: vv. 1-8 + 9- 17 1 (or simply 1-17); 2 and vv. 18-23. The main sections to be investigated in chs. 7-8 are: 7-8; 7.1- 3 + 8.18-23; and 7.4-14 + 8.1-17. Having considered the individual sections of chs. 1-8, we must obviously consider these chapters as a whole. In addition chs. 1-6 form a clear major unit, and we must examine these chapters together, bearing in mind the possibility that 6.9-15 might need to be detached. Zechariah 9-14 The divisions are much less clear in the second part of the book of Zechariah, and much more difficult to describe from a form-critical point of view without prejudging certain issues. We may say at the outset that at least three large sections need to be investigated: chs. 9-11, 12-14 and 9-14. These are marked off by the heading Rfon, and recognized as major divisions by all scholars. 3 In dealing with smaller divisions of the text we shall opt to deal with too large rather than too small a section. 9.1-8 This section is a clear unit despite the severe problems which beset its detailed interpretation. This is not to deny that it may have an important connection with the following verses (see below). Verses 1- 7 all contain references to a foreign city or people, but v. 7 suddenly introduces an unexpected message of salvation for the Philistines. We should consider the possibility that this is redactional. Some 4 would treat vv. 9-10 with the first section, and v. 8 does 1. E.g. Beuken, Petitjean, R.L. Smith. 2. E.g. Amsler, Meyers, Petersen, Rudolph. 3. This does not rule out structures that may cut across this major division, as the situation with 11.15-17 and 13.7-9 shows. 4. E.g. E.G. Kraeling, The Historical Situation in Zech. 9.1-10', AJSL 41 (1924-25), pp. 24-33; quoted by P.O. Hanson, in The Dawn of Apocalyptic
- Page 22 and 23: 1. Investigating Structure 21 in th
- Page 24 and 25: Psalm 3 [Gibbs [Auffret Psalm 4 [Gi
- Page 26 and 27: 1. Investigating Structure 25 repet
- Page 28 and 29: 1. Investigating Structure 27 The a
- Page 30 and 31: 1. Investigating Structure 29 In de
- Page 32 and 33: 1. Investigating Structure 31 for e
- Page 34 and 35: 1. Investigating Structure 33 2. Th
- Page 36 and 37: 1. Investigating Structure 35 Schol
- Page 38 and 39: 1. Investigating Structure 37 shoul
- Page 40 and 41: 1. Investigating Structure 39 The f
- Page 42 and 43: 1. Investigating Structure 41 Jerem
- Page 44 and 45: 1. Investigating Structure 43 1. 2.
- Page 46 and 47: 1. Investigating Structure 45 The s
- Page 48 and 49: 1. Investigating Structure 47 scept
- Page 50 and 51: 1. Investigating Structure 49 the c
- Page 52 and 53: 1. Investigating Structure 51 Coven
- Page 54 and 55: 1. Investigating Structure 53 Theor
- Page 56 and 57: 1. Investigating Structure 55 a *7i
- Page 58 and 59: 1. Investigating Structure 57 surer
- Page 60 and 61: 1. Investigating Structure 59 3. We
- Page 62 and 63: 1. Investigating Structure 61 e. At
- Page 64 and 65: 2. Division of Zechariah 63 usually
- Page 66 and 67: 2. Division of Zechariah 65 2.1-4:
- Page 68 and 69: 2. Division of Zechariah 67 2.77: I
- Page 70 and 71: 2. Division of Zechariah 69 5.1-4:
- Page 74 and 75: 2. Division of Zechariah 73 prepare
- Page 76 and 77: 2. Division of Zechariah 75 10.Iff.
- Page 78 and 79: 2. Division of Zechariah 77 10.1-11
- Page 80 and 81: Main investigation (computer result
- Page 82 and 83: Verses 1 Word 1 ehn 1 2 ntf 3 3 DTT
- Page 84 and 85: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 86 and 87: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 88 and 89: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 90 and 91: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 92 and 93: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 94 and 95: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 96 and 97: Verses Word 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11
- Page 98 and 99: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 100 and 101: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 102 and 103: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 104 and 105: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 106 and 107: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 108 and 109: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 110 and 111: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 112 and 113: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 114 and 115: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 116 and 117: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 118 and 119: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 120 and 121: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
2. Division of Zechariah 71<br />
peoples and strong nations' (v. 22) will do (vv. 21-22). <strong>The</strong> chiastic<br />
structure is therefore immediately obvious, 1 although the distance<br />
between the extremities might suggest later additions to the original<br />
chiasmus. This means it might be profitable to suppose an earlier<br />
literary unit: 7.1-3 + 8.18-21 (22?, 23?) and to determine the literary<br />
nature of subsequent treatment.<br />
Most commentators divide ch. 7 into vv. 1-3, narrative, followed<br />
by oracular material: vv. 4-14, 2 or vv. 4-6 + 7-14, 3 or vv. 4-<br />
7 + 8-14. 4 Verses 4-7 are introduced by 'And the word of Yahweh<br />
came to me' as in 8.1, 18, whereas 7.8 reads '. ..to Zechariah'. It is<br />
possible, therefore, that v. 8 is redactional and that v. 9 originally<br />
followed v. 7. If this is so then the division vv. 4-6 + 7-14 is logical.<br />
However, we are also interested in the structure of the text after v. 8<br />
was inserted. In other words we want to know whether the redactor<br />
helped to create or to destroy a planned structure. It is even possible<br />
that he did both. We must therefore consider vv. 4-14 with and<br />
without v. 8.<br />
1. Nevertheless I can only find one example of a commentator past or present<br />
who has apparently noted this. C. Stuhlmueller, in his brief Rebuilding with Hope: A<br />
Commentary on the Books of Haggai and Zechariah (International <strong>The</strong>ological<br />
Commentary; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988), says: '<strong>The</strong> editor formed a carefully<br />
crafted unit of chs. 7-8 and then stitched this finale harmoniously into place. <strong>The</strong><br />
question about fasting (7.3-5; 8.18f.) and the role of foreigners (7.If.; 8.22f.)<br />
constitute an envelope around the other material in the final two chapters.' Even the<br />
Meyers', who show considerable concern at times for structure, and compare these<br />
chapters with Hag. 1-2, content themselves with pointing out the similarities<br />
between 8.18-23 and 7.1-6 and the implication that thereby chs. 7-8 are given their<br />
own literary integrity, Haggai, Zechariah, pp. 442-43. Petersen makes no attempt to<br />
introduce chs. 7-8 as a whole, despite the fact that he also notes 8.18-23 as an<br />
answer to 7.3. R.L. Smith says that 'the arrangement of the materials in chaps. 7 and<br />
8 is rough' and that they can best be divided into three broad sections: 7.1-6, the<br />
question about fasting; 7.7-14, reiteration of the words of the former prophets;<br />
8.1-23, a Decalogue of promises, Nahum-Malachi (WBC; Waco, TX: Word Books,<br />
1984), p. 220. A little later he comments that there are superscriptions at vv. 18,<br />
19, 20 and 23 which indicate 'separate collections that have been put together'<br />
(pp. 238-39). Even Beuken, who devotes much space to chs. 7-8 (pp. 15-19,<br />
118-83), does not offer a full explanation of their structure.<br />
2. E.g. Petitjean.<br />
3. E.g. Amsler, Beuken, Meyers, R.L. Smith.<br />
4. E.g. Petersen.